Analytical models for availability evaluation of edge and fog computing nodes

被引:25
作者
Pereira, Paulo [1 ]
Araujo, Jean [2 ]
Melo, Carlos [1 ]
Santos, Vinicius [3 ]
Maciel, Paulo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Ctr Informat, Recife, PE, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Agreste Pernambuco, Garanhuns, PE, Brazil
[3] Inst Fed Educ Ciencia & Tecnol Goias, Luziania, Go, Brazil
关键词
Fog computing; Edge computing; Availability evaluation; Markov chain; Analytical models; Capacity-oriented availability; FRAMEWORK; INTERNET;
D O I
10.1007/s11227-021-03672-0
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Although cloud computing environments increase availability, reliability, and performance, many emerging technologies demand latency-aware networks for real-time data processing. For instance, the Internet of Things environments are composed of many connected devices that generate data for applications, where many of them are latency-sensitive, such as facial recognition security systems in airports or train stations. To overcome the latency of the cloud infrastructure, researchers introduced the edge and fog computing paradigms in order to increase computing power between the cloud and devices. In this study, we propose analytical availability models; also, we evaluate the availability of physical edge and fog nodes running applications. To finish, we perform a capacity-oriented availability and a cost evaluation comparing edge and fog environments. Some of the results show that we can improve the availability from 2.96 number of nines to 5.93, by using our analytical models to plan the infrastructure. These models aim at supporting engineers and analysts to plan fault-tolerant edge and fog environments.
引用
收藏
页码:9905 / 9933
页数:29
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Application health monitoring for extreme-scale resiliency using cooperative fault management
    Agarwal, Pratul K.
    Naughton, Thomas
    Park, Byung H.
    Bernholdt, David E.
    Hursey, Joshua J.
    Geist, Al
    [J]. CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2020, 32 (02)
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2008, Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences
  • [3] Araujo E, 2019, IEEE SYS MAN CYBERN, P2121, DOI 10.1109/SMC.2019.8914032
  • [4] A Generic Stochastic Model for Resource Availability in Fog Computing Environments
    Battula, Sudheer Kumar
    OaReilly, Malgorzata M.
    Garg, Saurabh
    Montgomery, James
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS, 2021, 32 (04) : 960 - 974
  • [5] Potentials, trends, and prospects in edge technologies: Fog, cloudlet, mobile edge, and micro data centers
    Bilal, Kashif
    Khalid, Osman
    Erbad, Aiman
    Khan, Samee U.
    [J]. COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2018, 130 : 94 - 120
  • [6] Towards Virtual Machine Migration in Fog Computing
    Bittencourt, Luiz F.
    Lopes, Marcio Moraes
    Petri, Ioan
    Rana, Omer F.
    [J]. 2015 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON P2P, PARALLEL, GRID, CLOUD AND INTERNET COMPUTING (3PGCIC), 2015, : 1 - 8
  • [7] Brilhante J, 2014, IEEE SYS MAN CYBERN, P2669, DOI 10.1109/SMC.2014.6974330
  • [8] Caliri G.V., 2000, Cmg-Conference-, V1, P31, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-57157-2_1, 10.1007/978-3-642-57157-2_1]
  • [9] VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and age
    Cao, Qiong
    Shen, Li
    Xie, Weidi
    Parkhi, Omkar M.
    Zisserman, Andrew
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS 2018 13TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATIC FACE & GESTURE RECOGNITION (FG 2018), 2018, : 67 - 74
  • [10] Dynamic Urban Surveillance Video Stream Processing Using Fog Computing
    Chen, Ning
    Chen, Yu
    You, Yang
    Ling, Haibin
    Liang, Pengpeng
    Zimmermann, Roger
    [J]. 2016 IEEE SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMEDIA BIG DATA (BIGMM), 2016, : 105 - 112