Development of flow cytogenetics and physical genome mapping in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

被引:24
|
作者
Vlácilová, K
Ohri, D
Vrána, J
Cíhalíková, J
Kubaláková, M
Kahl, G
Dolezel, J
机构
[1] Inst Expt Bot, Lab Mol Cytogenet & Cytometry, CZ-77200 Olomouc, Czech Republic
[2] Natl Bot Res Inst, Lucknow 226001, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] Bioctr, D-60439 Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
cell cycle; chickpea (Cicer arietinum); flow cytometry; fluorescence; in-situ hybridization; genetic mapping; physical mapping;
D O I
10.1023/A:1021584914931
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Procedures for flow cytometric analysis and sorting of mitotic chromosomes (flow cytogenetics) have been developed for chickpea ( Cicer arietinum). Suspensions of intact chromosomes were prepared from root tips treated to achieve a high degree of metaphase synchrony. The optimal protocol consisted of a treatment of roots with 2 mmol/ L hydroxyurea for 18 h, a 4.5- h recovery in hydroxyurea- free medium, 2 h incubation with 10 mmol/ L oryzalin, and ice- water treatment overnight. This procedure resulted in an average metaphase index of 47%. Synchronized root tips were fixed in 2% formaldehyde for 20 min, and chromosome suspensions prepared by mechanical homogenization of fixed root tips. More than 4 x 10(5) morphologically intact chromosomes could be isolated from 15 root tips. Flow cytometric analysis of DAPI- stained chromosomes resulted in histograms of relative fluorescence intensity (flow karyotypes) containing eight peaks, representing individual chromosomes and/ or groups of chromosomes with a similar relative DNA content. Five peaks could be assigned to individual chromosomes ( A, B, C, G, H). The purity of sorted chromosome fractions was high, and chromosomes B and H could be sorted with 100% purity. PCR on flow- sorted chromosome fractions with primers for sequence- tagged microsatellite site ( STMS) markers permitted assignment of the genetic linkage group LG8 to the smallest chickpea chromosome H. This study extends the number of legume species for which flow cytogenetics is available, and demonstrates the potential of flow cytogenetics for genome mapping in chickpea.
引用
收藏
页码:695 / 706
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An advanced draft genome assembly of a desi type chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Parween, Sabiha
    Nawaz, Kashif
    Roy, Riti
    Pole, Anil K.
    Suresh, B. Venkata
    Misra, Gopal
    Jain, Mukesh
    Yadav, Gitanjali
    Parida, Swarup K.
    Tyagi, Akhilesh K.
    Bhatia, Sabhyata
    Chattopadhyay, Debasis
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
  • [22] Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L)
    Singh, KB
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1997, 53 (1-3) : 161 - 170
  • [23] Complete genome sequence of a novel polerovirus infecting chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Chiquito-Almanza, E.
    Acosta-Gallegos, J. A.
    Anaya-Lopez, J. L.
    ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY, 2022, 167 (12) : 2783 - 2788
  • [24] Study of direct selection in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Dubey, Kashyap Kumar
    Srivastava, S. B. L.
    PLANT ARCHIVES, 2007, 7 (01): : 211 - 212
  • [25] Tissue culture studies in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Reddy, KJ
    Vanidevi, M
    PERSPECTIVES IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2001, : 131 - 132
  • [26] A gene for leaf necrosis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Gaur, PM
    Gour, VK
    JOURNAL OF HEREDITY, 2000, 91 (01) : 79 - 81
  • [27] TOLERANCE OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) CULTIVARS TO THE MAJOR CHICKPEA HERBICIDES
    Khan, M. I.
    Hassan, G.
    Khan, I.
    Marwat, K. B.
    Khan, N. U.
    Gul, R.
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2011, 43 (05) : 2497 - 2501
  • [28] Flow behaviour of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) flour dispersions:: effect of additives
    Ravi, R
    Bhattacharya, S
    JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING, 2004, 65 (04) : 619 - 624
  • [29] Integrated weed management in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Merga, Bulti
    Alemu, Nano
    COGENT FOOD & AGRICULTURE, 2019, 5 (01):
  • [30] An efficient transformation system for chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    G. Senthil
    B. Williamson
    R. D. Dinkins
    G. Ramsay
    Plant Cell Reports, 2004, 23 : 297 - 303