Intra-individual Comparison of Average Glandular Dose of Two Digital Mammography Units using Different Anode/Filter Combinations

被引:3
作者
Engelken, Florian J. F. [1 ]
Meyer, Henning [1 ]
Juran, Ralf [1 ]
Bick, Ulrich [1 ]
Fallenberg, Eva [1 ]
Diekmann, Felix [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Inst Radiol, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Breast; mammography; radiation dosage; radiation quality; tungsten; rhodium; FILM MAMMOGRAPHY; QUALITY; PERFORMANCE; REDUCTION; MORTALITY; CONTRAST; RATIO;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2009.05.012
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. The aim of this study was to compare average glandular dose (AGD) in two full-field digital mammography units using different anode/filter combinations. Materials and Methods. Mammographies of 50 consecutive patients on a mammography system using a tungsten/rhodium (W/Rh) anode/filter combination were retrospectively compared to prior examinations on a different mammography unit using combinations of Molybdenum (Mo) and Rhodium (Rh). To exclude effects of increasing patient age, two prior examinations within 5 years were used. Both views of one breast were chosen for analysis. AGD was recorded as stated by each mammography unit. Accuracy of stated AGD and contrast-detail resolution were assessed using different breast phantoms. Results. The mean AGDs from the examinations using W/Rh were 0.95 mGy and 1.01 mGy for craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views compared to 1.51 mGy and 1.54 mGy, respectively, using combinations of Mo and Rh (P < .001). Relative reduction of AGD was independent of breast thickness but decreased with increasing breast density (partial correlation coefficient of 0.46, P < .005 and 0.57, P < .001, for CC and MLO views, respectively). Low-level contrast resolution was equal in both units using standard acquisition parameters. Conclusion. In clinical mammographies, higher energy beam spectra obtained using W/Rh anode/filter combinations may significantly contribute to lowering AGD compared to Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh, and Rh/Rh in breasts that are not extremely dense.
引用
收藏
页码:1272 / 1280
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: Influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection
    Bacher, Klaus
    Smeets, Peter
    De Hauwere, An
    Voet, Tony
    Duyck, Philippe
    Verstraete, Koenraad
    Thierens, Hubert
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 58 (03) : 471 - 479
  • [2] Analysis of benefit:risk ratio and mortality reduction for the UK Breast Screening Programme
    Beckett, JR
    Kotre, CJ
    Michaelson, JS
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2003, 76 (905) : 309 - 320
  • [3] X-ray spectrum optimization of full-field digital mammography: Simulation and phantom study
    Bernhardt, Philipp
    Mertelmeier, Thomas
    Hoheisel, Martin
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (11) : 4337 - 4349
  • [4] Quality control for digital mammography in the ACRIN DMIST trial: Part 1
    Bloomquist, AK
    Yaffe, MJ
    Pisano, ED
    Hendrick, RE
    Mawdsley, GE
    Bright, S
    Shen, SZ
    Mahesh, M
    Nickoloff, EL
    Fleischman, RC
    Williams, MB
    Maidment, ADA
    Beideck, DJ
    Och, J
    Seibert, JA
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (03) : 719 - 736
  • [5] Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study
    Dance, DR
    Klang, AT
    Sandborg, M
    Skinner, CL
    Smith, IAC
    Carlsson, GA
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2000, 73 (874) : 1056 - 1067
  • [6] OPTIMAL X-RAY-SPECTRA FOR SCREEN-FILM MAMMOGRAPHY
    JENNINGS, RJ
    EASTGATE, RJ
    SIEDBAND, MP
    ERGUN, DL
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1981, 8 (05) : 629 - 639
  • [7] European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis.: Fourth edition -: summary document
    Perry, N.
    Broeders, M.
    de Wolf, C.
    Tornberg, S.
    Holland, R.
    von Karsa, L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2008, 19 (04) : 614 - 622
  • [8] Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening
    Pisano, ED
    Gatsonis, C
    Hendrick, E
    Yaffe, M
    Baum, JK
    Acharyya, S
    Conant, EF
    Fajardo, LL
    Bassett, L
    D'Orsi, C
    Jong, R
    Rebner, M
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (17) : 1773 - 1783
  • [9] COMPARISON OF TUNGSTEN AND MOLYBDENUM AS TARGET MATERIAL FOR MAMMOGRAPHIC X-RAY TUBES
    RINI, JM
    HOROWITZ, A
    BALTER, S
    WATSON, RC
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1973, 106 (03) : 657 - 661
  • [10] Radiation exposure in X-ray mammography -: A review.
    Säbel, M
    Aichinger, U
    Schulz-Wendtland, R
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2001, 173 (02): : 79 - 91