Demands for UN and Non-UN Peacekeeping Nonvoluntary versus Voluntary Contributions to a Public Good

被引:45
|
作者
Gaibulloev, Khusrav [1 ]
Sandler, Todd [1 ]
Shimizu, Hirofumi [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Dallas, Sch Econ Polit & Policy Sci, Richardson, TX 75083 USA
[2] Natl Def Acad, Dept Publ Policy, Yokosuka, Kanagawa 239, Japan
关键词
UN peacekeeping; non-UN peacekeeping; pure public goods; joint products; three-way fixed effects; voluntary contributions; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; CIVIL-WARS;
D O I
10.1177/0022002709338509
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
This article presents alternative estimates for the demand for UN and non-UN peacekeeping. Generally, three-way fixed-effects models, which account for the country, year, and conflict region, provide the best estimates. The demand for UN peacekeeping is primarily influenced by the contributions of other nations (i.e., spillins), with spillin elasticity not significantly different from 1. For non-UN peacekeeping, both spillins and country-specific interests in the conflict region influence contributions. These peacekeepers' interests include trade and FDI concerns, along with proximity to the conflict. Peacekeeping missions appear partitioned: UN missions for global public benefits and non-UN missions for peacekeeper-specific benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 852
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条