Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Correlates With Modified Harris Hip Score in Total Hip Arthroplasty

被引:18
|
作者
Harold, Ryan E. [1 ]
Butler, Bennet A. [1 ]
Delagrammaticas, Dimitri [1 ]
Sullivan, Ryan [1 ]
Stover, Michael [1 ]
Manning, David W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 676 N St Clair,Ste 1350, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
MINIMALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES; PHYSICAL FUNCTION; PAIN INTERFERENCE; PROMIS; INSTRUMENTS; REGISTRIES; VALIDITY; RESPONSIVENESS; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.3928/01477447-20201202-02
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) is a validated and disease-specitic instrument commonly used to assess outcomes in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a validated, computer adaptive testing (CAI) based global health assessment tool. The authors' goal was to examine the correlation between PROMIS Pain Interference and Physical Function CATs and the mHHS in patients undergoing primary THA. All THAs were performed by 1 of 2 fellowship-trained dedicated total joint surgeons at 1 academic institution. Patients completed PROMIS and mHHS assessments preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 52 weeks postoperatively. Descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation values were determined. A total of 48 patients were prospectively enrolled in the study. Preoperatively, mean total PROMIS score (Pain Interference and Physical Function) was 74.2 and ml II IS was 50.8. Preoperatively, mean total PROMIS score showed a moderate correlation (r=0.56; P<.0001) with total mHHS. Postoperatively, mean total PROMIS score at 3, 6, 12, and 52 weeks was 82.4, 93.4, 100, and 100, respectively (all P<.01 vs baseline), and mHHS was 68.2, 81.1, 85.9, and 88.6, respectively (all P<.01). At 3, 6, 12, and 52 weeks postoperatively, a strong and consistent correlation was observed between the total PROMIS score and mHHS (r=0.74, 0.74, 0.73, and 0.80, respectively; all P<.0001). The PROMIS Pain Interference and Physical Function CATS accurately assessed preoperative pain and dysfunction, as well as clinical improvement following THA. Combined PROMIS Pain Interference and Physical Function is comparable to the mHHS when assessing outcome following THA for osteoarthritis.
引用
收藏
页码:E19 / E25
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Feasible in Bundled Payment for Care Improvement in Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients?
    Lawrie, Charles M.
    Abu-Amer, Wahid
    Barrack, Robert L.
    Clohisy, John C.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (05) : 1179 - 1185
  • [2] Modified Harris Hip Score as patient-reported outcome measure in osteoarthritic patients: psychometric properties of the Greek version
    Stasi, Sophia
    Papathanasiou, George
    Diochnou, Afroditi
    Polikreti, Basiliki
    Chalimourdas, Antonios
    Macheras, George A.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 31 (04) : 516 - 525
  • [3] Early Experience and Results Using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Scores in Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
    Stiegel, Kelly R.
    Lash, Jonathan G.
    Peace, Andrew J.
    Coleman, Michelle M.
    Harrington, Melvyn A.
    Cahill, Catherine W.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (10) : 2313 - 2318
  • [4] Does the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Correlate to Legacy Scores in Measuring Physical Health in Young Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients?
    Abu-Amer, Wahid
    Lawrie, Charles M.
    Thapa, Susan
    Nepple, Jeffrey J.
    Clohisy, John C.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (10) : 3478 - 3484
  • [5] Do You PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)? Physical Function and Pain Interference Scores After Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty
    Penrose, Colin T.
    George, Steven Z.
    Bolognesi, Michael P.
    Bhavsar, Nrupen A.
    Horn, Maggie E.
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2023, 23
  • [6] Preoperative Factors and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Multivariable Prediction Modeling
    Aggarwal, Ashwin
    Naylor, Justine M.
    Adie, Sam
    Liu, Victor K.
    Harris, Ian A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (04) : 714 - +
  • [7] The Recovery Curve for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Patient-Reported Physical Function and Pain Interference Computerized Adaptive Tests After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Kagan, Ryland
    Anderson, Mike B.
    Christensen, Jesse C.
    Peters, Christopher L.
    Gililland, Jeremy M.
    Pelt, Christopher E.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (08) : 2471 - 2474
  • [8] Comparison between the Harris- and Oxford Hip Score to evaluate outcomes one-year after total hip arthroplasty
    Weel, Hanneke
    Lindeboom, Robert
    Kuipers, Sander E.
    Vervest, Ton M. J. S.
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2017, 83 (01): : 98 - 109
  • [9] Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Is Not as Responsive as Legacy Scores in Detecting Patient Outcomes in Hip Preservation: A Systematic Review
    Jan, Kyleen
    Krivicich, Laura
    Hevesi, Mario
    Nho, Shane
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2023, 39 (03) : 838 - 850
  • [10] Appraisal and patient-reported outcomes following total hip arthroplasty: a longitudinal cohort study
    Schwartz, Carolyn E.
    Rapkin, Bruce D.
    Sniderman, Jhase
    Finkelstein, Joel A.
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2022, 6 (01)