Prediction of arsenic removal in aqueous solutions with non-neural network algorithms

被引:8
作者
Hafsa, Noor [1 ]
Al-Yaari, Mohammed [2 ]
Rushd, Sayeed [2 ]
机构
[1] King Faisal Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Al Hasa, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Faisal Univ, Dept Chem Engn, POB 380, Al Hasa 31982, Saudi Arabia
关键词
adsorption; arsenic removal; random forest; support vector regression; water quality; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; LEAF-AREA INDEX; DRINKING-WATER; WASTE-WATER; AS(III); AS(V); NANOPARTICLES; OPTIMIZATION; ADSORPTION;
D O I
10.1002/cjce.23966
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Despite some well-known limitations of artificial neural network (ANN), the basic ANN and its derivatives are frequently used to predict the removal efficiency of different heavy metals like arsenic (As) using various adsorbents, including bio-adsorbents. Notable examples of applying non-neural network (NN) approaches, such as support vector regression (SVR) and random forest (RF), are almost non-existent in theliterature. In the current study, the suitability of these modules to predict As removal efficiency was investigated based on seven independent experimental data sets. The SVR and RF experiments with the merged datasets of experimental and interpolated data points demonstrated their effectivity for the prediction. Specifically, the RF method achieved 97.3% Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (SRCC) and 95.9% R-2 on average, whereas its SVR counterpart exhibited average performances of 96.3% SRCC and 93.9% R-2 on a hold-out test set. A general method based on the natural cubic spline technique was introduced to interpolate the experimental data points. Compared to the ANN methodology, the non-NN approaches involved tuning fewer hyperparameters and easier training processes in the R open-source framework. Furthermore, this kind of economical application of the machine learning algorithms allowed ranking the experimental parameters based on their relative contribution in the As removal efficiency. The study showed that the following parameters are the most influential ones, in decreasing order: pH, adsorbent dose, temperature, agitation time, and initial As concentration.
引用
收藏
页码:S135 / S146
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Comparative study of different B-spline approaches for functional data [J].
Aguilera, A. M. ;
Aguilera-Morillo, M. C. .
MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2013, 58 (7-8) :1568-1579
[2]   Machine learning models to predict bottom hole pressure in multi-phase flow in vertical oil production wells [J].
Ahmadi, Mohammad Ali ;
Chen, Zhangxin .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 97 (11) :2928-2940
[3]  
Akin I, 2012, J HAZARD MATER, V235, P62, DOI [10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.06.024, 10.1016/j.jhazmat2012.06.024]
[4]  
Alakbari F., 2016, SPE MIDDL E ART LIFT, DOI [10.2118/184208-MS, DOI 10.2118/184208-MS]
[5]  
Ansari R., 2007, E-J CHEM, P103, DOI DOI 10.1155/2007/829187
[6]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[7]   Removal of arsenic from drinking water: A comparative study between electrocoagulation-microfiltration and chemical coagulation-microfiltration processes [J].
Calderon Molgora, Cesar ;
Martin Dominguez, Alejandra ;
Mundo Avila, Eloy ;
Drogui, Patrick ;
Buelna, Gerardo .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 118 :645-651
[8]  
Ceh M, 2018, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V7, DOI [10.3390/ijgi705168, 10.3390/ijgi7050168]
[9]   Bayesian modeling approach for characterizing groundwater arsenic contamination in the Mekong River basin [J].
Cha, YoonKyung ;
Kim, Young Mo ;
Choi, Jae-Woo ;
Sthiannopkao, Suthipong ;
Cho, Kyung Hwa .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2016, 143 :50-56
[10]  
Chung Jin-Yong, 2014, J Prev Med Public Health, V47, P253, DOI 10.3961/jpmph.14.036