Carbon dioxide utilization in concrete curing or mixing might not produce a net climate benefit

被引:122
作者
Ravikumar, Dwarakanath [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Duo [3 ]
Keoleian, Gregory [1 ]
Miller, Shelie [1 ]
Sick, Volker [4 ]
Li, Victor [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ctr Sustainable Syst CSS, Sch Environm & Sustainabil SEAS, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Natl Renewable Energy Lab NREL, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Mech Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; CO2; CAPTURE; POWER-PLANT; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; STORAGE; GENERATION; SEQUESTRATION; PERFORMANCE; DURABILITY;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-021-21148-w
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Carbon capture and utilization for concrete production (CCU concrete) is estimated to sequester 0.1 to 1.4 gigatons of carbon dioxide (CO2) by 2050. However, existing estimates do not account for the CO2 impact from the capture, transport and utilization of CO2, change in compressive strength in CCU concrete and uncertainty and variability in CCU concrete production processes. By accounting for these factors, we determine the net CO2 benefit when CCU concrete produced from CO2 curing and mixing substitutes for conventional concrete. The results demonstrate a higher likelihood of the net CO2 benefit of CCU concrete being negative i.e. there is a net increase in CO2 in 56 to 68 of 99 published experimental datasets depending on the CO2 source. Ensuring an increase in compressive strength from CO2 curing and mixing and decreasing the electricity used in CO2 curing are promising strategies to increase the net CO2 benefit from CCU concrete. Carbon curing or mixing in concrete is promising for carbon dioxide sequestration. Here, the authors show that the increased use of binder material to compensate the loss in compressive strength and electricity for carbon dioxide curing is more likely to increase carbon dioxide emissions on a life cycle basis for carbon cured or mixed concrete.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 99 条
[21]  
Hassan H.E., 2014, J CLEAN ENERGY TECHN, V2, P287, DOI DOI 10.7763/JOCET.2014.V2.141
[22]   Flue gas carbonation of cement-based building products [J].
He, Zhen ;
Wang, Sam ;
Mahoutian, Mehrdad ;
Shao, Yixin .
JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION, 2020, 37 :309-319
[23]   The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal [J].
Hepburn, Cameron ;
Adlen, Ella ;
Beddington, John ;
Carter, Emily A. ;
Fuss, Sabine ;
Mac Dowell, Niall ;
Minx, Jan C. ;
Smith, Pete ;
Williams, Charlotte K. .
NATURE, 2019, 575 (7781) :87-97
[24]  
IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, 2004, IMPROVEMENT POWER GE
[25]  
International Energy Agency, 2019, Cement Production
[26]   Life Cycle Modeling of Concrete Bridge Design: Comparison of Engineered Cementitious Composite Link Slabs and Conventional Steel Expansion Joints [J].
Keoleian, Gregory A. ;
Kendall, Alissa ;
Dettling, Jonathan E. ;
Smith, Vanessa M. ;
Chandler, Richard F. ;
Lepech, Michael D. ;
Li, Victor C. .
JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2005, 11 (01) :51-60
[27]   Life cycle investigation of CO2 recovery and sequestration [J].
Khoo, Hsien H. ;
Tan, Reginald B. H. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 40 (12) :4016-4024
[28]   A life cycle assessment study of a Canadian post-combustion carbon dioxide capture process system [J].
Koiwanit, Jarotwan ;
Piewkhaow, Lakkana ;
Zhou, Qing ;
Manuilova, Anastassia ;
Chan, Christine W. ;
Wilson, Malcolm ;
Tontiwachwuthikul, Paitoon .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2014, 19 (02) :357-369
[29]   Life cycle assessment of a pulverized coal power plant with post-combustion capture, transport and storage of CO2 [J].
Koornneef, Joris ;
van Keulen, Tim ;
Faaij, Andre ;
Turkenburg, Wim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2008, 2 (04) :448-467
[30]   Life cycle modelling of fossil fuel power generation with post-combustion CO2 capture [J].
Korre, Anna ;
Nie, Zhenggang ;
Durucan, Sevket .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2010, 4 (02) :289-300