Differential effects of intellectual property rights on innovation and economic performance: A cross-industry investigation

被引：31

作者：

Cho, Kyungchul ^{[1
]}

Kim, Changseok ^{[2
]}

Shin, Juneseuk ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Korea Inst Patent Informat, Dept Management Support, Seoul 121816, South Korea

[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Syst Management Engn, Kyunggi Do 440746, South Korea

来源：

SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY | 2015年 / 42卷 / 06期

基金：

新加坡国家研究基金会;

关键词：

intellectual property rights; innovation; economic performance; semiconductor; pharmaceutical; shipbuilding; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; PATENT PROTECTION; GROWTH; FIRMS; DETERMINANTS; COMPETITION; INDICATORS; IMITATION; RETURNS; MODELS;

D O I：

10.1093/scipol/scv009

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

Despite many previous studies, the causal relationship among intellectual property rights (IPR) protection, innovation and economic growth remains ambiguous. Focusing on the differential effects of stronger IPR on industries, we suggest four causal paths from IPR through R&D to economic performance. Using firm-level panel data in semiconductor, pharmaceutical and shipbuilding industries in Korea, we find that effective causal paths vary not only by industry but by firm size. Stronger IPR are beneficial to R&D-intensive industries where large domestic firms have strong R&D and IPR capabilities, but have no impact on globalized industries. On the other hand, stronger IPR are detrimental to industries and to small and medium enterprises (SMEs) characterized by limited resources. Thus, to boost innovation and economic growth, IPR policies need to be customized to industries as well as SMEs. Universally strong IPR policies are likely to discourage innovation and growth, causing some industries to suffer.

引用

页码：827 / 840

页数：14

共 50 条

[41] Cross-industry innovation: A systematic literature review
Carmona-Lavado, Antonio
Gimenez-Fernandez, Elena M.
Vlaisavljevic, Vesna
Cabello-Medina, Carmen
TECHNOVATION, 2023, 124
[42] Intellectual property rights and appropriability of innovation
Akiyama, Taro
Furukawa, Yuichi
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2009, 103 (03) : 138 - 141
[43] Innovation and Management of Intellectual Property Rights of the Exhibition Industry in the Urban Economic Restructuring-Based on Survey of the Intellectual Property Situation of the Exhibition Enterprises in Shanghai
Xu Yan
Wu Dan
Wang Xuan
2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2012, : 1253 - 1258
[44] Innovation, imitation and Intellectual Property Rights: A note on Helpman's model
Mondal, D
Gupta, MR
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2006, 87 (01) : 29 - 53
[45] Intellectual property rights protection and technological innovation The moderating effect of internationalization
Cho, Se Ho
Kim, Hyun Gon
MULTINATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2017, 25 (04) : 350 - 368
[46] Innovation, Imitation and Intellectual Property Rights: A Note on Helpman's Model
Debasis Mondal
Manash Ranjan Gupta
Journal of Economics, 2006, 87 : 29 - 53
[47] Independent innovation and intellectual property rights
Li, Hua-Wei
Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering, 2006, : 196 - 200
[48] Intellectual Property Rights and the Ascent of Proprietary Innovation in Agriculture
Clancy, Matthew S.
Moschini, GianCarlo
ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 9, 2017, 9 : 53 - 74
[49] Does Litigation over the Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights Hinder Enterprise Innovation? An Empirical Analysis of the Taiwan IC Industry
Tsai, Bi-Huei
ISSUES & STUDIES, 2010, 46 (02): : 173 - 203
[50] Creative imitation: exploring the case of cross-industry innovation
Enkel, Ellen
Gassmann, Oliver
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2010, 40 (03) : 256 - 270

← 1 2 3 4 5 →