Music Perception and Speech-in-Noise Skills of Typical Hearing and Cochlear Implant Listeners

被引:22
作者
Fowler, Stephanie L. [1 ,2 ]
Calhoun, Hannah [2 ]
Warner-Czyz, Andrea D. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Dallas, Callier Ctr Commun Disorders, Richardson, TX 75080 USA
[2] Univ Texas Dallas, Dept Speech Language & Hearing, Richardson, TX 75080 USA
[3] Univ Texas Dallas, UT Pediat Cochlear Implant Program, Richardson, TX USA
关键词
ELECTRIC-ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; CLINICAL-ASSESSMENT; MELODY RECOGNITION; VARIABILITY; RECIPIENTS; ACCURACY; USERS;
D O I
10.1044/2020_AJA-20-00116
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: Adult cochlear implant (CI) users rate music as one of the most important auditory stimuli, second to speech perception. However, few studies simultaneously examine music perception and speech-in-noise perception in adult CI recipients. This study explores the effect of auditory status on music perception and speech-in-noise perception recognition in noise as well as the relationship among music engagement, music perception, and speech-in-noise perception. Method: Participants include 10 adults with typical hearing (TH) and 10 adults with long-term CI use. All participants completed the Music-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire, which assesses subjective music experiences and their importance; the Pitch Direction Discrimination, Familiar Melody Recognition, and Timbre Recognition subtests of the Clinical Assessment of Music Perception for Cochlear Implants; the Unfamiliar Melody Recognition subtest of the Profile of Music Perception Skills; and the Bamford-Kowal-Bench Speech-in-Noise Test. Results: The TH group significantly outperformed the CI group for speech-in-noise perception and on all four music perception tasks. The CI group exhibited not only significantly poorer mean scores but also greater variability in performance compared to the TH group. Only Familiar Melody Recognition and Unfamiliar Melody Recognition subtests significantly correlated with speech-in-noise scores. Conclusions: Patients and professionals should not assume speech perception and music perception in adult CI users derive from the same auditory or cognitive foundations. The lack of significant relationships among music engagement, music perception, and speech-in-noise perception scores in adult CI users suggests this population enjoys music despite poor and variable performance in discrete music tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 181
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Bench J, 1979, Br J Audiol, V13, P108, DOI 10.3109/03005367909078884
[2]  
Brockmeier SJ, 2010, ADV OTO-RHINO-LARYNG, V67, P70, DOI [10.1179/146701010X12671177440343, 10.1159/000262598]
[3]   Multidimensional measurement of exposure to music in childhood: Beyond the musician/non-musician dichotomy [J].
Cogo-Moreira, Hugo ;
Lamont, Alexandra .
PSYCHOLOGY OF MUSIC, 2018, 46 (04) :459-472
[4]   Clinical evaluation of music perception, appraisal and experience in cochlear implant users [J].
Drennan, Ward R. ;
Oleson, Jacob J. ;
Gfeller, Kate ;
Crosson, Jillian ;
Driscoll, Virginia D. ;
Won, Jong Ho ;
Anderson, Elizabeth S. ;
Rubinstein, Jay T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2015, 54 (02) :114-123
[5]   Music Perception of Adolescents Using Electroacoustic Hearing [J].
Driscoll, Virginia D. ;
Welhaven, Anne E. ;
Gfeller, Kate ;
Oleson, Jacob ;
Olszewski, Carol P. .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2016, 37 (02) :E141-E147
[6]   Speech Production Accuracy and Variability in Young Cochlear Implant Recipients: Comparisons With Typically Developing Age-Peers [J].
Ertmer, David J. ;
Goffman, Lisa .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2011, 54 (01) :177-189
[7]  
Etymotic Research, 2005, BAMFORD KOWAL BENCH
[8]   Psychophysical threshold variability in cochlear implant subjects [J].
Ferguson, WD ;
Collins, LM ;
Smith, DW .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2003, 180 (1-2) :101-113
[9]   Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: Advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing [J].
Gantz, BJ ;
Turner, C ;
Gfeller, KE ;
Lowder, MW .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2005, 115 (05) :796-802
[10]  
Gfeller K, 2000, J Am Acad Audiol, V11, P390