Relational models and engagement: an attachment theory perspective

被引:29
作者
Byrne, Zinta [1 ]
Albert, Lumina [2 ]
Manning, Steven [1 ]
Desir, Rosemond [3 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Psychol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Management, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Univ St Thomas, Opus Coll Business, Dept Accounting, St Paul, MN USA
关键词
Employee engagement; Attachment; Psychological safety; Individual differences; Psychological availability; WORK-ENGAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS; EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT; JOB DEMANDS; BEHAVIOR; AVAILABILITY; ANTECEDENTS; LEADERSHIP; RESOURCES; VARIABLES;
D O I
10.1108/JMP-01-2016-0006
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Purpose - Researchers have explored contextual antecedents influencing engagement at work; yet, theory and empirical evidence suggest some individuals are more or less engaged than others. Using a relational framework based on attachment theory, the purpose of this paper is to suggest that relational models influence engagement through their influence on psychological availability and psychological safety. Study 1 examined whether attachment influences variability in engagement. Study 2 examined whether these effects could be replicated, and whether attachment influences engagement via individuals' psychological availability and safety. Design/methodology/approach - Two field studies using online self-report surveys ( Study 1 n = 203; Study 2 n = 709). Findings - Attachment-avoidance and attachment-anxiety were independently associated with lower levels of engagement, and psychological conditions mediated these relationships. Research limitations/implications - Relational models explain predictable variability in engagement. Employees' ability to engage may be constrained or facilitated by their stable relational models of attachment. Originality/value - The study is one of the few examining individual differences in engagement.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 44
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Turning Inward or Focusing Out? Navigating Theories of Interpersonal and Ethical Cognitions to Understand Ethical Decision-Making [J].
Albert, Lumina S. ;
Reynolds, Scott J. ;
Turan, Bulent .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2015, 130 (02) :467-484
[2]   Attachment and responses to employment dissolution [J].
Albert, Lumina S. ;
Allen, David G. ;
Biggane, Jonathan E. ;
Ma, Qing .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2015, 25 (01) :94-106
[3]   Attachment Styles and Ethical Behavior: Their Relationship and Significance in the Marketplace [J].
Albert, Lumina S. ;
Horowitz, Leonard M. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2009, 87 (03) :299-316
[4]  
Bakker A. B., 2007, J MANAGERIAL PSYCHOL, V22, P309, DOI [10.1108/02683940710733115, DOI 10.1108/02683940710733115]
[5]   Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology [J].
Bakker, Arnold B. ;
Schaufeli, Wilmar B. ;
Leiter, Michael P. ;
Taris, Toon W. .
WORK AND STRESS, 2008, 22 (03) :187-200
[6]   RELATIONAL SCHEMAS AND COGNITION IN CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS [J].
BALDWIN, MW .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 1995, 12 (04) :547-552
[7]   ATTACHMENT STYLES AMONG YOUNG-ADULTS - A TEST OF A 4-CATEGORY MODEL [J].
BARTHOLOMEW, K ;
HOROWITZ, LM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 61 (02) :226-244
[8]  
Bowlby J., 1969, ATTACHMENT LOSS VOL
[9]  
Brennan K. A., 1998, ATTACHMENT THEORY CL, P46, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.PAIN.2006.07.020
[10]   The Struggle With Employee Engagement: Measures and Construct Clarification Using Five Samples [J].
Byrne, Zinta S. ;
Peters, Janet M. ;
Weston, James W. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 101 (09) :1201-1227