Determining the cortical target of transcranial magnetic stimulation

被引:23
作者
Thielscher, A. [1 ]
Wichmann, F. A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Biol Cybernet, High Field Magnet Resonance Ctr, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Berlin, Sekr FR6 4, FG Modellierung Kognitiver Prozesse, D-1000 Berlin, Germany
[3] Bernstein Ctr Computat Neurosci Berlin, Berlin, Germany
关键词
MOTOR CORTEX; PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION; BRAIN-STIMULATION; COIL STIMULATION; ELECTRIC-FIELD; VISUAL-CORTEX; MODEL; ANISOTROPY; AREAS; SITE;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.021
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Determining the cortical region that is effectively targeted by TMS to induce a reproducible behavioral effect is a non-trivial problem. In mapping experiments, a grid of coil positions is used to systematically assess the TMS effect on, e.g. muscle responses or error rates. The center-of-mass (CoM) of the response distribution is projected onto the cortex to determine the likely target site, implicitly assuming the existence of a single, contiguous target. The mapping results, however, often contain several local maxima. These could either stem from measurement noise, or hint towards a distributed target region. Critically, the calculation of a CoM, by design, treats multiple maxima as if they were noise. Here, a stringent hierarchical sigmoidal model fitting approach is developed that determines the cortical target(s) from TMS mapping based on electric field calculations. Monte-Carlo simulations are used to assess the significance and the goodness-of-fit of the sigmoidal fits, and to obtain confidence regions around the calculated tat-gets. The approach was applied to mapping data on visual suppression (N=7). In all subjects, we reliably identified two or three neighboring targets commonly contributing to the suppression effect (average distance +/- SD: 7.7 +/- 2.3 mm). This demonstrates that (i) the assumption of a single CoM is not generally valid and (ii) the combination of TMS mapping with the fitting approach has a cortical resolution of <1 cm. The estimates for the field strength necessary to achieve 50% of the maximal suppression effect vary noticeably across subjects (mean +/- SD: 139 +/- 24 V/m), indicating inter-individual differences in the susceptibility to TMS. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1319 / 1330
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Cortical plasticity of motor-eloquent areas measured by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with glioma [J].
Conway, Neal ;
Wildschuetz, Noemie ;
Moser, Tobias ;
Bulubas, Lucia ;
Sollmann, Nico ;
Tanigawa, Noriko ;
Meyer, Bernhard ;
Krieg, Sandro M. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 127 (05) :981-991
[42]   Automated-parameterization of the motor evoked potential and cortical silent period induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Rabago, Christopher A. ;
Lancaster, Jack L. ;
Narayana, Shalini ;
Zhang, Wei ;
Fox, Peter T. .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 120 (08) :1577-1587
[43]   NeuroMeasure: A Software Package for Quantification of Cortical Motor Maps Using Frameless Stereotaxic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation [J].
Gerber, Michael B. ;
McLean, Alasdair C. ;
Stephen, Samuel J. ;
Chalco, Alex G. ;
Arshad, Usman M. ;
Thickbroom, Gary W. ;
Silverstein, Josh ;
Tsagaris, K. Zoe ;
Kuceyeski, Amy ;
Friel, Kathleen ;
Santos, Taiza E. G. ;
Edwards, Dylan J. .
FRONTIERS IN NEUROINFORMATICS, 2019, 13
[44]   Extent and Location of the Excitatory and Inhibitory Cortical Hand Representation Maps: A Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study [J].
Pitkanen, Minna ;
Kallioniemi, Elisa ;
Julkunen, Petro .
BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2015, 28 (05) :657-665
[45]   Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation? [J].
Priori, Aberto ;
Hallett, Mark ;
Rothwell, John C. .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2009, 2 (04) :241-245
[46]   Applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation in sleep medicine [J].
Civardi, Carlo ;
Collini, Alessandra ;
Monaco, Francesco ;
Cantello, Roberto .
SLEEP MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2009, 13 (01) :35-46
[47]   Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of substance addiction [J].
Gorelick, David A. ;
Zangen, Abraham ;
George, Mark S. .
ADDICTION REVIEWS, 2014, 1327 :79-93
[48]   Accuracy and precision of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Nieminen, Aino E. ;
Nieminen, Jaakko O. ;
Stenroos, Matti ;
Novikov, Pavel ;
Nazarova, Maria ;
Vaalto, Selja ;
Nikulin, Vadim ;
Ilmoniemi, Risto J. .
JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 19 (06)
[49]   A probabilistic transcranial magnetic stimulation localization method [J].
Kataja, Juhani ;
Soldati, Marco ;
Matilainen, Noora ;
Laakso, Ilkka .
JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 18 (04)
[50]   Optimal Coil Orientation for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation [J].
Richter, Lars ;
Neumann, Gunnar ;
Oung, Stephen ;
Schweikard, Achim ;
Trillenberg, Peter .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (04)