Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Colonic Mucosal Neoplasia and Evaluation of Long-Term Recurrence: A Single-Center Experience of 500 Cases

被引:1
|
作者
Ali, Saeed [1 ]
Khetpal, Neelam [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Idrisov, Evgeny [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Rahman, Asad Ur [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Khalid, Sameen [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Du, Yuan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Navaneethan, Udayakumar [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Varadarajulu, Shyam [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Hawes, Robert [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Hasan, Muhammad Khalid [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa Hlth Care, Dept Internal Med, 200 Hawkins Dr,SE 636 GH, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Hartford Healthcare, Dept Internal Med, Hartford, CT USA
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Oklahoma City, OK USA
[4] Cleveland Clin Florida, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Weston, FL USA
[5] Univ New Mexico, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[6] AdventHlth Orlando, AdventHlth Res Inst, Orlando, FL USA
[7] AdventHlth Orlando, Ctr Intervent Endoscopy, Orlando, FL USA
关键词
endoscopic mucosal resection; laterally spreading lesions; recurrence; SOCIETY TASK-FORCE; SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION; COLORECTAL-CANCER; COLONOSCOPIC POLYPECTOMY; ADENOMA RECURRENCE; SURGICAL MORTALITY; CONSENSUS UPDATE; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; ADVERSE EVENTS; FOLLOW-UP;
D O I
10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001234
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an alternative to surgery for the treatment of large laterally spreading lesions. Residual or recurrent adenoma is a major limitation. This study aimed to quantify early and late recurrences and to assess its associated risk factors. Methods The study was a single-center, multiendoscopist, longitudinal study conducted between January 1, 2013 and April 26, 2017. A total of 480 patients with 500 polyps who underwent an endoscopic resection were included. Surveillance colonoscopy (SC) was performed at 4 to 6 months (SC1) and 16 to 18 months (SC2). Results At SC1, early recurrence was noted in 77 of 354 (21.8%) lesions; 76 (98.7%) were treated endoscopically. The remaining 277 of 354 (78.2%) lesions had no recurrence at SC1; only 41 lesions (15%) were followed up at SC2. Recurrence at SC2 was found in 4 lesions (9.8%), all of which were treated endoscopically. Lesion size >40 mm was associated with recurrence. Recurrence at both SC1 and SC2 was successfully treated endoscopically in 78 of 81 lesions (96.3%). Conclusions EMR is an effective, minimally invasive technique for the treatment of large laterally spreading lesions. Although recurrence is a concern, its risk is low (21.8% on SC1 and 9.8% on SC2) and was managed endoscopically in 96.3% cases on follow-up endoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 206
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and Safety of Duodenal Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: A Single-Center Experience
    Chaar, Abdelkader
    Frandah, Wesam
    Asad-Ur-Rahman, F. N. U.
    Siddique, Sameer
    Hawes, Robert
    Navaneethan, Udayakumar
    Varadarajulu, Shyam
    Hebert-Magee, Shantel
    Hasan, Muhammad
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 111 : S170 - S170
  • [2] Local recurrence of colorectal neoplasia after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): Long-term follow-up evaluation
    Teixeira, CR
    Tonelotto, EB
    Lima, JCP
    Coelho, NV
    Torresini, RS
    Saul, C
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 57 (05) : AB87 - AB87
  • [3] Evaluation of Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: Single Operator Experience At a Single Tertiary Centre
    Kopacova, Marcela
    Tycova, Vera
    Podhola, Miroslav
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (05) : AB193 - AB193
  • [4] Esophageal endoscopic mucosal resection for early neoplasia: Four-year, single-center experience in 79 patients
    Cho, Sarah
    Kandel, Gabor
    Kortan, Paul
    May, Gary
    Marcon, Norman
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 65 (05) : AB141 - AB141
  • [5] Endoscopic mucosal resection for large and giant sessile and flat colorectal polyps: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up
    Luigiano, C.
    Consolo, P.
    Scaffidi, M. G.
    Strangio, G.
    Giacobbe, G.
    Alibrandi, A.
    Pallio, S.
    Tortora, A.
    Melita, G.
    Familiari, L.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 41 (10) : 829 - 835
  • [6] Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) for Esophageal Lesions: A Single-Center Experience
    Rahman, Fnu Asad Ur
    Chaar, Abdelkader
    Siddique, Sameer
    Frandah, Wesam
    Hawes, Robert
    Navaneethan, Udayakumar
    Varadarajulu, Shyam
    Hebert-Magee, Shantel
    Hasan, Muhammad
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 111 : S1245 - S1246
  • [7] Duodenal Endoscopic Mucosal Resection : A Single, Experimented Center Experience
    Leblanc, Sarah
    Barbieri, Julie
    Gaudric, Marianne
    Chaussade, Stanislas
    Prat, Frederic
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 136 (05) : A732 - A732
  • [8] PREDICTION OF SUBMUCOSAL INVASION OF ADVANCED COLONIC MUCOSAL NEOPLASIA REFERRED FOR ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION
    Neelam, Khetpal
    Ali, Saeed
    Idrisov, Evgeny A.
    Hasan, Muhammad K.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (06) : AB476 - AB476
  • [9] Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study
    Moss, Alan
    Williams, Stephen J.
    Hourigan, Luke F.
    Brown, Gregor
    Tam, William
    Singh, Rajvinder
    Zanati, Simon
    Burgess, Nicholas G.
    Sonson, Rebecca
    Byth, Karen
    Bourke, Michael J.
    GUT, 2015, 64 (01) : 57 - 65
  • [10] Duodenal Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: A Single, Prospective, Experimented Center Experience
    Leblanc, Sarah
    Chaput, Ulriikka
    Gaudric, Marianne
    Coriat, Romain
    Chaussade, Stanislas
    Prat, Frederic
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (05) : AB368 - AB368