Evaluating quality of life outcomes following joint replacement: psychometric evaluation of a short form of the WHOQOL-Bref

被引:32
|
作者
Snell, Deborah L. [1 ]
Siegert, Richard J. [3 ]
Surgenor, Lois J. [2 ]
Dunn, Jennifer A. [1 ]
Hooper, Gary J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Musculoskeletal Med, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] Univ Otago, Dept Psychol Med, Christchurch, New Zealand
[3] AUT Univ Auckland, Sch Rehabil & Occupat Studies, Sch Publ Hlth & Psychosocial Studies, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
Quality of life; EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index; Total joint replacement; WHOQOL-Bref; QOL 8-ITEM INDEX; TOTAL HIP; KNEE REPLACEMENT; OXFORD HIP; HEALTH; ARTHROPLASTY; OSTEOARTHRITIS;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-015-1044-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Reducing participant burden is important in health research and clinical assessment. We examined the psychometric properties of the EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index, a short version of the 26-item World Health Organisation Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-Bref), in a sample of people receiving joint replacement surgery. Participants (n = 1008) completed the WHOQOL-Bref at either 6, 12, 24 or 60 months after hip or knee replacement. The factor structure, differential item functioning (DIF) and unidimensionality of the EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index were examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and Rasch analyses. Convergent validity was examined using correlations with the parent measure and other patient-reported outcome measures (Oxford scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index). Discriminant validity was assessed between groups reporting high versus low pain and function, and by joint replaced. The measure demonstrated high internal consistency (alpha = 0.86), adequate convergent (r = 0.47-0.82, p < 0.001) and discriminant validity (p < 0.001). Factor and Rasch analyses supported a unidimensional structure. However, there were also indications of multidimensionality, with support for a two-factor model focusing on general health and function, and psychosocial aspects of QOL. There was minimal evidence of DIF, with just one item evaluating energy level showing DIF for age. The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index demonstrated adequate properties as a unidimensional scale and as a two-factor scale evaluating general health and function, and psychosocial aspects of quality of life. It is low on clinical and participant burden, showed minimal ceiling effects and showed good concurrent and discriminant validity.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 61
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Psychometric Properties of the World Health Organization's Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) Questionnaire in Medical Students
    Ilic, Irena
    Sipetic-Grujicic, Sandra
    Grujicic, Jovan
    Macuzic, Ivana Zivanovic
    Kocic, Sanja
    Ilic, Milena
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2019, 55 (12):
  • [22] A comparison of the WHOQOL-100 and the WHOQOL-BREF in detecting change in quality of life following liver transplantation
    R.E. O'Carroll
    K. Smith
    M. Couston
    J.A. Cossar
    P.C. Hayes
    Quality of Life Research, 2000, 9 : 121 - 124
  • [23] Assessment of quality of life using WHOQOL-BREF in patients with visceral leishmaniasis
    Rajendra Babu Veeri
    Ashok Kumar Gupta
    Biplab Pal
    Niyamat Ali Siddiqui
    Devi Priya
    Pradeep Das
    Krishna Pandey
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 17
  • [24] Assessment of quality of life using WHOQOL-BREF in patients with visceral leishmaniasis
    Veeri, Rajendra Babu
    Gupta, Ashok Kumar
    Pal, Biplab
    Siddiqui, Niyamat Ali
    Priya, Devi
    Das, Pradeep
    Pandey, Krishna
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2019, 17 (1)
  • [25] A comparison of the WHOQOL-100 and the WHOQOL-BREF in detecting change in quality of life following liver transplantation
    O'Carroll, RE
    Smith, K
    Couston, M
    Cossar, JA
    Hayes, PC
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2000, 9 (01) : 121 - 124
  • [26] Development of the korean versions of WHO quality of life scale and WHOQOL-BREF
    Min, SK
    Kim, KI
    Lee, CI
    Jung, YC
    Suh, SY
    Kim, DK
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2002, 11 (06) : 593 - 600
  • [27] Development of the Korean versions of WHO Quality of Life scale and WHOQOL-BREF
    S.K. Min
    K.I. Kim
    C.I. Lee
    Y.C. Jung
    S.Y. Suh
    D.K. Kim
    Quality of Life Research, 2002, 11 : 593 - 600
  • [28] Adaptation and Validation of the World Health Organization Quality of Life - BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) for People with Aphasia
    Araujo, Ana Filipa S.
    Jesus, Luis M. T.
    Sa-Couto, Pedro
    Matos, Maria Assuncao C.
    APHASIOLOGY, 2024, 38 (08) : 1331 - 1350
  • [29] Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life instrument (WHOQoL-BREF) in alcoholic males: A pilot study
    Barros Da Silva Lima A.F.
    Fleck M.
    Pechansky F.
    De Boni R.
    Sukop P.
    Quality of Life Research, 2005, 14 (2) : 473 - 478
  • [30] Adequacy of the WHOQoL-BREF to Assess the Quality of Life of Victims of Armed Conflicts
    Morales-Valiente, Claudia
    Mok, Liu
    Wong, Alina
    Manzanero, Antonio L.
    Guarch-Rubio, Marta
    Simancas, Marlen
    Celedon-Rivero, Jose C.
    Salas-Picon, Wilson M.
    ASSESSMENT, 2024, 31 (05) : 1135 - 1147