Prognostic Heterogeneity of Endosonographic T3 Rectal Cancer

被引:10
作者
Esclapez, Pedro [1 ]
Garcia-Granero, Eduardo [1 ]
Flor, Blas [1 ]
Garcia-Botello, Stephanie [1 ]
Cervantes, Andres [2 ]
Navarro, Samuel [3 ]
Lledo, Salvador [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Coloproctol Unit, Multidisciplinary Rectal Canc Team, Hosp Clin, Valencia, Spain
[2] Univ Valencia, Dept Oncol, Multidisciplinary Rectal Canc Team, Hosp Clin, Valencia, Spain
[3] Univ Valencia, Dept Pathol, Multidisciplinary Rectal Canc Team, Hosp Clin, Valencia, Spain
关键词
T3; Preoperative staging; Rectal cancer; Endorectal ultrasonography; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; ENDORECTAL ULTRASOUND; RESECTION MARGIN; PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT; LOCAL RECURRENCE; TUMOR INVASION; INVOLVEMENT; CARCINOMA; SURGERY; EXTENT;
D O I
10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819ed03d
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the prognostic implications of uT3 rectal carcinomas according to the tumor thickness and to analyze the correlation between this ultrasound-based parameter and other prognostic factors. METHODS: Seventy-four patients with uT3(pM0) rectal tumors underwent primary surgery from 1996 to 2003. Preoperative endorectal ultrasound was used to assess uN stage, maximum tumor perimeter, and maximum tumor thickness. An ultrasound maximum tumor thickness cutoff point for local recurrence subdividing T3 tumors into uT3a and uT3b was established. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 41 months (range, 24-59). The 5-year actuarial local and overall recurrence rates were 9.82 percent (n = 7) and 42.46 percent (n = 23), respectively. uN stage(P = 0.05), circumferential resection margin involvement (P = 0.002), an ultrasound maximum tumor thickness (P = 0.01), and locally advanced tumors (P = 0.001) were related to a significantly increased risk of local recurrence. An ultrasound maximum tumor thickness (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.0-1.2) and locally advanced tumor (hazard ratio, 17.21; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.99-98.84) were preoperative independent variables for predicting local recurrence. Locally advanced tumor was the only preoperative independent prognostic factor for overall recurrence (P = 0.004; hazard ratio, 1.09; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.0-1.1). An ultrasound maximum tumor thickness with a 19-mm cutoff point, subdividing the T3 tumors into uT3a and uT3b, can be used to predict local recurrence. Locally advanced tumors (P = 0.02) and circumferential resection margin involvement (P = 0.005) showed a significant association with an ultrasound maximum tumor thickness >19mm. CONCLUSIONS: A maximum tumor thickness measured by endorectal ultrasound in pT3 rectal cancer is an independent prognostic factor for local and overall recurrence. An ultrasound maximum tumor thickness cutoff point of 19 mm may be useful to classify patients preoperatively and to select them for primary surgery or neoadjuvant therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 691
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF MESORECTAL LYMPH-NODE INVOLVEMENT IN RECTAL-CANCER
    BEYNON, J
    MORTENSEN, NJM
    FOY, DMA
    CHANNER, JL
    RIGBY, H
    VIRJEE, J
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1989, 76 (03) : 276 - 279
  • [2] Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery
    Birbeck, KF
    Macklin, CP
    Tiffin, NJ
    Parsons, W
    Dixon, MF
    Mapstone, NP
    Abbott, CR
    Scott, N
    Finan, PJ
    Johnston, D
    Quirke, P
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 235 (04) : 449 - 457
  • [3] Thin section MRI in multidisciplinary pre-operative decision making for patients with rectal cancer
    Brown, G
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 78 : S117 - S127
  • [4] Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging
    Brown, G
    Radcliffe, AG
    Newcombe, RG
    Dallimore, NS
    Bourne, MW
    Williams, GT
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (03) : 355 - 364
  • [5] Rectal carcinoma: Thin-section MR imaging for staging in 28 patients
    Brown, G
    Richards, CJ
    Newcombe, RG
    Dallimore, NS
    Radcliffe, AG
    Carey, DP
    Bourne, MW
    Williams, GT
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1999, 211 (01) : 215 - 222
  • [6] EXTENT OF MESORECTAL SPREAD AND INVOLVEMENT OF LATERAL RESECTION MARGIN AS PROGNOSTIC FACTORS AFTER SURGERY FOR RECTAL-CANCER
    CAWTHORN, SJ
    PARUMS, DV
    GIBBS, NM
    AHERN, RP
    CAFFAREY, SM
    BROUGHTON, CIM
    MARKS, CG
    [J]. LANCET, 1990, 335 (8697) : 1055 - 1059
  • [7] Prognostic groups in 1,676 patients with T3 rectal cancer treated without preoperative radiotherapy
    Eriksen, Morten T.
    Wibe, Arne
    Haffner, Jon
    Wiig, Johan N.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (02) : 156 - 164
  • [8] Accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in preoperative staging of rectal tumors
    Garcia-Aguilar, J
    Pollack, J
    Lee, SH
    de Anda, EH
    Mellgren, A
    Wong, WD
    Finne, CO
    Rothenberger, DA
    Madoff, RD
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2002, 45 (01) : 10 - 15
  • [9] Garcia-Granero E, 2001, Colorectal Dis, V3, P179, DOI 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2001.00223.x
  • [10] Goh V, 2004, CLIN RADIOL, V59, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.crad.2003.08.013