Using Eligibility Traces in Bidding Strategy of GENCOs in Spinning Reserve and Energy Markets for Different Market Allocation Models

被引:0
作者
Naseri-Javareshk, Seyed Mohammad Ali [1 ]
Darban, Somayeh Hasanpour [1 ]
Noori, Amin [1 ]
Kouche-Biyouki, Shahrzad Amrollahi [1 ]
机构
[1] Sadjad Univ Technol, Fac Elect & Biomed Engn, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
来源
26TH IRANIAN CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (ICEE 2018) | 2018年
关键词
bidding strategy; ancillary services; eligibility traces; agents; JOINT ENERGY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
In competitive environment of power industry, forming different markets, one of the important issues playing a key role in Generation Companies' (GENCOs) profitability, is bidding strategy. The bidding strategy means how the GENCO can earn the maximum profit through offering an appropriate price in a given period of time. Therefore, important discussions have been introduced in the market environment, such as design method, holding the tender offers and financial calculations. In such environment, GENCOs' behaviors and power markets conditions analysis through simulation can assist GENCOs and market counselors for proper designs and legislations before its implementation in a real-world environment. Paying attention to ancillary services market along with the energy market, in addition to providing the network security, make it possible to evaluate different tender offer implementation models in the market. In this paper, the effects of the energy and spinning reserve markets, in the forms of simultaneous and sequential allocation models on the GENCOs' profitability are evaluated. In this regard, GENCOs' bidding strategy using eligibility traces algorithm is investigated. In this algorithm, GENCOs as agents, through their interaction with the environment, learn to bid the price, such that they earn the maximum possible profit, in the long term.
引用
收藏
页码:1350 / 1355
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Customer choice of reliability in spinning reserve procurement and cost allocation using well-being analysis
    Ahmadi-Khatir, A.
    Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M.
    Goel, L.
    [J]. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2009, 79 (10) : 1431 - 1440
  • [2] Anamika N. Kumar, 2016, 2016 INT C EN EFF TE
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
  • [4] Energy and reserve market designs with explicit consideration to lost opportunity costs
    Gan, DQ
    Litvinov, E
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2003, 18 (01) : 53 - 59
  • [5] Joint energy and reserve markets: Current implementations and modeling trends
    Gonzalez, Pablo
    Villar, Jose
    Diaz, Cristian A.
    Alberto Campos, Fco
    [J]. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2014, 109 : 101 - 111
  • [6] Gaming analysis in joint energy and spinning reserve markets
    Haghighat, Hossein
    Seifi, Hossein
    Kian, Ashkan R.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2007, 22 (04) : 2074 - 2085
  • [7] Bidding strategies in oligopolistic dynamic electricity double-sided auctions
    Kian, AR
    Cruz, JB
    Thomas, RJ
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2005, 20 (01) : 50 - 58
  • [8] Kirschen D.S., 2004, Fundamentals of power system economics
  • [9] Liao Z., 2011, IEEE S COMP INT MULT
  • [10] Mozdawar A., 2009, IEEE BUCH POW TECH C