Determining the cortical target of transcranial magnetic stimulation

被引:23
作者
Thielscher, A. [1 ]
Wichmann, F. A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Biol Cybernet, High Field Magnet Resonance Ctr, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Berlin, Sekr FR6 4, FG Modellierung Kognitiver Prozesse, D-1000 Berlin, Germany
[3] Bernstein Ctr Computat Neurosci Berlin, Berlin, Germany
关键词
MOTOR CORTEX; PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION; BRAIN-STIMULATION; COIL STIMULATION; ELECTRIC-FIELD; VISUAL-CORTEX; MODEL; ANISOTROPY; AREAS; SITE;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.021
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Determining the cortical region that is effectively targeted by TMS to induce a reproducible behavioral effect is a non-trivial problem. In mapping experiments, a grid of coil positions is used to systematically assess the TMS effect on, e.g. muscle responses or error rates. The center-of-mass (CoM) of the response distribution is projected onto the cortex to determine the likely target site, implicitly assuming the existence of a single, contiguous target. The mapping results, however, often contain several local maxima. These could either stem from measurement noise, or hint towards a distributed target region. Critically, the calculation of a CoM, by design, treats multiple maxima as if they were noise. Here, a stringent hierarchical sigmoidal model fitting approach is developed that determines the cortical target(s) from TMS mapping based on electric field calculations. Monte-Carlo simulations are used to assess the significance and the goodness-of-fit of the sigmoidal fits, and to obtain confidence regions around the calculated tat-gets. The approach was applied to mapping data on visual suppression (N=7). In all subjects, we reliably identified two or three neighboring targets commonly contributing to the suppression effect (average distance +/- SD: 7.7 +/- 2.3 mm). This demonstrates that (i) the assumption of a single CoM is not generally valid and (ii) the combination of TMS mapping with the fitting approach has a cortical resolution of <1 cm. The estimates for the field strength necessary to achieve 50% of the maximal suppression effect vary noticeably across subjects (mean +/- SD: 139 +/- 24 V/m), indicating inter-individual differences in the susceptibility to TMS. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1319 / 1330
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Functional MRI of cortical activations induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
    Baudewig, J
    Siebner, HR
    Bestmann, S
    Tergau, F
    Tings, T
    Paulus, W
    Frahm, J
    [J]. NEUROREPORT, 2001, 12 (16) : 3543 - 3548
  • [22] Cortical excitability in tramadol dependent patients: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study
    Khedr, Eman M.
    Gabra, Romany H.
    Noaman, Mostafa
    Elfetoh, Noha Abo
    Farghaly, Hanan S. M.
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2016, 169 : 110 - 116
  • [23] Hand preference and transcranial magnetic stimulation asymmetry of cortical motor representation
    Triggs, WJ
    Subramanium, B
    Rossi, F
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 1999, 835 (02) : 324 - 329
  • [24] Spike suppression in a local cortical circuit induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Yoichi Miyawaki
    Takashi Shinozaki
    Masato Okada
    [J]. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 2012, 33 : 405 - 419
  • [25] Transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with early cortical dementia: A pilot study
    Issac, Thomas Gregor
    Chandra, S. R.
    Nagaraju, B. C.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INDIAN ACADEMY OF NEUROLOGY, 2013, 16 (04) : 619 - 622
  • [26] Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reveals Cortical Hyperexcitability in Episodic Cluster Headache
    Cosentino, Guiseppe
    Brighina, Filippo
    Brancato, Sara
    Valentino, Francesca
    Lndovino, Serena
    Fierro, Brigida
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2015, 16 (01) : 53 - 59
  • [27] Cortical activation during temporal preparation assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Tandonnet, C.
    Garry, M. I.
    Summers, J. J.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 85 (03) : 481 - 486
  • [28] Simulation of electromyographic recordings following transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Moezzi, Bahar
    Schaworonkow, Natalie
    Plogmacher, Lukas
    Goldsworthy, Mitchell R.
    Hordacre, Brenton
    McDonnell, Mark D.
    Iannella, Nicolangelo
    Ridding, Michael C.
    Triesch, Jochen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 120 (05) : 2532 - 2541
  • [29] Motor cortical plasticity in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - Electromyography studies
    Mehta, Urvakhsh Meherwan
    Thanki, Milind Vijay
    Padmanabhan, Jaya
    Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
    Keshavan, Matcheri S.
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2019, 207 : 37 - 47
  • [30] Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Horses
    Journee, Henricus Louis
    Journee, Sanne Lotte
    [J]. VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-EQUINE PRACTICE, 2022, 38 (02) : 189 - 211