Evaluating glycaemic control in patients poorly controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs in real-world setting: Results from assessing the Appropriate Timing of Type 2 diAbetes INtensification (ATTAIN)

被引:1
|
作者
Jude, Edward B. [1 ]
O'Leary, Caroline [2 ]
Myland, Melissa [2 ]
Nixon, Mark [2 ]
Gooch, Nick [3 ]
Shaunik, Alka [4 ]
Lew, Elisheva [5 ]
机构
[1] Tameside Gen Hosp, Diabet Ctr, Ashton Under Lyne, England
[2] IQVIA, London, England
[3] Sanofi, Guildford, Surrey, England
[4] Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ USA
[5] Sanofi, Chilly Mazarin, France
关键词
adherence; electronic medical records; glycaemic control; oral antidiabetic drugs; real-world study; treatment intensification; type 2 diabetes melitus; CLINICAL INERTIA; ADHERENCE; CARE; ASSOCIATION; PERSISTENCE; MANAGEMENT; MEDICATION; INSULIN; TIME;
D O I
10.1002/edm2.94
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) fail to achieve glycaemic control despite recommended treatment strategies to reduce glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). This real-world retrospective cohort study compared HbA1c change and treatment patterns between those intensifying and not intensifying therapy with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). Materials and methods: Patients suboptimally controlled on OADs (>58 mmol/mol [>7.5%] or >64 mmol/mol [>8.0%] for high risk, index 1) were included from IQVIA Medical Research Data. Intensifiers within 12 months of index 1 were matched (1:1) to nonintensifiers. Primary outcomes were HbA1c change and proportion of participants achieving HbA1c targets 6 and 12 months post-index 2 (date of intensification [intensifiers] or pseudodate [nonintensifiers]). Therapy adherence was also assessed. Results: A total of 10 832 participants (5539 intensifiers and 5293 nonintensifiers) were included. Mean HbA1c decrease from baseline to 6 months was -1.13% (intensifiers) vs -0.75% (nonintensifiers), with no substantial further change at 12 months. Cox proportional hazards (PH) analysis suggested a nearly 20% greater chance of target achievement at 6 months for intensifiers vs nonintensifiers (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.79 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-0.86]), which was similar at 12 months (HR: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.74-0.86]). Intensifiers tended towards greater adherence to baseline therapy (90% [standard deviation (SD): 14.9] vs nonintensifiers 87% [SD: 16.0]), which decreased following intensification. Conclusions: Significant reductions in HbA1c were evident at 6 months and were greater in intensifiers vs nonintensifiers. Little additional clinical benefit was seen 12 months postintensification. Despite good treatment adherence, many participants failed to achieve target HbA1c; actions beyond improved adherence are needed to improve suboptimal HbA1c.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Metabolic Control and Adherence to Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Using IDegLira in a Real-World Setting
    Melzer-Cohen, Cheli
    Chodick, Gabriel
    Naftelberg, Shiran
    Shehadeh, Naim
    Karasik, Avraham
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2020, 11 (01) : 185 - 196
  • [12] Titration of insulin glargine 100 U/mL when added to oral antidiabetic drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of the TOP-1 real-world study
    Stefan Pscherer
    Helmut Anderten
    Martin Pfohl
    Andreas Fritsche
    Anja Borck
    Katrin Pegelow
    Peter Bramlage
    Jochen Seufert
    Acta Diabetologica, 2020, 57 : 89 - 99
  • [13] Titration of insulin glargine 100 U/mL when added to oral antidiabetic drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of the TOP-1 real-world study
    Pscherer, Stefan
    Anderten, Helmut
    Pfohl, Martin
    Fritsche, Andreas
    Borck, Anja
    Pegelow, Katrin
    Bramlage, Peter
    Seufert, Jochen
    ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2020, 57 (01) : 89 - 99
  • [14] Comparison of glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes on basal insulin and fixed combination oral antidiabetic treatment: results of a pilot study
    De Mattia, G.
    Laurenti, O.
    Moretti, A.
    ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2009, 46 (01) : 67 - 73
  • [15] Comparison of glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes on basal insulin and fixed combination oral antidiabetic treatment: results of a pilot study
    G. De Mattia
    O. Laurenti
    A. Moretti
    Acta Diabetologica, 2009, 46
  • [16] Adding Prandial Insulin to Basal Insulin Plus Oral Antidiabetic Drugs in Chinese Patients with Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Open-Label, Single-Arm Study
    Jin, Yujing
    Sun, Xiaowei
    Zhao, Xichen
    Zhu, Tiehong
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2017, 8 (03) : 611 - 621
  • [17] A Real-World Observational Study of Time to Treatment Intensification Among Elderly Patients with Inadequately Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Ajmera, Mayank
    Raval, Amit
    Zhou, Steve
    Wei, Wenhui
    Bhattacharya, Rituparna
    Pan, Chunshen
    Sambamoorthi, Usha
    JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2015, 21 (12) : 1184 - +
  • [18] Clinical Experience with Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 Treatment in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Poorly Controlled on Oral Antidiabetic Drugs: The Turkish PRESENT Study
    Guler, Serdar
    Tuna, Siebnem
    Bech, Ole
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2008, 12 (01) : 4 - 9
  • [19] Effectiveness and tolerability of second-line treatment with vildagliptin versus other oral drugs for type 2 diabetes in a real-world setting in the Middle East: results from the EDGE study
    Saab, Charles
    Al-Saber, Feryal A.
    Haddad, Jihad
    Jallo, Mahir Khalil
    Steitieh, Habib
    Bader, Giovanni
    Ibrahim, Mohamed
    VASCULAR HEALTH AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2015, 11 : 149 - 155
  • [20] Clinical inertia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral antidiabetic drugs: Results from a Japanese cohort study (JDDM53)
    Maegawa, Hiroshi
    Ishigaki, Yasushi
    Langer, Jakob
    Saotome-Nakamura, Ai
    Andersen, Marc
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION, 2021, 12 (03) : 374 - 381