RPchain: A Blockchain-Based Academic Social Networking Service for Credible Reputation Building

被引:11
作者
Qin, Dong [1 ]
Wang, Chenxu [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Yiming [2 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Software Engn, Xian, Shanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, MoE Key Lab Intelligent Networks & Network Secur, Xian, Peoples R China
来源
BLOCKCHAIN - ICBC 2018 | 2018年 / 10974卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Blockchain; Academic social network; Reputation building; Proof of reputation;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-94478-4_13
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The development of the Web 2.0 technology has brought the prosperity of open science which is devoted to making scientific research, data and dissemination accessible to all levels of an inquiring society, amateur or professional. One of the challenges faced by open science is how to build the scholarly reputation of participants credibly and fairly. Existing academic social networking services use peer reviews to address this problem. However, there are still some drawbacks of these services. They are not friendly to the general public and lack effective incentive mechanisms to attract ordinary users. Moreover, these centralized services have the risks that review records might be tampered or lost. In this paper, we present a blockchain-based academic social network service model which has irrevocable peer review records, traceability of reputation building and appropriate incentives for content contribution. In order to achieve these goals, we propose a novel consensus algorithm named proof of reputation (PoRe) which utilizes the reputation of participants for consensus. Finally, we implement a prototype of the model and empirically validate its security and effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 198
页数:16
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, EMERGING REPUTATION
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, SOC EPISTEMOL, DOI DOI 10.1080/02691728.2010.498929
[3]   Cryptocurrencies Without Proof of Work [J].
Bentov, Iddo ;
Gabizon, Ariel ;
Mizrahi, Alex .
FINANCIAL CRYPTOGRAPHY AND DATA SECURITY, FC 2016, 2016, 9604 :142-157
[4]  
Blei D, LECT NOTES PRINCETON
[5]  
Dennis R, 2016, INT J DIGIT SOC, V7, P1123
[6]   Fallout and miss in journal peer review [J].
Egghe, L. ;
Bornmann, Lutz .
JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 2013, 69 (03) :411-416
[7]  
Eyal I, 2016, NSDI
[8]   Majority Is Not Enough: Bitcoin Mining Is Vulnerable [J].
Eyal, Ittay ;
Sirer, Emin Guen .
FINANCIAL CRYPTOGRAPHY AND DATA SECURITY, FC 2014, 2014, 8437 :436-454
[9]   Defining and Characterizing Open Peer Review: A Review of the Literature [J].
Ford, Emily .
JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING, 2013, 44 (04) :311-326
[10]   Learning, Teaching, and Scholarship in a Digital Age Web 2.0 and Classroom Research: What Path Should We Take Now? [J].
Greenhow, Christine ;
Robelia, Beth ;
Hughes, Joan E. .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2009, 38 (04) :246-259