Mass media campaign improves cervical screening across all socio-economic groups

被引:37
作者
Anderson, Jenny O. [2 ]
Mullins, Robyn M. [1 ]
Siahpush, Mohammad [3 ]
Spittal, Matthew J. [1 ]
Wakefield, Melanie [1 ]
机构
[1] Canc Council Victoria, Ctr Behav Res Canc, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
[2] Crisis Support Serv, Footscray, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Promot Social & Behav Hlth, Omaha, NE USA
关键词
INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL; UNITED-STATES; CANCER; WOMEN; PREDICTORS; CARCINOMA; DIFFUSION; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1093/her/cyp023
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Low socio-economic status (SES) has been associated with lower cervical screening rates. Mass media is one known strategy that can increase cervical screening participation. This study sought to determine whether a mass media campaign conducted in Victoria, Australia, in 2005 was effective in encouraging women across all SES groups to screen. Data were obtained from the Victorian Cervical Cytology Registry for each Pap test registered during 2005 and categorized into SES quintiles using the Index of Socio-Economic Advantage/Disadvantage. Negative binomial regression was used to determine the impact of the campaign on the weekly number of Pap tests and whether the media campaign had a differential effect by SES, after adjusting for the number of workdays per week, age group and time since previous test. Cervical screening increased 27% during the campaign period and was equally effective in encouraging screening across all SES groups, including low-SES women. Mass media campaigns can prompt increased rates of cervical screening among all women, not just those from more advantaged areas. Combining media with additional strategies targeted at low-SES women may help lessen the underlying differences in screening rates across SES.
引用
收藏
页码:867 / 875
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Agresti A., 2018, An introduction to categorical data analysis
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2008, Tobacco Control Monograph
  • [3] *AUSTR I HLTH WELF, 2008, CERV SCREEN AUSTR 20
  • [4] Cervical cancer in Australia and the United Kingdom: comparison of screening policy and uptake, and cancer incidence and mortality
    Canfell, Karen
    Sitas, Freddy
    Beral, Valerie
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2006, 185 (09) : 482 - 486
  • [5] Cervical cancer screening among women in metropolitan areas of the United States by individual-level and area-based measures of socioeconomic status, 2000 to 2002
    Coughlin, Steven S.
    King, Jessica
    Richards, Thomas B.
    Ekwueme, Donatus U.
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2006, 15 (11) : 2154 - 2159
  • [6] Individual-, neighborhood-, and state-level socioeconomic predictors of cervical carcinoma screening among US black women - A multilevel analysis
    Datta, GD
    Colditz, GA
    Kawachi, I
    Subramanian, SV
    Palmer, JR
    Rosenberg, L
    [J]. CANCER, 2006, 106 (03) : 664 - 669
  • [7] KHAN M, 2006, CANCER, V104, P61
  • [8] Tobacco control policies and smoking in a population of low education women, 1992-2002
    Levy, David T.
    Mumford, Elizabeth A.
    Compton, Christine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2006, 60 : 20 - 26
  • [9] Socioeconomic status and cancers of the female breast and reproductive organs: a comparison across racial/ethnic populations in Los Angeles County, California (United States)
    Liu, LH
    Deapen, D
    Bernstein, L
    [J]. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 1998, 9 (04) : 369 - 380
  • [10] Inadequacy of cervical cancer screening among urban recent immigrants: A population-based study of physician and laboratory claims in Toronto, Canada
    Lofters, Aisha
    Glazier, Richard H.
    Agha, Mohammad M.
    Creatore, Maria I.
    Moineddin, Rahim
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2007, 44 (06) : 536 - 542