Determining the cortical target of transcranial magnetic stimulation

被引:23
作者
Thielscher, A. [1 ]
Wichmann, F. A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Biol Cybernet, High Field Magnet Resonance Ctr, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Berlin, Sekr FR6 4, FG Modellierung Kognitiver Prozesse, D-1000 Berlin, Germany
[3] Bernstein Ctr Computat Neurosci Berlin, Berlin, Germany
关键词
MOTOR CORTEX; PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION; BRAIN-STIMULATION; COIL STIMULATION; ELECTRIC-FIELD; VISUAL-CORTEX; MODEL; ANISOTROPY; AREAS; SITE;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.021
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Determining the cortical region that is effectively targeted by TMS to induce a reproducible behavioral effect is a non-trivial problem. In mapping experiments, a grid of coil positions is used to systematically assess the TMS effect on, e.g. muscle responses or error rates. The center-of-mass (CoM) of the response distribution is projected onto the cortex to determine the likely target site, implicitly assuming the existence of a single, contiguous target. The mapping results, however, often contain several local maxima. These could either stem from measurement noise, or hint towards a distributed target region. Critically, the calculation of a CoM, by design, treats multiple maxima as if they were noise. Here, a stringent hierarchical sigmoidal model fitting approach is developed that determines the cortical target(s) from TMS mapping based on electric field calculations. Monte-Carlo simulations are used to assess the significance and the goodness-of-fit of the sigmoidal fits, and to obtain confidence regions around the calculated tat-gets. The approach was applied to mapping data on visual suppression (N=7). In all subjects, we reliably identified two or three neighboring targets commonly contributing to the suppression effect (average distance +/- SD: 7.7 +/- 2.3 mm). This demonstrates that (i) the assumption of a single CoM is not generally valid and (ii) the combination of TMS mapping with the fitting approach has a cortical resolution of <1 cm. The estimates for the field strength necessary to achieve 50% of the maximal suppression effect vary noticeably across subjects (mean +/- SD: 139 +/- 24 V/m), indicating inter-individual differences in the susceptibility to TMS. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1319 / 1330
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Functional MRI of cortical activations induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) [J].
Baudewig, J ;
Siebner, HR ;
Bestmann, S ;
Tergau, F ;
Tings, T ;
Paulus, W ;
Frahm, J .
NEUROREPORT, 2001, 12 (16) :3543-3548
[22]   Cortical excitability in tramadol dependent patients: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study [J].
Khedr, Eman M. ;
Gabra, Romany H. ;
Noaman, Mostafa ;
Elfetoh, Noha Abo ;
Farghaly, Hanan S. M. .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2016, 169 :110-116
[23]   Hand preference and transcranial magnetic stimulation asymmetry of cortical motor representation [J].
Triggs, WJ ;
Subramanium, B ;
Rossi, F .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1999, 835 (02) :324-329
[24]   Spike suppression in a local cortical circuit induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Yoichi Miyawaki ;
Takashi Shinozaki ;
Masato Okada .
Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 2012, 33 :405-419
[25]   Transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with early cortical dementia: A pilot study [J].
Issac, Thomas Gregor ;
Chandra, S. R. ;
Nagaraju, B. C. .
ANNALS OF INDIAN ACADEMY OF NEUROLOGY, 2013, 16 (04) :619-622
[26]   Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reveals Cortical Hyperexcitability in Episodic Cluster Headache [J].
Cosentino, Guiseppe ;
Brighina, Filippo ;
Brancato, Sara ;
Valentino, Francesca ;
Lndovino, Serena ;
Fierro, Brigida .
JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2015, 16 (01) :53-59
[27]   Cortical activation during temporal preparation assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Tandonnet, C. ;
Garry, M. I. ;
Summers, J. J. .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 85 (03) :481-486
[28]   Simulation of electromyographic recordings following transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Moezzi, Bahar ;
Schaworonkow, Natalie ;
Plogmacher, Lukas ;
Goldsworthy, Mitchell R. ;
Hordacre, Brenton ;
McDonnell, Mark D. ;
Iannella, Nicolangelo ;
Ridding, Michael C. ;
Triesch, Jochen .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 120 (05) :2532-2541
[29]   Motor cortical plasticity in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - Electromyography studies [J].
Mehta, Urvakhsh Meherwan ;
Thanki, Milind Vijay ;
Padmanabhan, Jaya ;
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro ;
Keshavan, Matcheri S. .
SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2019, 207 :37-47
[30]   Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Horses [J].
Journee, Henricus Louis ;
Journee, Sanne Lotte .
VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-EQUINE PRACTICE, 2022, 38 (02) :189-211