Systematic review of body image measures

被引：128

作者：

Kling, Johanna ^{[1
]}

Kwakkenbos, Linda ^{[2
]}

Diedrichs, Phillippa C. ^{[3
]}

Rumsey, Nichola ^{[3
]}

Frisen, Ann ^{[1
]}

Brandao, Maria Piedade ^{[4
,5
]}

Silva, Anabela G. ^{[4
,5
]}

Dooley, Barbara ^{[6
]}

Rodgers, Rachel F. ^{[7
,8
]}

Fitzgerald, Amanda ^{[6
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Psychol, Box 500, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden

[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Clin Psychol, Behav Sci Inst, Postbus 9104, NL-6500 Nijmegen, Netherlands

[3] Univ West England, Ctr Appearance Res, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England

[4] Univ Aveiro, Sch Hlth Sci, Campus Univ Santiago, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal

[5] Univ Aveiro, Cintesis, Campus Univ Santiago, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal

[6] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Psychol, Dublin 4, Ireland

[7] Northeastern Univ, Dept Appl Psychol, APPEAR, Boston, MA 02115 USA

[8] CHRU Montpellier, Lapeyronie Hosp, Dept Psychiat Emergency & Acute Care, Montpellier, France

来源：

BODY IMAGE | 2019年 / 30卷

关键词：

Body image; Systematic review; Measurement properties; Self-report questionnaire; Clinical practice; Psychometric; EATING-DISORDER EXAMINATION; SELF-RELATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; MUSCULARITY SCALE DMS; FEMALE UNIVERSITY-STUDENTS; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; SHAPE QUESTIONNAIRE; APPRECIATION SCALE-2; SPANISH VERSION; EDE-Q;

D O I：

10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.06.006

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

This systematic review synthesizes and critically appraises measurement properties of influential body image measures. Eight measures that met the definition of an assessment of body image (i.e., an individual's cognitive or affective evaluation of their body or appearance with a positive or negative valence), and scored high on systematic expert priority ranking, were included. These measures were: the Body Appreciation Scale (original BAS and BAS-2), the Body Esteem Scale for Adolescents and Adults, the Body Shape Questionnaire, the Centre for Appearance Research Valence Scale, the Drive for Muscularity Scale, two subscales of the Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire, one subscale of the Eating Disorder Inventory 3, and two subscales of the Multidimensional Body Relations Questionnaire. Articles assessing these scales' psychometric properties (N = 136) were evaluated for their methodological quality using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist, and a best evidence synthesis was performed. The results supported the majority of measures in terms of reliability and validity; however, suitability varied across populations, and some measurement properties were insufficiently evaluated. The measures are discussed in detail, including recommendations for their future use in research and clinical practice. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：170 / 211

页数：42

共 185 条

[1] Validity and Reliability of a Turkish Version of the Body Shape Questionnaire Among Female High School Students: Preliminary Examination [J].