CHAL 35-GSK v. Dudas: The US Patent and Trademark Office's rulemaking authority

被引：0

作者：

Perlinger, Sarah E. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Franklin Pierce Law Ctr, Concord, NH 03301 USA

来源：

ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY | 2008年 / 236卷

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

O6 [化学];

学科分类号：

0703 ;

摘要：

35-CHAL

引用

页数：1

共 16 条

[1] CHAL 18-Recent developments in US Patent and Trademark Office patent practice
Van Horn, Charles E.
ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2007, 234
[2] CHAL 11-Recent developments in US Patent and Trademark Office patent practice
Van Horn, Charles E.
ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2008, 236
[3] CHAL 18-Recent developments in US Patent and Trademark Office patent practice
Van Horn, Charles E.
ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 238
[4] CHAL 8-Trends in patenting: Recent developments at the US Patent and Trademark Office
Van Horn, Charles E.
ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 232
[5] Invalidating Gene Patents: Association for Molecular Pathology v. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
Mchugh, Ashley
HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL, 2010, 62 (01) : 185 - 219
[6] The US Patent and Trademark Office's Response to Recent Developments in Artificial Intelligence
Holman, Christopher M.
BIOTECHNOLOGY LAW REPORT, 2024, 43 (03) : 116 - 130
[7] Faster, better - Costlier? The US patent & trademark office's strategic plan is bold and controversial
Kariya, S
IEEE SPECTRUM, 2002, 39 (12) : 52 - +
[8] US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE RESPONDS TO INDIAN PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON INDIA'S PATENTS ACT, 1970
Zweig, Steven J.
BIOTECHNOLOGY LAW REPORT, 2018, 37 (03) : 115 - 116
[9] The US patent and trademark office's proposed information disclosure statement rules: Too novel and nonobvious
Magaziner, Russell S.
INDIANA LAW JOURNAL, 2008, 83 (02) : 719 - 741
[10] Memorandum to Patent Examining Corps: Supreme Court Decision in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. (Associate Comm'r for Patent Examination Policy, US Patent and Trademark Office, March 21, 2012)
不详
BIOTECHNOLOGY LAW REPORT, 2012, 31 (02) : 230 - 231

← 1 2 →