Evaluating quality of life outcomes following joint replacement: psychometric evaluation of a short form of the WHOQOL-Bref

被引:32
|
作者
Snell, Deborah L. [1 ]
Siegert, Richard J. [3 ]
Surgenor, Lois J. [2 ]
Dunn, Jennifer A. [1 ]
Hooper, Gary J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Musculoskeletal Med, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] Univ Otago, Dept Psychol Med, Christchurch, New Zealand
[3] AUT Univ Auckland, Sch Rehabil & Occupat Studies, Sch Publ Hlth & Psychosocial Studies, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
Quality of life; EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index; Total joint replacement; WHOQOL-Bref; QOL 8-ITEM INDEX; TOTAL HIP; KNEE REPLACEMENT; OXFORD HIP; HEALTH; ARTHROPLASTY; OSTEOARTHRITIS;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-015-1044-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Reducing participant burden is important in health research and clinical assessment. We examined the psychometric properties of the EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index, a short version of the 26-item World Health Organisation Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-Bref), in a sample of people receiving joint replacement surgery. Participants (n = 1008) completed the WHOQOL-Bref at either 6, 12, 24 or 60 months after hip or knee replacement. The factor structure, differential item functioning (DIF) and unidimensionality of the EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index were examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and Rasch analyses. Convergent validity was examined using correlations with the parent measure and other patient-reported outcome measures (Oxford scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index). Discriminant validity was assessed between groups reporting high versus low pain and function, and by joint replaced. The measure demonstrated high internal consistency (alpha = 0.86), adequate convergent (r = 0.47-0.82, p < 0.001) and discriminant validity (p < 0.001). Factor and Rasch analyses supported a unidimensional structure. However, there were also indications of multidimensionality, with support for a two-factor model focusing on general health and function, and psychosocial aspects of QOL. There was minimal evidence of DIF, with just one item evaluating energy level showing DIF for age. The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index demonstrated adequate properties as a unidimensional scale and as a two-factor scale evaluating general health and function, and psychosocial aspects of quality of life. It is low on clinical and participant burden, showed minimal ceiling effects and showed good concurrent and discriminant validity.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 61
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life instrument (WHOQoL-BREF) in alcoholic males: A pilot study
    Lima, AFBD
    Fleck, M
    Pechansky, F
    de Boni, R
    Sukop, P
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2005, 14 (02) : 473 - 478
  • [32] Toward an understanding of the quality of life construct: Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-Bref in a psychiatric sample
    Oliveira, Sandra E. H.
    Carvalho, Helena
    Esteves, Francisco
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2016, 244 : 37 - 44
  • [33] Evaluation of quality of life in hemophilia patients using the WHOQOL-bref and Haemo-A-Qol questionnaires
    Trindade, Gustavo Cambraia
    Viggiano, Luiza Gabrielle de Lacerda
    Brant, Enderson Resende
    Lopes, Carlos Alexandre de Oliveira
    Faria, Mateus Lopes de
    Ribeiro, Pedro Henrique Nery de Sit
    Silva, Ana Flitvia do Carmo
    Souza, Diana Maria de Resende
    Lopes, Aline de Freitas
    Soares, Joao Marcos Arantes
    Pinheiro, Melina de Barros
    HEMATOLOGY TRANSFUSION AND CELL THERAPY, 2019, 41 (04) : 335 - 341
  • [34] Measuring quality of life in ALS/MND: validation of the WHOQOL-BREF
    Young, Carolyn A.
    Mills, Roger
    Al-Chalabi, Ammar
    Burke, Georgina
    Chandran, Siddharthan
    Dick, David J.
    Ealing, John
    Hanemann, C. Oliver
    Harrower, Timothy
    Mcdermott, Christopher J.
    Majeed, Tahir
    Pinto, Ashwin
    Talbot, Kevin
    Walsh, Jannette
    Williams, Timothy L.
    Tennant, Alan
    Ellis, C. M.
    Hamdalla, Hisham
    Johnston, Clare
    Orrell, Richard W.
    Roberts, Rhys C.
    AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS AND FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION, 2020, 21 (5-6) : 364 - 372
  • [35] Translation of the WHO quality of life scale: the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire
    Congost-Maestre, Nereida
    JOURNAL OF SPECIALISED TRANSLATION, 2018, (30) : 312 - 334
  • [36] Quality of life of adults with spinal cord injury: a study using the WHOQOL-bref
    Xavier de Franca, Inacia Satiro
    Coura, Alexsandro Silva
    de Franca, Euripedes Gil
    Vieira Basilio, Narjara Neumann
    Souto, Rafaela Queiroga
    REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, 2011, 45 (06) : 1361 - 1368
  • [37] Possible error in the Danish version of the WHO Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) Questionnaire
    Thomsen, Ane Sondergaard
    Bech, Per
    NORDIC JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 71 (07) : 549 - 550
  • [38] Assessment of the Quality of Life Among Prison Employees in Kosovo: A WHOQOL-BREF Analysis
    Gjocaj, Milazim
    Shuleta-Qehaja, Selvete
    Kelmendi, Nita
    Krasniqi, Blerim
    Ukelli, Shqipe
    Rexhaj, Astrit
    Salihaj, Nora
    Novoberdaliu, Shukrane
    Idrizaj, Arian
    Shahini, Labinot
    Kabashi, Klodeta
    Kosumi, Shera
    Dobroshi, Krenar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICINE, 2024, 14 (04) : 679 - 685
  • [39] Psychometric Evaluation of the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) for Patients With Schizophrenia
    Su, Chia-Ting
    Ng, Hong-Son
    Yang, Ai-Lun
    Lin, Chung-Ying
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2014, 26 (03) : 980 - 989
  • [40] A Quality of Life Study in Patients with Leprosy Using DLQI and WHOQOL-BREF Questionnaires
    Tare, Dakshata A.
    Viswanath, Vishalakshi
    Pai, Kalpita S.
    Samel, Dinesh R.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 66 (05) : 574