The evaluation of follow-up strategies of watch-and-wait patients with a complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer

被引:16
作者
Haak, Hester E. [1 ,2 ]
Zmuc, Jan [3 ]
Lambregts, Doenja M. J. [4 ]
Beets-Tan, Regina G. H. [2 ,4 ]
Melenhorst, Jarno [5 ]
Beets, Geerard L. [2 ,4 ]
Maas, Monique [4 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Dept Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, GROW Sch Oncol & Dev Biol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Inst Oncol Ljubljana, Dept Surg Oncol, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[4] Netherlands Canc Inst Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Dept Radiol, POB 90203, NL-1006 BE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Maastricht Univ, Dept Surg, Med Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
chemoradiotherapy; clinical complete response; follow‐ up; organ preservation; rectal cancer; watch‐ and‐ wait;
D O I
10.1111/codi.15636
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim Many of the current follow-up schedules in a watch-and-wait approach include very frequent MRI and endoscopy examinations to ensure early detection of local regrowth (LR). The aim of this study was to analyse the occurrence and detection of LR in a watch-and-wait cohort and to suggest a more efficient follow-up schedule. Method Rectal cancer patients with a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant therapy were prospectively and retrospectively included in a multicentre watch-and-wait registry between 2004 and 2018, with the current follow-up schedule with 3-monthly endoscopy and MRI in the first year and 6 monthly thereafter. A theoretical comparison was constructed for the detection of LR in the current follow-up schedule against four other hypothetical schedules. Results In all, 50/304 (16%) of patients developed a LR. The majority (98%) were detected at <= 2 years, located in the lumen (94%) and were visible on endoscopy (88%). The theoretical comparison of the different hypothetical schedules suggests that the optimal follow-up schedule should focus on the first 2 years with 3-monthly endoscopy and 3-6 monthly MRI. Longer intervals in the first 2 years will cause delays in diagnosis of LR ranging from 0 to 5 months. After 2 years, increasing the interval from 6 to 12 months did not cause important delays. Conclusion The optimal follow-up schedule for a watch-and-wait policy in patients with a clinical complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer should include frequent endoscopy and to a lesser degree MRI in the first 2 years. Longer intervals, up to 12 months, can be considered after 2 years.
引用
收藏
页码:1785 / 1792
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2021, FOLL UPO CHIR RES ST
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, RICHTLIJN COLORECTAA
  • [3] High-dose chemoradiotherapy and watchful waiting for distal rectal cancer: a prospective observational study
    Appelt, Ane L.
    Ploen, John
    Harling, Henrik
    Jensen, Frank S.
    Jensen, Lars H.
    Jorgensen, Jens C. R.
    Lindebjerg, Jan
    Rafaelsen, Soren R.
    Jakobsen, Anders
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2015, 16 (08) : 919 - 927
  • [4] Endoscopic criteria to evaluate tumor response of rectal cancer to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy using magnifying chromoendoscopy
    Chino, Akiko
    Konishi, Tsuyoshi
    Ogura, Atsushi
    Kawachi, Hiroshi
    Osumi, Hiroki
    Yoshio, Toshiyuki
    Kishihara, Teruhito
    Ide, Daisuke
    Saito, Shoichi
    Igarashi, Masahiro
    Akiyoshi, Takashi
    Ueno, Masashi
    Fujisaki, Junko
    [J]. EJSO, 2018, 44 (08): : 1247 - 1253
  • [5] Oncological and Survival Outcomes in Watch and Wait Patients With a Clinical Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis
    Dattani, Mit
    Heald, Richard J.
    Goussous, Ghaleb
    Broadhurst, Jack
    Sao Juliao, Guilherme P.
    Habr-Gama, Angelita
    Perez, Rodrigo Oliva
    Moran, Brendan J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2018, 268 (06) : 955 - 967
  • [6] A watch-and-wait approach for locally advanced rectal cancer after a clinical complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dossa, Fahima
    Chesney, Tyler R.
    Acuna, Sergio A.
    Baxter, Nancy N.
    [J]. LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 2 (07): : 501 - 513
  • [7] Watch and Wait Approach Following Extended Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Distal Rectal Cancer: Are We Getting Closer to Anal Cancer Management?
    Habr-Gama, Angelita
    Sabbaga, Jorge
    Gama-Rodrigues, Joaquim
    Sao Juliao, Guilherme P.
    Proscurshim, Igor
    Aguilar, Patricia Bailao
    Nadalin, Wladimir
    Perez, Rodrigo O.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2013, 56 (10) : 1109 - 1117
  • [8] The use of PET/MRI for imaging rectal cancer
    Hope, Thomas A.
    Kassam, Zahra
    Loening, Andreas
    McNamara, Michelle M.
    Paspulati, Raj
    [J]. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (11) : 3559 - 3568
  • [9] Organ Preservation in Rectal Cancer After Chemoradiation: Should We Extend the Observation Period in Patients with a Clinical Near-Complete Response?
    Hupkens, Britt J. P.
    Maas, Monique
    Martens, Milou H.
    van der Sande, Marit E.
    Lambregts, Doenja M. J.
    Breukink, Stephanie O.
    Melenhorst, Jarno
    Houwers, Janneke B.
    Hoff, Christiaan
    Sosef, Meindert N.
    Leijtens, Jeroen W. A.
    Berbee, Maaike
    Beets-Tan, Regina G. H.
    Beets, Geerard L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (01) : 197 - 203
  • [10] Nodal Staging of Rectal Cancer: High-Resolution Pelvic MRI Versus 18F-FDGPET/CT
    Kim, Dae Jung
    Kim, Joo Hee
    Ryu, Young Hoon
    Jeon, Tae Joo
    Yu, Jeong-Sik
    Chung, Jae-Joon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2011, 35 (05) : 531 - 534