Descartes' demon - A dialogical analysis of meditations on first philosophy

被引:14
作者
Gillespie, Alex [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stirling, Dept Psychol, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
关键词
Bakhtin; Descartes; dialogicality; intersubjectivity; Mead; solipsism;
D O I
10.1177/0959354306070527
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Descartes argued that the existence of reflective thought should be the first principle of philosophy because it is indubitable. The present paper draws on Bakhtinian and Meadian theories to analyse the three key paragraphs in the Meditations in which Descartes argues this point. The analysis demonstrates: (1) that Descartes' text contains the traces of significant others and the discourses of his time; (2) that the sequence of thoughts that leads Descartes to his first principle is fundamentally dialogical; (3) that Descartes' self-awareness, which he takes as primary, depends upon his reflecting upon himself from the perspective of a more or less generalized other; and finally (4) that Descartes takes the perspective of the other by reversing his own reactions towards others, such that he reacts to himself in the same way that he previously reacted to others. This re-analysis challenges Cartesian solipsism, arguing that the mind, or self-reflection, is fundamentally social.
引用
收藏
页码:761 / 781
页数:21
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1984, PHILOS WRITINGS DESC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Cartesian Meditations
[3]  
[Anonymous], MODERNITY HEGEMONY V
[4]  
Ariew Roger., 1992, CAMBRIDGE COMPANION
[5]  
Baker GordonKatherine J. Morris., 1996, Descartes' Dualism
[6]  
Bakhtin MM., 1987, SPEECH GENRES OTHER, V2nd
[7]   From 'the thought is the thinker' to 'the voice is the speaker' - William James and the dialogical self [J].
Barresi, J .
THEORY & PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 12 (02) :237-250
[8]  
BKAHTIN M, 1981, DIALOGIC IMAGINATION
[9]  
Brentano F., 1995, PSYCHOL EMPIRICAL ST
[10]  
Burke Peter., 2000, A Social History of Knowledge: From Gutenberg to Diderot