End-of-Life Treatment Preferences Among Older Adults: An Assessment of Psychosocial Influences

被引:30
作者
Carr, Deborah [1 ,2 ]
Moorman, Sara M. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Sociol, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Inst Hlth Hlth Care Policy & Aging Res, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
[3] Boston Coll, Dept Sociol, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 USA
[4] Boston Coll, Inst Aging, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 USA
关键词
advance care planning; aging; cognitive impairment; end-of-life issues; health; psychosocial influences; ADVANCE DIRECTIVES; SUSTAINING TREATMENT; DECISION-MAKING; CARE; DEATH; COMMUNICATION; INFORMATION; STABILITY; VALUES; ELDERS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1573-7861.2009.01135.x
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
We explore the content and correlates of older adults' end-of-life treatment preferences in two hypothetical terminal illness scenarios: severe physical pain with no cognitive impairment, and severe cognitive impairment with no physical pain. For each scenario, we assess whether participants would reject life-prolonging treatment, accept treatment, or do not know their preferences. Using data from the 2004 wave of the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (N = 5,106), we estimate multinomial logistic regression models to evaluate whether treatment preferences are associated with direct experience with end-of-life issues, personal beliefs, health, and sociodemographic characteristics. Persons who have made formal end-of-life preparations, persons with no religious affiliation, mainline Protestants, and persons who are pessimistic about their own life expectancy are more likely to reject treatment in both scenarios. Women and persons who witnessed the painful death of a loved one are more likely to reject treatment in the cognitive impairment scenario only. Consistent with rational choice perspectives, our results suggest that individuals prefer treatments that they perceive to have highly probable desirable consequences for both self and family.
引用
收藏
页码:754 / 778
页数:25
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Ajzen I., 1980, UNDERSTANDING ATTITU
[2]  
Allen JP, 1996, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V275, P474
[3]  
[Anonymous], INNOVATIONS END LIFE
[4]  
[Anonymous], OLD AM 2008 KEY IND
[5]   Racial and Ethnic Differences in Preferences for End-of-Life Treatment [J].
Barnato, Amber E. ;
Anthony, Denise L. ;
Skinner, Jonathan ;
Gallagher, Patricia M. ;
Fisher, Elliott S. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 24 (06) :695-701
[6]  
Bayer W, 2006, ETHNIC DIS, V16, P914
[7]   THEORY OF MARRIAGE .2. [J].
BECKER, GS .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1974, 82 (02) :S11-S26
[8]   Gender differences in older adults' preferences for life-sustaining medical treatments and end-of-life values [J].
Bookwala, J ;
Coppola, KM ;
Fagerlin, A ;
Ditto, PH ;
Danks, JH ;
Smucker, WD .
DEATH STUDIES, 2001, 25 (02) :127-149
[9]   Spousal caregiving and crossing gender boundaries: Maintaining gendered identities [J].
Calasanti, Toni ;
Bowen, Mary Elizabeth .
JOURNAL OF AGING STUDIES, 2006, 20 (03) :253-263
[10]   Health care proxies: Whom do young old adults choose and why? [J].
Carr, Deborah ;
Khodyakov, Dmitry .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, 2007, 48 (02) :180-194