Quality of life after total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis or proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis

被引:62
作者
van Duijvendijk, P
Slors, JFM
Taat, CW
Oosterveld, P
Sprangers, MAG
Obertop, H
Vasen, HFA
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Psychol Med, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01442.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Knowledge of postoperative health status is important in decision-making about the type of operation necessary in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). This study compared the quality of life (QoL) between patients with an ileorectal anastomosis (group 1) and those with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (group 2), Methods: QoL was assessed with both a generic questionnaire (Short Form-36 Health Survey; SF-36) and a disease-specific questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Colorectal QoL Questionnaire; EORTC QLQ-CR38), The SF-36 consists of 36 items representing eight generic health domains, and the EORTC QLQ-CR38 comprises 38 items representing disease-specific health domains. Both questionnaires were distributed among 323 patients with FAP known. at the Dutch Polyposis Registry who had previously undergone either operation, The results of the SF-36 were compared with the scores of age- and sex-matched respondents from the general population. Results: Some 279 patients (86 per cent), 161 in group 1 and 118 in group 2, completed the questionnaire. Generic and disease-specific QoL was the same for groups 1 and 2. The SF-36 scores of both groups were significantly lower than those of the general population. Conclusion: There were no differences with respect to health status between patients in groups 1 and 2, and preference for either procedure cannot be based on QoL.
引用
收藏
页码:590 / 596
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations [J].
Aaronson, NK ;
Muller, M ;
Cohen, PDA ;
Essink-Bot, ML ;
Fekkes, M ;
Sanderman, R ;
Sprangers, MAG ;
Velde, AT ;
Verrips, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (11) :1055-1068
[2]  
Bussey HJR., 1975, Familial polyposis coli: family studies, histopathology, differential diagnosis and results of treatment
[3]   Quality of life after prophylactic colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis [J].
Church, JM ;
Fazio, VW ;
Lavery, IC ;
Oakley, JR ;
Milsom, J ;
McGannon, E .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1996, 39 (12) :1404-1408
[4]  
Cohen J., 1998, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, V2nd
[5]   ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSES COMPLICATIONS AND FUNCTION IN 1005 PATIENTS [J].
FAZIO, VW ;
ZIV, Y ;
CHURCH, JM ;
OAKLEY, JR ;
LAVERY, IC ;
MILSOM, JW ;
SCHROEDER, TK .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 222 (02) :120-127
[6]   FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME IN HANDSEWN VERSUS STAPLED ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS [J].
GOZZETTI, G ;
POGGIOLI, G ;
MARCHETTI, F ;
LAURETI, S ;
GRAZI, GL ;
MASTRORILLI, M ;
SELLERI, S ;
STOCCHI, L ;
DISIMONE, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 168 (04) :325-329
[7]  
JAGELMAN DG, 1991, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V38, P535
[8]  
KOHLER LW, 1991, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V101, P679
[9]   The causation and treatment of multiple adenomatosis of the colon [J].
Lockhart-Mummery, TP .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1934, 99 :178-184
[10]   COMPARISON OF MORBIDITY AND FUNCTION AFTER COLECTOMY WITH ILEORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS OR RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY FOR FAMILIAL ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSIS [J].
MADDEN, MV ;
NEALE, KF ;
NICHOLLS, RJ ;
LANDGREBE, JC ;
CHAPMAN, PD ;
BUSSEY, HJR ;
THOMSON, JPS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 78 (07) :789-792