Locking Stand-Alone Cage Constructs for the Treatment of Cervical Spine Degenerative Disease

被引:11
作者
Alfonso De Leo-Vargas, Roberto [1 ]
Munoz-Romero, Ildefonso [1 ]
Gustavo Mondragon-Soto, Michel [1 ]
Jesus Martinez-Anda, Jaime [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer British Cowdry Hosp, Neurol Ctr, Av Carlos Graef Fernandez 154 Int 155, Mexico City 05300, DF, Mexico
关键词
Cervical spondylosis; Spondylosis; Compressive myelopathy; ANTERIOR INTERBODY FUSION; ZERO-PROFILE; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC; PEEK CAGES; DISKECTOMY; PLATE; SUBSIDENCE; OUTCOMES; SINGLE; DYSPHAGIA;
D O I
10.31616/asj.2018.0234
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Prospective case series study. Purpose: Description of the outcome of stand-alone cervical cages for single and multilevel cervical degenerative spine disease. Overview of literature: The aim of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical spine disease is to improve patient symptoms and spine stability and restore lordosis. Locking stand-alone cages were developed with the goal of minimizing soft tissue disruption anterior to the vertebrae and reducing the profile of the construct by avoiding an anterior plate, thereby maximizing ACDF benefits. Methods: This study comprises a case series of patients surgically treated between July 2015 and February 2018 who received single or multilevel ACDF with a zero-profile stand-alone cervical cage. Surgical and clinical preoperative evaluation and surgical outcomes were evaluated using pre- and postoperative Nurick, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score for myelopathy scales, cervical Cobb angles, postoperative surgical complications, and fusion and subsidence rates. Results: Fifty-three patients underwent ACDF; the mean age of these patients was 58.8 years, and their preoperative VAS, NDI, and JOA scores were 8.1, 31.6, and 15.3, respectively. The preoperative Cobb angle was 30.7 degrees. Forty-five percent of patients had one-level, 54.7% had two-level, and 13.2% had three-level procedures. On preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, foramina! stenosis was present in 94.3% of patients, whereas medullar stenosis was present in 41.5%. The rate of complications was 5.7%: two patients had postoperative dysphagia (3.7%), and one patient had a surgical site hematoma. Mean postoperative follow-up time was 6.7 months; postoperative VAS, NDI, and JOA scores were 2.4, 15.9, and 15.8, respectively. Postoperative Cobb angle was 35.9 degrees, fusion rate was 84.9%, and subsidence rate was 11.3%. Conclusions: ACDF with zero-profile stand-alone cervical devices is an excellent option for cervical degenerative disc disease of one, two, and three levels, with similar results reported when using ACDF with either cage or plate.
引用
收藏
页码:630 / 637
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Bioabsorbable self-retaining PLA/nano-sized β-TCP cervical spine interbody fusion cage in goat models: an in vivo study
    Cao, Lu
    Chen, Qian
    Jiang, Li-Bo
    Yin, Xiao-Fan
    Bian, Chong
    Wang, Hui-Ren
    Ma, Yi-Qun
    Li, Xiang-Qian
    Li, Xi-Lei
    Dong, Jian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NANOMEDICINE, 2017, 12 : 7197 - 7205
  • [2] A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with ACDF using cage and plate in the treatment of three-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up
    Chen, Yuqiao
    Lu, Guohua
    Wang, Bing
    Li, Lei
    Kuang, Lei
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (07) : 2255 - 2262
  • [3] Comparison of the clinical and radiologic outcomes obtained with single- versus two-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion using stand-alone PEEK cages filled with allograft
    Choi, Man Kyu
    Kim, Sung Bum
    Park, Chang Kyu
    Kim, Sung Min
    [J]. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2016, 158 (03) : 481 - 487
  • [4] Meta-Analysis Comparing Zero-Profile Spacer and Anterior Plate in Anterior Cervical Fusion
    Dong, Jun
    Lu, Meng
    Lu, Teng
    Liang, Baobao
    Xu, Junkui
    Zhou, Jun
    Lv, Hongjun
    Qin, Jie
    Cai, Xuan
    Huang, Sihua
    Li, Haopeng
    Wang, Dong
    He, Xijing
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (06):
  • [5] Anterior cervical Discectomy and fusion associated complications
    Fountas, Kostas N.
    Kapsalaki, Eftychia Z.
    Nikolakakos, Leonidas G.
    Smisson, Hugh F.
    Johnston, Kim W.
    Grigorian, Arthur A.
    Lee, Gregory P.
    Robinson, Joe S.
    [J]. SPINE, 2007, 32 (21) : 2310 - 2317
  • [6] Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning
    Gercek, E
    Arlet, V
    Delisle, J
    Marchesi, D
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2003, 12 (05) : 513 - 516
  • [7] Han Sang Youp, 2016, Korean J Spine, V13, P13, DOI 10.14245/kjs.2016.13.1.13
  • [8] Zero-profile hybrid fusion construct versus 2-level plate fixation to treat adjacent-level disease in the cervical spine
    Healy, Andrew T.
    Sundar, Swetha J.
    Cardenas, Raul J.
    Mageswaran, Prasath
    Benzel, Edward C.
    Mroz, Thomas E.
    Francis, Todd B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 21 (05) : 753 - 760
  • [9] Stand-alone Cervical Cages Versus Anterior Cervical Plates in 2-Level Cervical Anterior Interbody Fusion Patients Analysis of Adjacent Segment Degeneration
    Ji, Gyu Yeul
    Oh, Chang Hyun
    Shin, Dong Ah
    Ha, Yoon
    Kim, Keung Nyun
    Yoon, Do Heum
    Yudoyono, Farid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2015, 28 (07): : E433 - E438
  • [10] Risk factors for subsidence in anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages: a review of 82 cases and 182 levels
    Kao, Ting-Hsien
    Wu, Chen-Hao
    Chou, Yu-Ching
    Chen, Hsien-Te
    Chen, Wen-Hsien
    Tsou, Hsi-Kai
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2014, 134 (10) : 1343 - 1351