Quadratic indices for the analysis of consensus algorithms

被引:0
|
作者
Carli, Ruggero [1 ]
Garin, Federica [2 ]
Zampieri, Sandro [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Ctr Control Dynam Syst & Computat, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[2] Univ Padua, DEI, I-35131 Padua, Italy
来源
2009 INFORMATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS WORKSHOP | 2009年
关键词
AVERAGE CONSENSUS; AGENTS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Average-consensus algorithms allow to compute the average of some agents' data in a distributed way, and they are used as a basic building block in algorithms for distributed estimation, load balancing, formation and distributed control. Traditional analysis of linear average-consensus algorithms studies, for a given communication graph, the convergence rate, given by the essential spectral radius of the transition matrix (i.e. the second largest eigenvalues' modulus). For many graph families, such analysis predicts a performance which degrades when the number of agents grows, basically because spreading information across a larger graph requires a longer time. However, if you consider other well-known quadratic performance indices (involving all the eigenvalues of the transition matrix), the scaling law with respect to the number of agents can be different. This is consistent with the fact that, in many applications, for example in estimation problems, it is natural to expect that a larger number of cooperating agents has a positive, not a negative effect on performance. In this paper, we consider two different quadratic indices, which arise naturally from some estimation and control problems in which the consensus algorithm is used. We provide analytical results on their asymptotic behavior when the communication network belongs to some families of Cayley graphs. This framework includes grids on toruses in arbitrary dimensions, which are conjectured to be a good approximation of random geometric graphs; indeed, we show simulation results supporting this conjecture.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the Nonexistence of Quadratic Lyapunov Functions for Consensus Algorithms
    Olshevsky, Alex
    Tsitsiklis, John N.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2008, 53 (11) : 2642 - 2645
  • [2] Quantitative Analysis of Consensus Algorithms
    Borran, Fatemeh
    Hutle, Martin
    Santos, Nuno
    Schiper, Andre
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON DEPENDABLE AND SECURE COMPUTING, 2012, 9 (02) : 236 - 249
  • [3] Analysis and design of distributed algorithms for χ-consensus
    Cortes, Jorge
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 45TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-14, 2006, : 3363 - 3368
  • [4] On the performance of consensus based versus Lagrangian based algorithms for quadratic cost functions
    Bof, Nicoletta
    Carli, Ruggero
    Schenato, Luca
    2016 EUROPEAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ECC), 2016, : 160 - 165
  • [5] Comparative Analysis of Blockchain Consensus Algorithms
    Bach, L. M.
    Mihaljevic, B.
    Zagar, M.
    2018 41ST INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY, ELECTRONICS AND MICROELECTRONICS (MIPRO), 2018, : 1545 - 1550
  • [6] Analysis of Byzantine Fault Tolerant Consensus Algorithms
    Jo, Mingyu
    Kim, Donghyeon
    Park, Sangoh
    38TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION NETWORKING, ICOIN 2024, 2024, : 205 - 207
  • [7] Broadcast Gossip Algorithms: Design and Analysis for Consensus
    Aysal, Tuncer C.
    Yildiz, Mehmet E.
    Sarwate, Anand D.
    Scaglione, Anna
    47TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, 2008 (CDC 2008), 2008, : 4843 - 4848
  • [8] Convergence Analysis for a Class of Nonlinear Consensus Algorithms
    Ajorlou, Amir
    Momeni, Ahmadreza
    Aghdam, Amir G.
    2010 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, 2010, : 6318 - 6323
  • [9] Analysis and fast RLS algorithms of quadratic Volterra ADF
    Chao, JH
    DSP 2002: 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2002, : 749 - 752
  • [10] Analysis of Two Outsourcing Algorithms for Solving Quadratic Congruence
    Liu, Lihua
    Li, Yujie
    International Journal of Network Security, 2022, 24 (04) : 612 - 616