Multicentre evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging supported transperineal prostate biopsy in biopsy-naive men with suspicion of prostate cancer

被引:115
作者
Hansen, Nienke L. [1 ,13 ]
Barrett, Tristan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kesch, Claudia [4 ]
Pepdjonovic, Lana [5 ,6 ]
Bonekamp, David [7 ]
O'Sullivan, Richard [8 ,9 ]
Distler, Florian [4 ]
Warren, Anne [1 ,3 ,10 ]
Samel, Christina [11 ]
Hadaschik, Boris [4 ,14 ]
Grummet, Jeremy [5 ,6 ]
Kastner, Christof [1 ,3 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Addenbrookes Hosp, CamPARI Clin, Cambridge, England
[2] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Radiol, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Hosp Heidelberg, Dept Urol, Heidelberg, Germany
[5] Australian Urol Associates, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Monash Univ, Dept Surg, Cent Clin Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] German Canc Res Ctr, Dept Radiol, Heidelberg, Germany
[8] Healthcare Imaging, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[9] Monash Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[10] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Pathol, Cambridge, England
[11] Univ Hosp Cologne, Inst Med Stat Informat & Epidemiol, Cologne, Germany
[12] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Urol, Cambridge, England
[13] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Cologne, Germany
[14] Univ Hosp Essen, Dept Urol, Essen, Germany
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
transperineal; magnetic resonance imaging; MRI-TRUS fusion; cognitive fusion; prostate biopsy; #PCSM; #ProstateCancer; ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BIOPSY; TARGETED BIOPSY; REPEAT BIOPSY; FUSION; MRI; GUIDELINES; DIAGNOSIS; RISK; HISTOPATHOLOGY; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1111/bju.14049
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo analyse the detection rates of primary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-fusion transperineal prostate biopsy using combined targeted and systematic core distribution in three tertiary referral centres. Patients and MethodsIn this multicentre, prospective outcome study, 807 consecutive biopsy-naive patients underwent MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy, as the first diagnostic intervention, between 10/2012 and 05/2016. MRI was reported following the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) criteria. In all, 236 patients had 18-24 systematic transperineal biopsies only, and 571 patients underwent additional targeted biopsies either by MRI-fusion or cognitive targeting if PI-RADS 3 lesions were present. Detection rates for any and Gleason score 7-10 cancer in targeted and overall biopsy were calculated and predictive values were calculated for different PI-RADS and PSA density (PSAD) groups. ResultsCancer was detected in 68% of the patients (546/807) and Gleason score 7-10 cancer in 49% (392/807). The negative predictive value of 236 PI-RADS 1-2 MRI in combination with PSAD of <0.1ng/mL/mL for Gleason score 7-10 was 0.91 (95% confidence interval 0.07, 8% of study population). In 418 patients with PI-RADS 4-5 lesions using targeted plus systematic biopsies, the cancer detection rate of Gleason score 7-10 was significantly higher at 71% vs 59% and 61% with either approach alone (P < 0.001). For 153 PI-RADS 3 lesions, the detection rate was 31% with no significant difference to systematic biopsies with 27% (P > 0.05). Limitations include variability of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) reading and Gleason grading. ConclusionMRI-based transperineal biopsy performed at high-volume tertiary care centres with a significant experience of prostate mpMRI and image-guided targeted biopsies yielded high detection rates of Gleason score 7-10 cancer. Prostate biopsies may not be needed for men with low PSAD and an unsuspicious MRI. In patients with high probability lesions, combined targeted and systematic biopsies are recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 49
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Use of Prostate Systematic and Targeted Biopsy on the Basis of Bi-Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Biopsy-Naive Patients
    Cheng, Yifei
    Qi, Feng
    Liang, Linghui
    Zhang, Lei
    Cao, Dongliang
    Hua, Lixin
    Cheng, Gong
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (01) : 92 - 97
  • [22] An update on prostate biopsy in the era of magnetic resonance imaging
    Cicione, Antonio
    De Nunzio, Cosimo
    Manno, Stefano
    Damiano, Rocco
    Posti, Alessandro
    Lima, Estevao
    Tubaro, Andrea
    Balloni, Filippo
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2018, 70 (03) : 264 - 274
  • [23] Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men The Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer (BIDOC) Study
    Boesen, Lars
    Norgaard, Nis
    Logager, Vibeke
    Balslev, Ingegerd
    Bisbjerg, Rasmus
    Thestrup, Karen-Cecilie
    Winther, Mads D.
