Fog harvesting: combination and comparison of different methods to maximize the collection efficiency

被引:19
|
作者
Sharifvaghefi, Seyyedmajid [1 ]
Kazerooni, Hanif [2 ]
机构
[1] Sharif Univ Technol, Dept Chem & Petr Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Tehran Polytech, Dept Chem Engn, Tehran, Iran
来源
SN APPLIED SCIENCES | 2021年 / 3卷 / 04期
关键词
Fog harvesting; Efficiency; Contact angle; Vertical wires; Hydrophobic layer; Electric field;
D O I
10.1007/s42452-021-04518-3
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Fog harvesting is an unconventional source of water that can be used in some regions with water scarcity to overcome water shortages. The most commonly used collectors are meshes which have intrinsic limitations, the most important of which are clogging and aerodynamic deviation of droplets around the wires. Here, three techniques are compared and combined to overcome these limitations, i.e., replacing the mesh with an array of vertical wires, addition of a hydrophobic layer to the wires, and forcing the ionized droplets to move toward the wires by applying an electric field. The combination of these techniques was found to result in higher fog harvesting efficiency compared to each individual method with the highest impact from the addition of the electric field. The combined methods lead to a 60-fold increase in fog harvesting efficiency compared to meshes. The findings showed that when the fog droplets are forced in an electric field toward the wires, the shading coefficient for collectors can be increased to 1 from 0.55 (maximum for collectors without the electric field) without affecting the fog harvesting efficiency, allowing for lower construction cost of the collectors. Addition of the electric field showed two distinctive promotional effects. First, increasing the aerodynamic efficiency and second, reducing the size of droplets sliding down the wires by disturbing the three-phase contact line and reducing the contact angle hysteresis and the pinning force. Energy analysis shows that this technique can be 100 times more energy efficient compared to the conventional atmospheric water generators.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hydrophilic nanofibers in fog collectors for increased water harvesting efficiency
    Knapczyk-Korczak, Joanna
    Szewczyk, Piotr K.
    Ura, Daniel P.
    Berent, Katarzyna
    Stachewicz, Urszula
    RSC ADVANCES, 2020, 10 (38) : 22335 - 22342
  • [22] METHODS FOR COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF PESTICIDES AND OTHER ORGANICS IN FOG
    GLOTFELTY, DE
    SEIBER, JN
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1984, 188 (AUG): : 100 - PEST
  • [23] Comparison of insect detection efficiency by different detection methods
    Jian, Fuji
    Doak, Sara
    Jayas, Digvir S.
    Fields, Paul G.
    White, Noel D. G.
    JOURNAL OF STORED PRODUCTS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 : 138 - 142
  • [24] Soybean breeding: comparison of the efficiency of different selection methods
    Miladinovic, Jegor
    Burton, Joe W.
    Tubic, Svetlana Balesevic
    Miladinovic, Dragana
    Djordjevic, Vuk
    Djukic, Vojin
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY, 2011, 35 (05) : 469 - 480
  • [25] Comparison of different harvesting methods from the flat and long bones of rats
    von See, C.
    Ruecker, M.
    Kampmann, A.
    Kokemueller, H.
    Bormann, K. -H.
    Gellrich, N. -C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 48 (08): : 607 - 612
  • [26] Deconstructing plasma fog collection technology: an experimental study on factors impacting collection efficiency
    Li, Dingchen
    Li, Chuan
    Xiao, Menghan
    Li, Jiawei
    Yang, Zhiwen
    Fu, Qixiong
    Zhang, Ming
    Yu, Kexun
    Pan, Yuan
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 2024, 57 (07)
  • [27] Evaluation of the geometrical parameters of collector mesh on the fog collection efficiency
    Zefrehei, Atieh Almasi
    Sheikhzadeh, Mohammad
    Pishevar, Ahmad Reza
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL TEXTILES, 2022, 51 (2_SUPPL) : 3466S - 3492S
  • [28] Design of water harvesting towers and projections for water collection from fog and condensation
    Bhushan, Bharat
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2020, 378 (2167):
  • [29] Comparison of different methods for collection of volatile chemical markers from fungi
    Larsen, TO
    Frisvad, JC
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 1995, 24 (02) : 135 - 144
  • [30] A comparison of different waste collection methods: Environmental impacts and occupational risks
    Rossi, Marta
    Papetti, Alessandra
    Germani, Michele
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 368