Prophylactic antibiotics after endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled noninferiority clinical trial

被引:18
作者
Lehmann, Ashton E. [1 ]
Raquib, Aaishah R. [2 ]
Siddiqi, Shan H. [3 ,4 ]
Meier, Josh [5 ,6 ]
Durand, Marlene L. [7 ]
Gray, Stacey T. [2 ,8 ]
Holbrook, Eric H. [2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Nashville, TN USA
[2] Massachusetts Eye & Ear, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Boston, MA USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Brain Circuit Therapeut, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Psychiat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Univ Nevada, Sch Med, Reno, NV 89557 USA
[6] Nevada ENT & Hearing Associates, Reno, NV USA
[7] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Infect Dis, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[8] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
chronic rhinosinusitis; endoscopic sinus surgery; evidence‐ based medicine; postoperative; quality of life; patient‐ reported outcome measure; SURGICAL SITE INFECTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; CARE; AMOXICILLIN; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1002/alr.22756
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background Surgeons commonly prescribe prophylactic antibiotics after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), yet minimal data exist to support this practice. In this study we aimed to assess the impact of post-ESS antibiotics on infection, quality of life (QOL), and endoscopic scores. Methods This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, noninferiority trial comparing amoxicillin-clavulanate vs placebo after ESS (NCT01919411, ClinicalTrials.gov). Adults (N = 77) with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) refractory to appropriate medical therapy who underwent ESS were randomized to antibiotics (N = 37) or placebo (N = 40) and followed clinically (mean +/- standard deviation: 1.3 +/- 0.3 and 8.8 +/- 3.9 weeks postoperatively). At baseline and follow-up, QOL was measured with 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test questionnaires and Lund-Kennedy endoscopic scores were evaluated. Outcomes were analyzed with repeated-measures analysis of variance and analysis of covariance and z tests for proportions. Results Placebo was noninferior to antibiotic prophylaxis with regard to postoperative SNOT-22 scores (beta = 0.18, 2-tailed p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the antibiotic and placebo groups in LK score trajectories over time (p = 0.63) or in postoperative infection rates (2.6% vs 2.4%, respectively; p = 0.96). The rate of diarrhea was significantly higher in the antibiotic group (24.3% vs 2.5%; relative risk = 10.8; p = 0.02). Conclusion Although statistically underpowered, the results suggest placebo was noninferior to prophylactic antibiotics after ESS for CRS regarding postoperative sinonasal-specific QOL. There were no significant differences in postoperative endoscopic scores or rates of infection, but the rate of diarrhea was significantly higher in the antibiotic group. These findings add to the growing evidence that routine use of prophylactic postoperative antibiotics does not improve outcomes post-ESS and significantly increases the rate of diarrhea.
引用
收藏
页码:1047 / 1055
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Prophylactic antibiotics in endoscopic sinus surgery: A short follow-up study [J].
Albu, Silviu ;
Lucaciu, Roxana .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2010, 24 (04) :306-309
[2]  
Annys E, 2000, Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg, V54, P23
[3]   Antibiotic-associated diarrhea [J].
Bartlett, JG .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (05) :334-339
[4]   Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017 [J].
Berrios, Sandra I. ;
Umscheid, Craig A. ;
Bratzler, Dale W. ;
Leas, Brian ;
Stone, Erin C. ;
Kelz, Rachel R. ;
Reinke, Caroline E. ;
Morgan, Sherry ;
Solomkin, Joseph S. ;
Mazuski, John E. ;
Dellinger, E. Patchen ;
Itani, Kamal M. F. ;
Berbari, Elie F. ;
Segreti, John ;
Parvizi, Javad ;
Blanchard, Joan ;
Allen, George ;
Kluytmans, Jan A. J. W. ;
Donlan, Rodney ;
Schecter, William P. .
JAMA SURGERY, 2017, 152 (08) :784-791
[5]   Ambulatory Sinus and Nasal Surgery in the United States: Demographics and Perioperative Outcomes [J].
Bhattacharyya, Neil .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2010, 120 (03) :635-638
[6]   Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgery [J].
Bratzler, Dale W. ;
Dellinger, E. Patchen ;
Olsen, Keith M. ;
Perl, Trish M. ;
Auwaerter, Paul G. ;
Bolon, Maureen K. ;
Fish, Douglas N. ;
Napolitano, Lena M. ;
Sawyer, Robert G. ;
Slain, Douglas ;
Steinberg, James P. ;
Weinstein, Robert A. .
SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2013, 14 (01) :73-156
[7]   A Survey and Analysis of the American Public's Perceptions and Knowledge About Antibiotic Resistance [J].
Carter, Rebecca R. ;
Sun, Jiayang ;
Jump, Robin L. P. .
OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2016, 3 (03)
[8]   The role of antibiotics in endoscopic sinus surgery [J].
Coughlan, Carolyn A. ;
Bhandarkar, Naveen .
CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2015, 23 (01) :47-52
[9]   Antibiotic use patterns in endoscopic sinus surgery: a survey of the American Rhinologic Society membership [J].
Fang, Christina H. ;
Fastenberg, Judd H. ;
Fried, Marvin P. ;
Jerschow, Elina ;
Akbar, Nadeem A. ;
Abuzeid, Waleed M. .
INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2018, 8 (04) :522-529
[10]   Common harms from amoxicillin: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials for any indication [J].
Gillies, Malcolm ;
Ranakusuma, Anggi ;
Hoffmann, Tammy ;
Thorning, Sarah ;
McGuire, Treasure ;
Glasziou, Paul ;
Del Mar, Christopher .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2015, 187 (01) :E21-E31