Methane Adsorption Rate and Diffusion Characteristics in Marine Shale Samples from Yangtze Platform, South China

被引:19
作者
Dang, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jinchuan [1 ,2 ]
Wei, Xiaoliang [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Xuan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Chenghu [3 ]
Chen, Qian [1 ,2 ]
Lei, Yue [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Sch Energy Resources, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Geosci, Minist Land & Resources, Key Lab Shale Gas Explorat & Evaluat, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[3] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Crustal Dynam, Key Lab Crustal Dynam, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
关键词
marine shale; adsorption rate characteristics; methane diffusivity; diffusion model; lost gas content estimation; PORE STRUCTURE; GEOLOGICAL CONTROLS; GAS-FLOW; TRANSPORT-PROPERTIES; ACTIVATED DIFFUSION; SORPTION CAPACITY; SICHUAN BASIN; SURFACE-AREA; COAL; PRESSURE;
D O I
10.3390/en10050626
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Knowledge of the gas adsorption rate and diffusion characteristics in shale are very important to evaluate the gas transport properties. However, research on methane adsorption rate characteristics and diffusion behavior in shale is not well established. In this study, high-pressure methane adsorption isotherms and methane adsorption rate data from four marine shale samples were obtained by recording the pressure changes against time at 1-s intervals for 12 pressure steps. Seven pressure steps were selected for modelling, and three pressure steps of low (similar to 0.4 MPa), medium (similar to 4.0 MPa), and high (similar to 7.0 MPa) were selected for display. According to the results of study, the methane adsorption under low pressure attained equilibrium much more quickly than that under medium and high pressure, and the adsorption rate behavior varied between different pressure steps. By fitting the diffusion models to the methane adsorption rate data, the unipore diffusion model based upon unimodal pore size distribution failed to describe the methane adsorption rate, while the bidisperse diffusion model could reasonably describe most of the experimental adsorption rate data, with the exception of sample YY2-1 at high pressure steps. This phenomenon may be related to the restricted assumption on pore size distribution and linear adsorption isotherm. The diffusion parameters alpha and beta/alpha obtained from the bidisperse model indicated that both macro-and micropore diffusion controlled the methane adsorption rate in shale samples, as well as the relative importance and influence of micropore diffusion and adsorption to adsorption rate and total adsorption increased with increasing pressure. This made the inflection points, or two-stage process, at higher pressure steps not as evident as at low pressure steps, and the adsorption rate curves became less steep with increasing pressure. This conclusion was also supported by the decreasing difference values with increasing pressures between macro-and micropore diffusivities obtained using the bidisperse model, which is roughly from 10(-3) to 10(0), and 10(-3) to 10(-1), respectively. Additionally, an evident negative correlation between macropore diffusivities and pressure lower than 3-4 MPa was observed, while the micropore diffusivities only showed a gentle decreasing trend with pressure. A mirror image relationship between the variation in the value of macropore diffusivity and adsorption isotherms was observed, indicating the negative correlation between surface coverage and gas diffusivity. The negative correlation of methane diffusivity with pressure and surface coverage may be related to the increasing degree of pore blockage and the decreasing concentration gradient of methane adsorption. Finally, due to the significant deviation between the unipore model and experimental adsorption rate data, a new estimation method based upon the bidisperse model is proposed here.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MTT11572011
[2]  
[Anonymous], METCCR7918 US DEP EN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, GRI940396
[4]   DETERMINATION OF DESORBABLE GAS CONCENTRATION OF COAL (DIRECT METHOD) [J].
BERTARD, C ;
BRUYET, B ;
GUNTHER, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 1970, 7 (01) :43-&
[5]   Adsorption rate characteristics of methane and CO2 in coal samples from Raniganj and Jharia coalfields of India [J].
Bhowmik, Santanu ;
Dutta, Pratik .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2013, 113 :50-59
[6]   Methane and carbon dioxide adsorption-diffusion experiments on coal: upscaling and modeling [J].
Busch, A ;
Gensterblum, Y ;
Krooss, BM ;
Littke, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2004, 60 (2-4) :151-168
[7]   Geological controls on coalbed methane reservoir capacity and gas content [J].
Bustin, RM ;
Clarkson, CR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 1998, 38 (1-2) :3-26
[8]   Maximum paleotemperature of main Paleozoic argillutite in the Eastern Sichuan Basin [J].
Cao Huan-Yu ;
Zhu Chuan-Qing ;
Qiu Nan-Sheng .
CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2016, 59 (03) :1017-1029
[9]  
[曹涛涛 Cao Taotao], 2015, [天然气地球科学, Natural Gas Geoscience], V26, P2208
[10]   Characterizing the pore structure in the Silurian and Permian shales of the Sichuan Basin, China [J].
Cao, Taotao ;
Song, Zhiguang ;
Wang, Sibo ;
Cao, Xinxing ;
Li, Yan ;
Xia, Jia .
MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY, 2015, 61 :140-150