Negative-Emission Technologies and Patent Rights after COVID-19

被引:3
作者
Sarnoff, Joshua D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Depaul Univ, Coll Law, Chicago, IL 60604 USA
关键词
intellectual property and patents; compulsory licensing; march-in rights; geoengineering; negative-emission technologies (NETS); carbon-dioxide removal; biomass energy with carbon capture and sequestration (BECCS); direct air capture (DAC); INNOVATION; ANTITRUST; ACCESS; PRICE; CO2;
D O I
10.1163/18786561-10030001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Governmental and particularly private funding has recently and dramatically expanded for both BECCS and DAC technologies. This funding and the associated research, development, and deployment efforts will generate intellectual property rights, particularly patent rights in NETS. As with access to medicines, the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted concerns that patent rights may incentivize RD&D at the cost of affordable access to the relevant technologies. Further, access may be restricted to particular countries based on sovereignty concerns to seek preferential supply agreements through up-front funding. As a result, nations will likely turn to controversial ex-post measures, such as compulsory licensing, to assure access and to control prices of the needed technologies. The same concerns with patent rights likely will affect RD&D of NETS. Although international ex-ante measures exist (such as patent pools) which would help to minimize these concerns, such measures may not induce the requisite voluntary contributions, or may fail to materialize due to political disagreements. Focusing on both US law and international developments, this article proposes various ex-ante measures that can be adopted by national governments and private funders to minimize the likely forthcoming worldwide conflicts that will arise over balancing innovation incentives for, and affordable access to, patented NETS.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 265
页数:41
相关论文
共 170 条
  • [21] Black Samantha, SHARING IS CARING WH
  • [22] What's in a Concept? Global Public Goods, International Law, and Legitimacy
    Bodansky, Daniel
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2012, 23 (03) : 651 - 668
  • [23] Bollyky TJ, 2020, FOREIGN AFF, V99, P96
  • [24] Compulsory licensing, price controls, and access to patented foreign products
    Bond, Eric W.
    Saggi, Kamal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2014, 109 : 217 - 228
  • [25] Incentives and stability of international climate coalitions: An integrated assessment
    Bosetti, Valentina
    Carraro, Carlo
    De Cian, Enrica
    Masetti, Emanuele
    Tavoni, Massimo
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 55 : 44 - 56
  • [26] Brachman Steve, 2020, STAT
  • [27] Bronin Sara C, 2020, STANFORD LAW REV ONL, V72, P155
  • [28] Privatized Pharmaceutical Innovation vs Access to Essential Medicines A Global Framework for Equitable Sharing of Benefits
    Burci, Gian Luca
    Gostin, Lawrence O.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 317 (05): : 473 - 474
  • [29] California Institute of Technology, 2007, PUBLIC INTEREST NINE
  • [30] California Legislative Analyst's Office, 2020, OVERVIEW FEDERAL COV