No difference in biochemical failure rates with or without pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in low-risk patients

被引:30
作者
Fergany, A
Kupelian, PA
Levin, HS
Zippe, CD
Reddy, C
Klein, EA
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Urol, Sect Urol Oncol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Radiat Oncol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Anat Pathol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00550-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To detect the short-term differences in biochemical relapse-free rates between patients with and without pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Recently, a trend has begun to omit PLND in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy considered at low risk of pelvic lymph node metastases, Methods. The records of 1152 consecutive radical prostatectomy cases were reviewed. A total of 575 patients with favorable tumor characteristics (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] 10 ng/mL or less, Gleason score 6 or less, and clinical Stage T1 or T2) who were not receiving adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy were divided into two groups according to whether PLND was performed (PLND group, n = 372) or omitted (no PLND group, n = 203). Proportional hazards were used to analyze the effect of age, race, family history, stage, biopsy Gleason score, initial PSA, PLND, and pathologic findings on the likelihood of biochemical failure. Biochemical failure-free survival for each group was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The mean follow-up was 38 months (range 1 to 141). Results. The actuarial 4-year biochemical relapse-free rate for the PLND versus no PLND groups was 91% and 97%, respectively (P = 0.16). On multivariate analysis, PLND was not an independent predictor of outcome (P = 0.24). Conclusions. The results of our study indicate that the omission of PLND in patients with favorable tumor characteristics does not adversely affect biochemical relapse rates. UROLOGY 56: 92-95, 2000, (C) 2000, Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 95
页数:4
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY CAN BE OMITTED IN SELECTED PATIENTS WITH CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE - DEVELOPMENT OF A SYSTEM OF PATIENT SELECTION
    BISHOFF, JT
    REYES, A
    THOMPSON, IM
    HARRIS, MJ
    STCLAIR, SR
    GOMELLA, L
    BUTZIN, CA
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1995, 45 (02) : 270 - 274
  • [2] ELIMINATING THE NEED FOR BILATERAL PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY IN SELECT PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE-CANCER
    BLUESTEIN, DL
    BOSTWICK, DG
    BERGSTRALH, EJ
    OESTERLING, JE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (05) : 1315 - 1320
  • [3] OPEN PELVIC LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION FOR PROSTATE-CANCER - A REASSESSMENT
    CAMPBELL, SC
    KLEIN, EA
    LEVIN, HS
    PIEDMONTE, MR
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1995, 46 (03) : 352 - 355
  • [4] THE CONTEMPORARY INCIDENCE OF LYMPH-NODE METASTASES IN PROSTATE-CANCER - IMPLICATIONS FOR LAPAROSCOPIC LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION
    DANELLA, JF
    DEKERNION, JB
    SMITH, RB
    STECKEL, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 149 (06) : 1488 - 1491
  • [5] Evaluation of staging lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer
    El-Galley, RES
    Keane, TE
    Petros, JA
    Sanders, WH
    Clarke, HS
    Cotsonis, GA
    Graham, SD
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1998, 52 (04) : 663 - 667
  • [6] UTILITY OF PREOPERATIVE SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN CONCENTRATION AND BIOPSY GLEASON SCORE IN PREDICTING RISK OF PELVIC LYMPH-NODE METASTASES IN PROSTATE-CANCER
    NARAYAN, P
    FOURNIER, G
    GAJENDRAN, V
    LEIDICH, R
    LO, R
    WOLF, JS
    JACOB, G
    NICOLAISEN, G
    PALMER, K
    FREIHA, F
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1994, 44 (04) : 519 - 524
  • [7] THE USE OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, CLINICAL STAGE AND GLEASON SCORE TO PREDICT PATHOLOGICAL STAGE IN MEN WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER
    PARTIN, AW
    YOO, J
    CARTER, HB
    PEARSON, JD
    CHAN, DW
    EPSTEIN, JI
    WALSH, PC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (01) : 110 - 114
  • [8] LOWER INCIDENCE OF UNSUSPECTED LYMPH-NODE METASTASES IN 521 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS WITH CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER
    PETROS, JA
    CATALONA, WJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 147 (06) : 1574 - 1575
  • [9] SHOULD WE RECONSIDER THE INDICATIONS FOR ILEO-OBTURATOR NODE DISSECTION WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER
    SULLIVAN, LD
    RABBANI, F
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 75 (01): : 33 - 37