Group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations based on modified extent measurement

被引:35
作者
Ren, Peijia [1 ]
Xu, Zeshui [2 ]
Wang, Xinxin [2 ]
Zeng, Xiao-Jun [3 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, Sch Business Adm, Guangzhou 510640, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Manchester, Sch Comp Sci, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
Group decision making; Hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relation; Clustering algorithm; Consensus index; Modified extent;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114235
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The paper presents a consensus model for group decision making (GDM) with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations (HFLPRs), which is composed of two parts: (1) clustering HFLPRs by mapping them into a higher dimension space based on a kernel function; (2) building a consensus model based on measuring the modified extents of decision makers? HFLPRs for reducing the biased judgements existing in their less-familiar ways. The paper further makes comprehensive analyses for the proposed model on: (1) the influence of decision makers? different sensitive attitudes towards the distances between the individual HFLPRs and the overall HFLPRs on decision-making results; (2) the differences and complexities of another model with a different consensus perspective and the proposed model. The experimental analyses provide the support for the maximum modified extent determination in different decision scenarios, and show that the proposed consensus model makes sense. Finally, the proposed model is illustrated by the application in choosing an optimal flood discharge technique for a hydropower station.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Altan A, 2019, J COGNITIVE SYSTEMS, V4, P17, DOI DOI 10.1186/S41235-019-0167-2
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1981, PATTERN RECOGNITION
[3]   Multi-criteria group consensus under linear cost opinion elasticity [J].
Ben-Arieh, D. ;
Easton, T. .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2007, 43 (03) :713-721
[4]   A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators [J].
Bordogna, G ;
Fedrizzi, M ;
Pasi, G .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 1997, 27 (01) :126-132
[5]   A bipolar consensus approach for group decision making problems [J].
Bouzarour-Amokrane, Yasmina ;
Tchangani, Ayeley ;
Peres, Francois .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2015, 42 (03) :1759-1772
[6]   Large-scale group decision-making with non-cooperative behaviors and heterogeneous preferences: An application in financial inclusion [J].
Chao, Xiangrui ;
Kou, Gang ;
Peng, Yi ;
Viedma, Enrique Herrera .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 288 (01) :271-293
[7]   Controlling the worst consistency index for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations in consensus optimization models [J].
Chen, Xue ;
Peng, Lijie ;
Wu, Zhibin ;
Pedrycz, Witold .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 143
[8]   Reaching a minimum adjustment consensus in social network group decision-making [J].
Cheng, Dong ;
Cheng, Faxin ;
Zhou, Zhili ;
Wu, Yong .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2020, 59 :30-43
[9]   A new kernel-based fuzzy clustering approach: Support vector clustering with cell growing [J].
Chiang, JH ;
Hao, PY .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2003, 11 (04) :518-527
[10]   OVERCOMING RESISTANCE TO CHANGE [J].
Coch, Lester ;
French, John R. P., Jr. .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 1948, 1 (04) :512-532