Evaluating glycaemic control in patients poorly controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs in real-world setting: Results from assessing the Appropriate Timing of Type 2 diAbetes INtensification (ATTAIN)

被引:1
|
作者
Jude, Edward B. [1 ]
O'Leary, Caroline [2 ]
Myland, Melissa [2 ]
Nixon, Mark [2 ]
Gooch, Nick [3 ]
Shaunik, Alka [4 ]
Lew, Elisheva [5 ]
机构
[1] Tameside Gen Hosp, Diabet Ctr, Ashton Under Lyne, England
[2] IQVIA, London, England
[3] Sanofi, Guildford, Surrey, England
[4] Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ USA
[5] Sanofi, Chilly Mazarin, France
关键词
adherence; electronic medical records; glycaemic control; oral antidiabetic drugs; real-world study; treatment intensification; type 2 diabetes melitus; CLINICAL INERTIA; ADHERENCE; CARE; ASSOCIATION; PERSISTENCE; MANAGEMENT; MEDICATION; INSULIN; TIME;
D O I
10.1002/edm2.94
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) fail to achieve glycaemic control despite recommended treatment strategies to reduce glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). This real-world retrospective cohort study compared HbA1c change and treatment patterns between those intensifying and not intensifying therapy with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). Materials and methods: Patients suboptimally controlled on OADs (>58 mmol/mol [>7.5%] or >64 mmol/mol [>8.0%] for high risk, index 1) were included from IQVIA Medical Research Data. Intensifiers within 12 months of index 1 were matched (1:1) to nonintensifiers. Primary outcomes were HbA1c change and proportion of participants achieving HbA1c targets 6 and 12 months post-index 2 (date of intensification [intensifiers] or pseudodate [nonintensifiers]). Therapy adherence was also assessed. Results: A total of 10 832 participants (5539 intensifiers and 5293 nonintensifiers) were included. Mean HbA1c decrease from baseline to 6 months was -1.13% (intensifiers) vs -0.75% (nonintensifiers), with no substantial further change at 12 months. Cox proportional hazards (PH) analysis suggested a nearly 20% greater chance of target achievement at 6 months for intensifiers vs nonintensifiers (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.79 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-0.86]), which was similar at 12 months (HR: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.74-0.86]). Intensifiers tended towards greater adherence to baseline therapy (90% [standard deviation (SD): 14.9] vs nonintensifiers 87% [SD: 16.0]), which decreased following intensification. Conclusions: Significant reductions in HbA1c were evident at 6 months and were greater in intensifiers vs nonintensifiers. Little additional clinical benefit was seen 12 months postintensification. Despite good treatment adherence, many participants failed to achieve target HbA1c; actions beyond improved adherence are needed to improve suboptimal HbA1c.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Glycaemic control after treatment intensification in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on two or more non-insulin antidiabetic drugs in a real-world setting
    Canivell, Silvia
    Mata-Cases, Manel
    Real, Jordi
    Franch-Nadal, Josep
    Vlacho, Bogdan
    Khunti, Kamlesh
    Gratacos, Monica
    Mauricio, Didac
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2019, 21 (06) : 1373 - 1380
  • [2] Evaluating Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Suboptimally Controlled on Basal Insulin: UK ATTAIN Real-World Study
    Jude, Edward B.
    Nixon, Mark
    O'Leary, Caroline
    Myland, Melissa
    Gooch, Nick
    Shaunik, Alka
    Lew, Elisheva
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2019, 10 (05) : 1847 - 1858
  • [3] Third-Line Antidiabetic Therapy Intensification Patterns and Glycaemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the USA: A Real-World Study
    Koye, Digsu N.
    Montvida, Olga
    Paul, Sanjoy Ketan
    DRUGS, 2020, 80 (05) : 477 - 487
  • [4] Treatment patterns and satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes newly initiating oral monotherapy with antidiabetic drugs in Japan: results from the prospective Real-world Observational Study on Patient Outcomes in Diabetes (RESPOND)
    Tajima, Atsushi
    Tobe, Keisuke
    Eiki, Jun-ichi
    Origasa, Hideki
    Watada, Hirotaka
    Shimomura, Iichiro
    Tokita, Shigeru
    Kadowaki, Takashi
    BMJ OPEN DIABETES RESEARCH & CARE, 2022, 10 (06)
  • [5] Determinants for inadequate glycaemic control in Chinese patients with mild-to-moderate type 2 diabetes on oral antidiabetic drugs alone
    Zhang Shao-ling
    Chen Zong-cun
    Yan Li
    Chen Li-hong
    Cheng Hua
    Ji Li-nong
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 124 (16) : 2461 - 2468
  • [6] PREDICTORS AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF TREATMENT INTENSIFICATION IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES UNCONTROLLED ON BASAL INSULIN IN A REAL-WORLD SETTING
    Kallenbach, Lee
    Shui, Amy M.
    Cheng, Wendy Y.
    Fan, Tao
    Hu, Wenli
    Zichlin, Miriam L.
    Duh, Mei Sheng
    Ye, Fen
    Levin, Philip A.
    ENDOCRINE PRACTICE, 2018, 24 (09) : 805 - 814
  • [7] Improved glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes initiating or switching to IDegAsp in a real-world setting in China
    Guo, Lixin
    Chen, Liming
    Zhao, Fan
    Liu, Xiaoyun
    Ding, Hongcheng
    Wang, Kun
    Zhong, Xing
    Shankarappa, Vinay Babu
    Chaudhary, Gaurav
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2025, 27 (03) : 1388 - 1396
  • [8] Long-term sustainability of glycaemic achievements with second-line antidiabetic therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes: A real-world study
    Montvida, Olga
    Shaw, Jonathan E.
    Blonde, Lawrence
    Paul, Sanjoy K.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2018, 20 (07) : 1722 - 1731
  • [9] Real-World Adequacy of Glycaemic Control in Treatment-Naive Greek Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Initiating Treatment with Metformin Monotherapy at the Maximum Tolerated Dose: The Reload Study
    Tsimihodimos, Vasilis
    Bargiota, Alexandra
    Pagkalos, Emmanouil M.
    Manes, Christos
    Papas, Aggelos
    Karamousouli, Eugenia
    Voss, Bernd
    Elisaf, Moses S.
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & DIABETES, 2020, 128 (04) : 224 - 230
  • [10] Metabolic Control and Adherence to Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Using IDegLira in a Real-World Setting
    Cheli Melzer-Cohen
    Gabriel Chodick
    Shiran Naftelberg
    Naim Shehadeh
    Avraham Karasik
    Diabetes Therapy, 2020, 11 : 185 - 196