Social distance modulates the process of uncertain decision-making: evidence from event-related potentials

被引:12
作者
Guo, Huan [1 ]
Song, Hang [1 ]
Liu, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Xu, Kai [1 ]
Shen, Heyong [1 ]
机构
[1] South China Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
uncertain decision-making; social distance; risk-taking; Iowa Gambling Task; event-related potential; ERP; SELF-OTHER DISCREPANCIES; CONSTRUAL-LEVEL; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTANCE; REWARD MAGNITUDE; FEEDBACK; RISK; NEGATIVITY; RESPONSES; ERP; COMPONENTS;
D O I
10.2147/PRBM.S210910
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Purpose: Social distance affects risk perception in uncertain decision-making, but how this effect works and the mechanism of how social distance influences the early processing stages of uncertain decision-making are still unclear. This investigation aimed to explore how social distance influences risk-taking during uncertain decision-making using the Iowa Gambling Task with recording of event-related potentials. Methods: A total of 57 healthy subjects (36 female) participated in the modified single-choice Iowa Gambling Task when they gambled based on three quantified social distances (self, friend, and stranger). The social distance between participant and beneficiary was quantified on a scale of 0-100 points, with 0 representing self, 5 representing a close friend, and 100 representing a stranger. Results: Three stages of uncertain decision-making were analyzed. Behavioral results showed that social distance worked interactively with choice frame, and high social distance made people choose a more advantageous deck and a less disadvantageous deck than low social distance. The P300 in the choice-evaluation stage, which reflects stimulus discrimination, directly proved this result by showing that gambling for a stranger caused higher P300 when evaluating an advantageous deck and lower P300 when evaluating a disadvantageous deck than for others. Decision preceding negativity in the response-selection stage represents the anticipation of risky choices: this was larger with high social distance when choosing a disadvantageous deck. Feedback-related negativity and feedback-related P300 had motivational significance, showing smaller amplitudes when gambling for a stranger than for oneself. Conclusion: These results provide evidence that social distance works interactively with choice frames of uncertain decision-making. People at high social distance are more risk-taking in an advantageous frame and more risk-avoid ant in a disadvantageous frame.
引用
收藏
页码:701 / 714
页数:14
相关论文
共 86 条
[21]   Understanding Self-Control as a Whole vs. Part Dynamic [J].
Fujita, Kentaro ;
Carnevale, Jessica J. ;
Trope, Yaacov .
NEUROETHICS, 2018, 11 (03) :283-296
[22]   Doc, What Would You Do If You Were Me? On Self-Other Discrepancies in Medical Decision Making [J].
Garcia-Retamero, Rocio ;
Galesic, Mirta .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2012, 18 (01) :38-51
[23]   The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses [J].
Gehring, WJ ;
Willoughby, AR .
SCIENCE, 2002, 295 (5563) :2279-2282
[24]   Neural Correlates of Successful and Unsuccessful Strategical Mechanisms Involved in Uncertain Decision-Making [J].
Giustiniani, Julie ;
Gabriel, Damien ;
Nicolier, Magali ;
Monnin, Julie ;
Haffen, Emmanuel .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (06)
[25]   The neural basis of decision making [J].
Gold, Joshua I. ;
Shadlen, Michael N. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 30 :535-574
[26]   Anxiety and feedback negativity [J].
Gu, Ruolei ;
Huang, Yu-Xia ;
Luo, Yue-Jia .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 47 (05) :961-967
[27]   Somatic markers and explicit knowledge are both involved in decision-making [J].
Guillaume, Sebastien ;
Jollant, Fabrice ;
Jaussent, Isabelle ;
Lawrence, Natalia ;
Malafosse, Alain ;
Courtet, Philippe .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2009, 47 (10) :2120-2124
[28]   Why are friends special?: Implementing a social interaction simulation task to probe the neural correlates of friendship [J].
Guroglu, Berna ;
Haselager, Gerbert J. T. ;
van Lieshout, Cornelis F. M. ;
Takashima, Atsuko ;
Rijpkema, Mark ;
Fernandez, Guillen .
NEUROIMAGE, 2008, 39 (02) :903-910
[29]   The anterior cingulate and reward-guided selection of actions [J].
Hadland, KA ;
Rushworth, MFS ;
Gaffan, D ;
Passingham, RE .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 89 (02) :1161-1164
[30]   The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes [J].
Hajcak, G ;
Moser, JS ;
Holroyd, CB ;
Simons, RF .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 71 (02) :148-154