Statistical controversies in clinical research: assessing pathologic complete response as a trial-level surrogate end point for early-stage breast cancer

被引:40
作者
Korn, E. L. [1 ]
Sachs, M. C. [1 ]
McShane, L. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Biometr Res Branch, Div Canc Treatment & Diag, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
breast cancer; pathologic complete response; surrogate end point; trial-level surrogate end point; randomized clinical trial; screening trials; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; OPEN-LABEL; MULTICENTER; TRASTUZUMAB; LAPATINIB; NEOALTTO;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdv507
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
A trial-level surrogate end point for a randomized clinical trial may allow assessment of the relative benefits of the treatment to be performed at an earlier time point and potentially with a smaller sample size. However, determining whether an end point is a reliable trial-level surrogate based on results of previous trials is not straightforward. The question of trial-level surrogacy is easily confused with the question of individual-level surrogacy, and this confusion can lead to controversy. A recent example concerns the evaluation of pathologic complete response (pCR) as a surrogate for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in early-stage breast cancer. The differences between individual-level surrogacy (i.e. for patients receiving a specific treatment, the surrogate end point predicts the definitive end point) and trial-level surrogacy (the results of the trial for the surrogate end point predict the results of the trial for the definitive end point) are discussed. Trial-level data used in two previous meta-analyses evaluating pCR as a trial-level surrogate for EFS and OS were re-analyzed using methods that appropriately account for the variability in pCR rates as well as the variability in the hazard ratios for EFS and OS. There is no evidence that pCR is a trial-level surrogate for EFS or OS, nor is there evidence that pCR could be used reliably to screen out nonpromising agents from further drug development. At present, neoadjuvant RCTs should continue to follow patients to observe EFS and OS to assess clinical benefit, and they should be designed with sufficient sample size to reliably assess EFS. However, one cannot rule out the possibility that future meta-analyses involving more trials and in which the patient population or class of treatments is restricted could suggest the validity of pCR as a trial-level surrogate for EFS or OS in some focused settings.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 15
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Trial-level prediction of long-term outcome based on pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer (EBC) [J].
Nekljudova, Valentina ;
Loibl, Sibylle ;
von Minckwitz, Gunter ;
Schneeweiss, Andreas ;
Gluck, Stefan ;
Crane, Richard ;
Li, Huiling ;
Luo, Xiaolong .
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2018, 71 :194-198
[2]   High Pathologic Complete Response in Her2-Positive, Early-Stage Breast Cancer to a Novel Nonanthracycline Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy [J].
Zelnak, Amelia B. ;
Nikolinakos, Petros ;
Srinivasiah, Jayanthi ;
Jonas, William ;
Pippas, Andrew ;
Liu, Yuan ;
Li, Xiaoxian ;
Torres, Mylin ;
O'Regan, Ruth M. .
CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2015, 15 (01) :31-36
[3]   Impact of pathologic complete response on survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: a population-based analysis [J].
LeVasseur, Nathalie ;
Sun, J. ;
Gondara, L. ;
Diocee, R. ;
Speers, C. ;
Lohrisch, C. ;
Chia, S. .
JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 146 (02) :529-536
[4]   Statistical controversies in clinical research: an initial evaluation of a surrogate end point using a single randomized clinical trial and the Prentice criteria [J].
Heller, G. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 (10) :2012-2016
[5]   Surrogate endpoints for early-stage breast cancer: a review of the state of the art, controversies, and future prospects [J].
Gion, Maria ;
Manuel Perez-Garcia, Jose ;
Llombart-Cussac, Antonio ;
Sampayo-Cordero, Miguel ;
Cortes, Javier ;
Malfettone, Andrea .
THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 13
[6]   Predictors of Pathologic Complete Response with Neoadjuvant Chemo-Immunotherapy in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer [J].
Perry, Lauren M. ;
Sevilimedu, Varadan ;
Polidorio, Natalia ;
Abuhadra, Nour ;
Morrow, Monica ;
Plitas, George ;
Downs-Canner, Stephanie .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, :3991-4001
[7]   Inflammation-related biomarkers as predictors of pathological complete response in early-stage breast cancer [J].
Oraianthi Fiste ;
Evangelos Mavrothalassitis ;
Alexandros Kokkalis ;
Maximilian Anagnostakis ;
Georgia Gomatou ;
Athanasios Kontogiannis ;
Dimitra Karaviti ;
Eleftheria Karaviti ;
Nikolaos Konstantinos Syrigos ;
Athanasios Kotsakis ;
Elias Alexandros Kotteas .
Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2025, 27 (6) :2453-2460
[8]   A correlation analysis to assess event-free survival as a trial-level surrogate for overall survival in early breast cancer [J].
Gyawali, Bishal ;
D'Andrea, Elvira ;
Franklin, Jessica M. ;
Kesselheim, Aaron S. .
ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2021, 32
[9]   Impact of pathologic complete response on survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: a population-based analysis [J].
Nathalie LeVasseur ;
J. Sun ;
L. Gondara ;
R. Diocee ;
C. Speers ;
C. Lohrisch ;
S. Chia .
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2020, 146 :529-536
[10]   Neoadjuvant Dual HER2-Targeted Therapy With Lapatinib and Trastuzumab Improves Pathologic Complete Response in Patients With Early Stage HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Prospective Clinical Trials [J].
Hicks, Mellissa ;
Macrae, Erin R. ;
Abdel-Rasoul, Mahmoud ;
Layman, Rachel ;
Friedman, Susan ;
Querry, Jenny ;
Lustberg, Maryam ;
Ramaswamy, Bhuvaneswari ;
Mrozek, Ewa ;
Shapiro, Charles ;
Wesolowski, Robert .
ONCOLOGIST, 2015, 20 (04) :337-343