Fog harvesting: combination and comparison of different methods to maximize the collection efficiency

被引:19
|
作者
Sharifvaghefi, Seyyedmajid [1 ]
Kazerooni, Hanif [2 ]
机构
[1] Sharif Univ Technol, Dept Chem & Petr Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Tehran Polytech, Dept Chem Engn, Tehran, Iran
来源
SN APPLIED SCIENCES | 2021年 / 3卷 / 04期
关键词
Fog harvesting; Efficiency; Contact angle; Vertical wires; Hydrophobic layer; Electric field;
D O I
10.1007/s42452-021-04518-3
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Fog harvesting is an unconventional source of water that can be used in some regions with water scarcity to overcome water shortages. The most commonly used collectors are meshes which have intrinsic limitations, the most important of which are clogging and aerodynamic deviation of droplets around the wires. Here, three techniques are compared and combined to overcome these limitations, i.e., replacing the mesh with an array of vertical wires, addition of a hydrophobic layer to the wires, and forcing the ionized droplets to move toward the wires by applying an electric field. The combination of these techniques was found to result in higher fog harvesting efficiency compared to each individual method with the highest impact from the addition of the electric field. The combined methods lead to a 60-fold increase in fog harvesting efficiency compared to meshes. The findings showed that when the fog droplets are forced in an electric field toward the wires, the shading coefficient for collectors can be increased to 1 from 0.55 (maximum for collectors without the electric field) without affecting the fog harvesting efficiency, allowing for lower construction cost of the collectors. Addition of the electric field showed two distinctive promotional effects. First, increasing the aerodynamic efficiency and second, reducing the size of droplets sliding down the wires by disturbing the three-phase contact line and reducing the contact angle hysteresis and the pinning force. Energy analysis shows that this technique can be 100 times more energy efficient compared to the conventional atmospheric water generators.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Several Numerical Methods for Fog Prediction
    G. A. Zarochentsev
    K. G. Rubinstein
    V. I. Bychkova
    R. Yu. Ignatov
    Yu. I. Yusupov
    Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics, 2019, 32 : 193 - 201
  • [42] Collection efficiency and particle loss of virtual impactors with different methods of increasing pressure drop
    Lim, K.S.
    Lee, K.W.
    Journal of Aerosol Science, 2006, 37 (10): : 1188 - 1197
  • [43] Collection efficiency and particle loss of virtual impactors with different methods of increasing pressure drop
    Lim, K. S.
    Lee, K. W.
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 2006, 37 (10) : 1188 - 1197
  • [44] Collection and analysis of organic acids in exhaust gas. Comparison of different methods
    Zervas, E
    Montagne, X
    Lahaye, J
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 33 (29) : 4953 - 4962
  • [45] Comparison of different collection procedures and two methods for DNA isolation from saliva
    Durdiakova, Jaroslava
    Kamodyova, Natalia
    Ostatnikova, Daniela
    Vlkova, Barbora
    Celec, Peter
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2012, 50 (04) : 643 - 647
  • [46] COMBINATION OF FACTORS OF DIFFERENT EFFICIENCY
    Waite, Warren C.
    JOURNAL OF FARM ECONOMICS, 1936, 18 (04): : 743 - 745
  • [47] Enhancing fog collection by optimizing wettability combination and fork-row collector arrangement: light and heavy fog
    Zhang, Ming
    Xiao, Menghan
    Li, Chuan
    Li, Dingchen
    Li, Jiawei
    Yu, Kexun
    Pan, Yuan
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 2023, 56 (49)
  • [48] Comparison of flocculation methods for harvesting Dunaliella
    Pirwitz, Kristin
    Rihko-Struckmann, Liisa
    Sundmacher, Kai
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 196 : 145 - 152
  • [49] COMPARISON OF HARVESTING METHODS FOR ISLET TRANSPLANTATION
    GRIFFIN, SM
    ALDERSON, D
    FARNDON, JR
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1986, 73 (09) : 712 - 715
  • [50] The comparison of different irrigation methods on yield and water use efficiency of the jujube
    Wang, Cheng
    Bai, Dan
    Li, Yibo
    Yao, Baolin
    Feng, Yaqin
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2021, 252