Statistical controversies in clinical research: assessing pathologic complete response as a trial-level surrogate end point for early-stage breast cancer

被引:39
|
作者
Korn, E. L. [1 ]
Sachs, M. C. [1 ]
McShane, L. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Biometr Res Branch, Div Canc Treatment & Diag, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
breast cancer; pathologic complete response; surrogate end point; trial-level surrogate end point; randomized clinical trial; screening trials; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; OPEN-LABEL; MULTICENTER; TRASTUZUMAB; LAPATINIB; NEOALTTO;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdv507
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
A trial-level surrogate end point for a randomized clinical trial may allow assessment of the relative benefits of the treatment to be performed at an earlier time point and potentially with a smaller sample size. However, determining whether an end point is a reliable trial-level surrogate based on results of previous trials is not straightforward. The question of trial-level surrogacy is easily confused with the question of individual-level surrogacy, and this confusion can lead to controversy. A recent example concerns the evaluation of pathologic complete response (pCR) as a surrogate for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in early-stage breast cancer. The differences between individual-level surrogacy (i.e. for patients receiving a specific treatment, the surrogate end point predicts the definitive end point) and trial-level surrogacy (the results of the trial for the surrogate end point predict the results of the trial for the definitive end point) are discussed. Trial-level data used in two previous meta-analyses evaluating pCR as a trial-level surrogate for EFS and OS were re-analyzed using methods that appropriately account for the variability in pCR rates as well as the variability in the hazard ratios for EFS and OS. There is no evidence that pCR is a trial-level surrogate for EFS or OS, nor is there evidence that pCR could be used reliably to screen out nonpromising agents from further drug development. At present, neoadjuvant RCTs should continue to follow patients to observe EFS and OS to assess clinical benefit, and they should be designed with sufficient sample size to reliably assess EFS. However, one cannot rule out the possibility that future meta-analyses involving more trials and in which the patient population or class of treatments is restricted could suggest the validity of pCR as a trial-level surrogate for EFS or OS in some focused settings.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 15
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trial-level prediction of long-term outcome based on pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer (EBC)
    Nekljudova, Valentina
    Loibl, Sibylle
    von Minckwitz, Gunter
    Schneeweiss, Andreas
    Gluck, Stefan
    Crane, Richard
    Li, Huiling
    Luo, Xiaolong
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2018, 71 : 194 - 198
  • [2] High Pathologic Complete Response in Her2-Positive, Early-Stage Breast Cancer to a Novel Nonanthracycline Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Zelnak, Amelia B.
    Nikolinakos, Petros
    Srinivasiah, Jayanthi
    Jonas, William
    Pippas, Andrew
    Liu, Yuan
    Li, Xiaoxian
    Torres, Mylin
    O'Regan, Ruth M.
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2015, 15 (01) : 31 - 36
  • [3] Impact of pathologic complete response on survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: a population-based analysis
    LeVasseur, Nathalie
    Sun, J.
    Gondara, L.
    Diocee, R.
    Speers, C.
    Lohrisch, C.
    Chia, S.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 146 (02) : 529 - 536
  • [4] Statistical controversies in clinical research: an initial evaluation of a surrogate end point using a single randomized clinical trial and the Prentice criteria
    Heller, G.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 (10) : 2012 - 2016
  • [5] Surrogate endpoints for early-stage breast cancer: a review of the state of the art, controversies, and future prospects
    Gion, Maria
    Manuel Perez-Garcia, Jose
    Llombart-Cussac, Antonio
    Sampayo-Cordero, Miguel
    Cortes, Javier
    Malfettone, Andrea
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 13
  • [6] Predictors of Pathologic Complete Response with Neoadjuvant Chemo-Immunotherapy in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Perry, Lauren M.
    Sevilimedu, Varadan
    Polidorio, Natalia
    Abuhadra, Nour
    Morrow, Monica
    Plitas, George
    Downs-Canner, Stephanie
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, : 3991 - 4001
  • [7] Inflammation-related biomarkers as predictors of pathological complete response in early-stage breast cancer
    Oraianthi Fiste
    Evangelos Mavrothalassitis
    Alexandros Kokkalis
    Maximilian Anagnostakis
    Georgia Gomatou
    Athanasios Kontogiannis
    Dimitra Karaviti
    Eleftheria Karaviti
    Nikolaos Konstantinos Syrigos
    Athanasios Kotsakis
    Elias Alexandros Kotteas
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2025, 27 (6) : 2453 - 2460
  • [8] A correlation analysis to assess event-free survival as a trial-level surrogate for overall survival in early breast cancer
    Gyawali, Bishal
    D'Andrea, Elvira
    Franklin, Jessica M.
    Kesselheim, Aaron S.
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2021, 32
  • [9] Impact of pathologic complete response on survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: a population-based analysis
    Nathalie LeVasseur
    J. Sun
    L. Gondara
    R. Diocee
    C. Speers
    C. Lohrisch
    S. Chia
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2020, 146 : 529 - 536
  • [10] Neoadjuvant Dual HER2-Targeted Therapy With Lapatinib and Trastuzumab Improves Pathologic Complete Response in Patients With Early Stage HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Prospective Clinical Trials
    Hicks, Mellissa
    Macrae, Erin R.
    Abdel-Rasoul, Mahmoud
    Layman, Rachel
    Friedman, Susan
    Querry, Jenny
    Lustberg, Maryam
    Ramaswamy, Bhuvaneswari
    Mrozek, Ewa
    Shapiro, Charles
    Wesolowski, Robert
    ONCOLOGIST, 2015, 20 (04) : 337 - 343