    Jakobsen, Henrik
    Thomsen, Henrik S.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2018, 1 (02)
  • [24] Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy With Systematic Transrectal Ultrasonography Biopsy for Biopsy-Naive Men at Risk for Prostate Cancer A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial
    Klotz, Laurence
    Chin, Joseph
    Black, Peter C.
    Finelli, Antonio
    Anidjar, Maurice
    Bladou, Franck
    Machado, Ashley
    Levental, Mark
    Ghai, Sangeet
    Chang, Sylvia
    Milot, Laurent
    Patel, Chirag
    Kassam, Zahra
    Moore, Carolyn
    Kasivisanathan, Veeru
    Loblaw, Andrew
    Kebabdjian, Marlene
    Earle, Craig C.
    Pond, Greg R.
    Haider, Masoom A.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2021, 7 (04) : 534 - 542
  • [25] Magnetic Resonance and Ultrasound Image Fusion Supported Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Using the Ginsburg Protocol: Technique, Learning Points, and Biopsy Results
    Hansen, Nienke
    Patruno, Giulio
    Wadhwa, Karan
    Gaziev, Gabriele
    Miano, Roberto
    Barrett, Tristan
    Gnanapragasam, Vincent
    Doble, Andrew
    Warren, Anne
    Bratt, Ola
    Kastner, Christof
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 70 (02) : 332 - 340
  • [26] Impact of biparametric prebiopsy prostate magnetic resonance imaging on the diagnostics of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy naive men
    Knaapila, Juha
    Autio, Venla
    Jambor, Ivan
    Ettala, Otto
    Verho, Janne
    Kiyiniemi, Aida
    Taimen, Pekka
    Perez, Ileana Montoya
    Aronen, Hannu J.
    Syvanen, Kari T.
    Bostrom, Peter J.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 54 (01) : 7 - 13
  • [27] The accuracy of prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy-naive patients using combined magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy
    Uno, Hiromi
    Taniguchi, Tomoki
    Seike, Kensaku
    Kato, Daiki
    Takai, Manabu
    Iinuma, Koji
    Horie, Kengo
    Nakane, Keita
    Koie, Takuya
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2021, 10 (07) : 2982 - 2989
  • [28] The role of prostate-specific antigen density and negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in excluding prostate cancer for biopsy-naive men: clinical outcomes from a high-volume center in China
    Zhang, Chi-Chen
    Tu, Xiang
    Lin, Tian-Hai
    Cai, Di-Ming
    Yang, Ling
    Nie, Ling
    Qiu, Shi
    Liu, Zhen-Hua
    Jin, Kun
    Li, Jia-Kun
    Xiong, Xing-Yu
    Yang, Lu
    Wei, Qiang
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2022, 24 (06) : 615 - 619
  • [29] Transperineal prostate biopsy: The modern gold standard to prostate cancer diagnosis
    Ortner, Gernot
    Tzanaki, Eirini
    Rai, Bhavan Prasad
    Nagele, Udo
    Tokas, Theodoros
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 47 : S19 - S26
  • [30] Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naive Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy
    Mannaerts, Christophe K.
    Gayet, Maudy
    Verbeek, Jan F.
    Engelbrecht, Marc R. W.
    Savci-Heijink, C. Dilara
    Jager, Gerrit J.
    Gielens, Maaike P. M.
    van der Linden, Hans
    Beerlage, Harrie P.
    de Reijke, Theo M.
    Wijkstra, Hessel
    Roobol, Monique J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2018, 1 (02): : 109 - 117