What do Think Tanks do? Chatham House in search of the United States

被引:1
|
作者
Cox, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] LSE IDEAS, Houghton St, London WC2A 2AE, England
关键词
US foreign policy; Chatham House; Think Tanks; Bill Clinton; 9; 11; G W Bush; AMERICAN; POWER; DECLINE; FUTURE; EMPIRE; US;
D O I
10.1057/s41311-021-00295-3
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Created in 1920, the London-based 'British Institute of International Affairs' (in 1926 renamed the Royal Institute of International Affairs) has for a century been at the forefront of an ongoing 'Anglo-American' conversation about world politics. Yet even though the Institute was regarded from the outset as the institutional expression of a very 'special relationship' between the UK and the United States, it did very little independent research of its own on US foreign policy. This however began to change in the 1990s when the United States appeared to have become a 'superpower without a mission'. It then took on a more organized form following the attack of 9/11. At this critical juncture Chatham House decided to establish a new Study Group-the 'United States Discussion Group' (USDG)-which went on to discuss US foreign policy in depth. What this article sets out to do is outline the origins of the USDG, the main contours of what was discussed within the Group, the degree to which these discussions were different to those then underway within the US itself, and finally assess the contribution it made in helping encourage further debate on the United States within Britain's foremost foreign policy Think Tank.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 226
页数:21
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [21] What do athlete's really think? Athlete perceptions and attitudes towards athlete monitoring in professional soccer
    Woolmer, Elliott
    Morris, Rhys
    Noon, Mark
    Tallis, Jason
    Clarke, Neil D.
    Eyre, Emma
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCE & COACHING, 2025,
  • [22] What do secondary school students in North-East Romania know and think about sustainable development?
    Chiriac, Mona Lissa
    Iatu, Corneliu
    INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH IN GEOGRAPHICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION, 2023, 32 (04) : 305 - 322
  • [24] What do we manipulate when reminding people of (not) having control? In search of construct validity
    Bukowski, Marcin
    Potoczek, Anna
    Barzykowski, Krystian
    Lautenbacher, Johannes
    Inzlicht, Michael
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2024, 56 (04) : 3706 - 3724
  • [25] Earnings Management in Domestic and Foreign IPOs in the United States: Do Home Country Institutions Matter?
    Filatotchev, Igor
    Jona, Jonathan
    Livne, Gilad
    EUROPEAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2020, 29 (02) : 307 - 335
  • [26] Do Sub-Cultural Norms Survive Immigration?-Cantonese and Mandarin Fertility in the United States
    Ren, Ping
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE FAMILY STUDIES, 2009, 40 (01) : 25 - +
  • [27] Arab immigrants in the United States: how and why do returns to education vary by country of origin?
    Aly, Ashraf El-Araby
    Ragan, James F., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF POPULATION ECONOMICS, 2010, 23 (02) : 519 - 538
  • [28] 'They've just never been involved in it': what senior athletes think about older people who do not participate in sport
    Cannella, Valentina
    Serrat, Rodrigo
    Villar, Feliciano
    Evans, Adam Brian
    LEISURE STUDIES, 2024, 43 (05) : 739 - 754
  • [29] Do renewable portfolio standards in the United States stunt renewable electricity development beyond mandatory targets?
    Zhou, Shan
    Solomon, Barry D.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 140 (140)
  • [30] Popular but Unstable: Explaining Why State Performance Funding Systems in the United States Often Do Not Persist
    Dougherty, Kevin J.
    Natow, Rebecca S.
    Vega, Blanca E.
    TEACHERS COLLEGE RECORD, 2012, 114 (03):