Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Colonic Mucosal Neoplasia and Evaluation of Long-Term Recurrence: A Single-Center Experience of 500 Cases

被引:1
作者
Ali, Saeed [1 ]
Khetpal, Neelam [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Idrisov, Evgeny [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Rahman, Asad Ur [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Khalid, Sameen [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Du, Yuan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Navaneethan, Udayakumar [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Varadarajulu, Shyam [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Hawes, Robert [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Hasan, Muhammad Khalid [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa Hlth Care, Dept Internal Med, 200 Hawkins Dr,SE 636 GH, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Hartford Healthcare, Dept Internal Med, Hartford, CT USA
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Oklahoma City, OK USA
[4] Cleveland Clin Florida, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Weston, FL USA
[5] Univ New Mexico, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[6] AdventHlth Orlando, AdventHlth Res Inst, Orlando, FL USA
[7] AdventHlth Orlando, Ctr Intervent Endoscopy, Orlando, FL USA
关键词
endoscopic mucosal resection; laterally spreading lesions; recurrence; SOCIETY TASK-FORCE; SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION; COLORECTAL-CANCER; COLONOSCOPIC POLYPECTOMY; ADENOMA RECURRENCE; SURGICAL MORTALITY; CONSENSUS UPDATE; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; ADVERSE EVENTS; FOLLOW-UP;
D O I
10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001234
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an alternative to surgery for the treatment of large laterally spreading lesions. Residual or recurrent adenoma is a major limitation. This study aimed to quantify early and late recurrences and to assess its associated risk factors. Methods The study was a single-center, multiendoscopist, longitudinal study conducted between January 1, 2013 and April 26, 2017. A total of 480 patients with 500 polyps who underwent an endoscopic resection were included. Surveillance colonoscopy (SC) was performed at 4 to 6 months (SC1) and 16 to 18 months (SC2). Results At SC1, early recurrence was noted in 77 of 354 (21.8%) lesions; 76 (98.7%) were treated endoscopically. The remaining 277 of 354 (78.2%) lesions had no recurrence at SC1; only 41 lesions (15%) were followed up at SC2. Recurrence at SC2 was found in 4 lesions (9.8%), all of which were treated endoscopically. Lesion size >40 mm was associated with recurrence. Recurrence at both SC1 and SC2 was successfully treated endoscopically in 78 of 81 lesions (96.3%). Conclusions EMR is an effective, minimally invasive technique for the treatment of large laterally spreading lesions. Although recurrence is a concern, its risk is low (21.8% on SC1 and 9.8% on SC2) and was managed endoscopically in 96.3% cases on follow-up endoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 206
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] The management of antithrombotic agents for patients undergoing GI endoscopy
    Acosta, Ruben D.
    Abraham, Neena S.
    Chandrasekhara, Vinay
    Chathadi, Krishnavel V.
    Early, Dayna S.
    Eloubeidi, Mohamad A.
    Evans, John A.
    Faulx, Ashley L.
    Fisher, Deborah A.
    Fonkalsrud, Lisa
    Hwang, Joo Ha
    Khashab, Mouen A.
    Lightdale, Jenifer R.
    Muthusamy, V. Raman
    Pasha, Shabana F.
    Saltzman, John R.
    Shaukat, Aasma
    Shergill, Amandeep K.
    Wang, Amy
    Cash, Brooks D.
    DeWitt, John M.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 83 (01) : 3 - 16
  • [2] Actual endoscopic versus predicted surgical mortality for treatment of advanced mucosal neoplasia of the colon
    Ahlenstiel, Golo
    Hourigan, Luke F.
    Brown, Gregor
    Zanati, Simon
    Williams, Stephen J.
    Singh, Rajvinder
    Moss, Alan
    Sonson, Rebecca
    Bourke, Michael J.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 80 (04) : 668 - 676
  • [3] EMR of large, sessile, sporadic nonampullary duodenal adenomas: technical aspects and long-term outcome (with videos)
    Alexander, Sina
    Bourke, Michael J.
    Williams, Stephen J.
    Bailey, Adam
    Co, Jonard
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (01) : 66 - 73
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2003, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V58, pS3
  • [5] How to justify endoscopic submucosal dissection in the Western world
    Bergman, J. J. G. H. M.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 41 (11) : 988 - 990
  • [6] Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States
    Birkmeyer, JD
    Stukel, TA
    Siewers, AE
    Goodney, PP
    Wennberg, DE
    Lucas, FL
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (22) : 2117 - 2127
  • [7] Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.
    Birkmeyer, JD
    Siewers, AE
    Finlayson, EVA
    Stukel, TA
    Lucas, FL
    Batista, I
    Welch, HG
    Wennberg, DE
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (15) : 1128 - 1137
  • [8] Endoscopic mucosal resection in the colon: A practical guide
    Bourke, Michael
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 13 (01) : 35 - 49
  • [9] CURRENT STATUS OF COLONIC ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION IN THE WEST AND THE INTERFACE WITH ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION
    Bourke, Michael
    [J]. DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 21 : S22 - S27
  • [10] Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Fujiya, Mikihiro
    Tanaka, Kazuyuki
    Dokoshi, Tatsuya
    Tominaga, Motoya
    Ueno, Nobuhiro
    Inaba, Yuhei
    Ito, Takahiro
    Moriichi, Kentaro
    Kohgo, Yutaka
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (03) : 583 - 595