Language, procedures, and the non-perceptual origin of number word meanings

被引:39
作者
Barner, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
YOUNG-CHILDREN; APPROXIMATE NUMBER; HUMAN INFANTS; CONCEPTUAL DISTINCTION; NUMERICAL COGNITION; COUNTING PRINCIPLES; NATURAL NUMBER; OBJECT FILES; ACQUISITION; REPRESENTATIONS;
D O I
10.1017/S0305000917000058
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Perceptual representations of objects and approximate magnitudes are often invoked as building blocks that children combine to acquire the positive integers. Systems of numerical perception are either assumed to contain the logical foundations of arithmetic innately, or to supply the basis for their induction. I propose an alternative to this framework, and argue that the integers are not learned from perceptual systems, but arise to EXPLAIN perception. Using crosslinguistic and developmental data, I show that small (similar to I-4)and large (similar to 5+) numbers arise both historically and in individual children via distinct mechanisms, constituting independent learning problems, neither of which begins with perceptual building blocks. Children first learn small numbers using the same logic that supports other linguistic number marking (e.g. singular/plural). Years later, they infer the logic of counting from the relations between large number words and their roles in blind counting procedures, only incidentally associating number words with approximate magnitudes.
引用
收藏
页码:553 / 590
页数:38
相关论文
共 141 条
[31]   Open questions and a proposal: A critical review of the evidence on infant numerical abilities [J].
Cantrell, Lisa ;
Smith, Linda B. .
COGNITION, 2013, 128 (03) :331-352
[32]   Bootstrapping & the origin of concepts [J].
Carey, Susan .
DAEDALUS, 2004, 133 (01) :59-68
[33]   WHERE OUR NUMBER CONCEPTS COME FROM [J].
Carey, Susan .
JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2009, 106 (04) :220-254
[34]  
CAZDEN CB, 1968, CHILD DEV, V39, P433
[35]   To infinity and beyond: Children generalize the successor function to all possible numbers years after learning to count [J].
Cheung, Pierina ;
Rubenson, Miriam ;
Barner, David .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 92 :22-36
[36]   Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation [J].
Chierchia, Gennaro .
SYNTHESE, 2010, 174 (01) :99-149
[37]   The development of language and abstract concepts: The case of natural number [J].
Condry, Kirsten F. ;
Spelke, Elizabeth S. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2008, 137 (01) :22-38
[38]   Communicating about quantity without a language model: Number devices in homesign grammar [J].
Coppola, Marie ;
Spaepen, Elizabet ;
Goldin-Meadow, Susan .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 67 (1-2) :1-25
[39]  
Corbett G., 2000, Number
[40]   Lexical development norms for young children [J].
Dale, PS ;
Fenson, L .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 1996, 28 (01) :125-127