Treatment Outcome of Adolescent Inpatients With Early-Onset and Adolescent-Onset Disruptive Behavior

被引:3
作者
de Boer, Sjoukje Berdina Beike [1 ,2 ]
Boon, Albert Eduard [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Verheij, Fop [5 ,6 ]
Donker, Marianne Catharina Henriette [6 ,7 ]
Vermeiren, Robert [4 ,8 ]
机构
[1] De Fjord, Ctr Orthopsychiat & Forens Youth Psychiat, Poortmolen 121, NL-2906 RN Capelle Aan Den Ijssel, Netherlands
[2] De Jutters, Ctr Youth Mental Healthcare Haaglanden, The Hague, Netherlands
[3] Lucertis, Child & Adolescent Psychiat, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus MC Sophia, Sophia Childrens Hosp, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Erasmus MC Univ Med Ctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[7] Minist Hlth Welf & Sport, Bilthoven, Netherlands
[8] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
adolescent psychiatry; early-onset; adolescent-onset; disruptive behavior; treatment outcome; SCL-90-R; LIFE-COURSE-PERSISTENT; CONDUCT PROBLEMS; DEVELOPMENTAL TRAJECTORIES; ANTISOCIAL-BEHAVIOR; MENTAL-HEALTH; FOLLOW-UP; CHILDHOOD; DISORDER; PREDICTORS; PSYCHOPATHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1002/jclp.22341
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: Unlike adolescents with adolescent-onset (AO) disruptive behavior, adolescents with early-onset (EO) disruptive behavior may not benefit from treatment. Method: Using Symptom Checklist (SCL-90-R) ratings at admission and discharge of adolescent inpatients with EO (n = 85) and AO (n = 60) disruptive behavior treatment outcome was determined by (a) a change in mean scores and (b) the Reliable Change Index. For a subgroup, ratings on the Satisfaction Questionnaire Residential Youth Care for Parents (n = 83) were used to verify the treatment outcome. Results: Inpatients with EO disruptive behavior had a higher risk of dropout (44.4%) from treatment than the AO group (24.7%). Among the treatment completers, both onset groups reported improvements on the SCL-90-R, with 26.9% recovering and 31.7% improving. Inpatients who reported improvement were mostly rated as improved by their parents (r = .33). Conclusion: As EO inpatients are more likely to drop out, interventions should aim at motivating youngsters to continue treatment, particularly given the poor outcome in this group. Treatment may benefit both groups because those EO youths who stayed in treatment improved to the same extent as AO inpatients. (C) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:466 / 478
页数:13
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Achenbach TM, 2001, Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles: An integrated system of multi-informant Assessment
[2]   Distinguishing the early-onset/persistent and adolescence-onset antisocial behavior types: From birth to 16 years [J].
Aguilar, B ;
Sroufe, LA ;
Egeland, B ;
Carlson, E .
DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2000, 12 (02) :109-132
[3]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, ONL ASS MEAS SEV DIS
[4]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHOLOOG
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, International Classification of Diseases
[6]   Changes in waiting-list patients over time: data on some commonly-used measures. Beware! [J].
Arrindell, WA .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2001, 39 (10) :1227-1247
[7]  
Arrindell WA, 2003, SCL-90.. Handleiding bij een multidimensionele psychopathologie-indicator
[8]   Adult mental health and social outcomes of adolescent girls with depression and conduct disorder [J].
Bardone, AM ;
Moffitt, TE ;
Caspi, A ;
Dickson, N ;
Silva, PA .
DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 1996, 8 (04) :811-829
[9]   An empirical examination of adolescence-limited offending: A direct test of Moffitt's maturity gap thesis [J].
Barnes, J. C. ;
Beaver, Kevin M. .
JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2010, 38 (06) :1176-1185
[10]  
BARTELS A, 2001, KINDER JEUGDPSYCHOTH, V28, P5