Clinical outcome following stimulation with highly purified hMG or recombinant FSH in patients undergoing IVF: a randomized assessor-blind controlled trial

被引:236
|
作者
Andersen, Anders Nyboe
Devroey, Paul
Arce, Joan-Carles
机构
[1] Rigshosp, Fertil Clin, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Vrije Univ Brussel VIB, Ctr Reprod Med, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Ferring Pharmaceut AS, Clin Res & Dev, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
embryo quality; highly purified menotrophin; IVF; pregnancy; recombinant FSH;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/del284
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: LH activity may influence treatment response and outcome in IVF cycles. METHODS: A randomized, assessor-blind, multinational trial compared ongoing pregnancy rates (primary end-point) in 731 women undergoing IVF after stimulation with highly purified menotrophin (HP-hMG) (n = 363) or recombinant FSH (rFSH) (n = 368) following a long GnRH agonist protocol. Patients received identical pre- and post-randomization interventions. One or two embryos were transferred on day 3. RESULTS: More oocytes were retrieved (P < 0.001) after rFSH treatment (11.8) compared with HP-hMG treatment (10.0), but a higher proportion developed into top-quality embryos (P = 0.044) with HP-hMG (11.3%) than with rFSH (9.0%). At the end of stimulation, lower estradiol (E-2) (P = 0.031) and higher progesterone (P < 0.001) levels were found with rFSH, even after adjusting for follicular response. The distribution of hypo-, iso- and hyper-echogenic endometrium showed a significant (P = 0.023) shift towards the hyperechogenic pattern after rFSH treatment. The ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle was 27% with HP-hMG and 22% with rFSH [odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 1.25 (0.89-1.75)]. CONCLUSION: Superiority of HP-hMG over rFSH in ongoing pregnancy rate could not be concluded from this study, but non-inferiority was established. Pharmacodynamic differences in follicular development, oocyte/embryo quality, endocrine response and endometrial echogenicity exist between HP-hMG and rFSH preparations, which may be relevant for treatment outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:3217 / 3227
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical outcome following stimulation with highly purified hMG or recombinant FSH in patients undergoing their first treatment cycle of IVF or ICSI
    Bjercke, Sverre
    Tanbo, Tom
    Abyholm, Thomas
    Omland, Anne
    Opoien, Hans Kristian
    Fedorcsak, Peter
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2010, 89 (08) : 1053 - 1060
  • [2] A randomized assessor-blind trial comparing highly purified hMG and recombinant FSH in a GnRH antagonist cycle with compulsory single-blastocyst transfer
    Devroey, Paul
    Pellicer, Antonio
    Andersen, Anders Nyboe
    Arce, Joan-Carles
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2012, 97 (03) : 561 - 571
  • [3] Comparison between stimulation with highly purified hMG or recombinant FSH in patients undergoing IVF with GnRH antagonist protocol
    Shavit, Tal
    Shalom-Paz, Einat
    Samara, Nivin
    Aslih, Nardin
    Michaeli, Madiea
    Ellenbogen, Adrian
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2016, 32 (08) : 629 - 633
  • [4] Clinical outcome following stimulation with HMG versus highly purified HMG in patients undergoing ICSI
    Foutouh, Ismail Aboul
    Khattab, Sherif
    Mohesn, Iman Abdel
    Moaz, Mohamed
    Al-Inany, Hesham
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2007, 14 (02) : 145 - 147
  • [5] Outcome of in vitro fertilization following stimulation with highly purified hMG or recombinant FSH in downregulated women of advanced reproductive age: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial
    Ye, Hong
    Huang, Guoning
    Pei, Li
    Zeng, Pinghong
    Luo, Xiu
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2012, 28 (07) : 540 - 544
  • [6] Highly purified HMG versus recombinant FSH for ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles
    Platteau, Peter
    Andersen, Anders Nyboe
    Loft, Anne
    Smitz, Johan
    Danglas, Pascal
    Devroey, Paul
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2008, 17 (02) : 190 - 198
  • [7] A RANDOMIZED, ASSESSOR-BLIND, DOSE-RESPONSE TRIAL IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CONTROLLED OVARIAN STIMULATION FOR IVF/ICSI WITH A NOVEL RECOMBINANT FSH PREPARATION (FE 999049) DERIVED FROM A HUMAN CELL-LINE.
    Arce, J. -C.
    Andersen, A. Nyboe
    Fernandez-Sanchez, M.
    Bosch, E.
    Visnova, H.
    Fauser, B. J. C. M.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (03) : S59 - S59
  • [8] A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing highly purified hMG with recombinant FSH in women undergoing ICSI: ovarian response and clinical outcomes
    Kilani, Z
    Dakkak, A
    Ghunaim, S
    Cognigni, GE
    Tabarelli, C
    Parmegiani, L
    Filicori, M
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 (06) : 1194 - 1199
  • [9] Clinical efficacy of highly purified urinary FSH versus recombinant FSH in volunteers undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a randomized, multicenter, investigator-blind trial
    Baker, Valerie L.
    Fujimoto, Victor Y.
    Kettel, L. Michael
    Adamson, G. David
    Hoehler, Fred
    Jones, Clarence E.
    Soules, Michael R.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 91 (04) : 1005 - 1011
  • [10] Controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproduction techniques:: a randomized, prospective, assessor-blind multicentre study comparing the efficacy and safety of recombinant FSH (Gonal-F®) with highly purified urinary FSH (Metrodin HP®)
    Schats, R
    De Sutter, P
    Bassil, S
    Kremer, JAM
    Tournaye, H
    Donnez, J
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 : 45 - 46