Multi-criteria warehouse location selection using Choquet integral

被引:133
作者
Demirel, Tufan [2 ]
Demirel, Nihan Cetin [2 ]
Kahraman, Cengiz [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-80626 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Yildiz Tech Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Choquet integral; Fuzzy; Hierarchy; Multi-criteria; Warehouse location; Fuzzy measure; FACILITY LOCATION; TABU SEARCH; DECISIONS; MODEL; INFORMATION; SUPPORT; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2009.11.022
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The location of a warehouse is generally one of the most important and strategic decision in the optimization of logistic systems. Warehouse location is a long-term decision and is influenced by many quantitative and qualitative factors. Among the main criteria taken into account in this paper, some are costs, labor characteristics, infrastructure, and markets. This paper also includes some sub-criteria because of like tax incentives and tax structures, availability of labor force, the hierarchical structure of the problem, quality and reliability of modes of transportation, and proximity to customers. The conventional approaches to warehouse location selection problem tend to be less effective in dealing with the imprecise or vague nature of the linguistic assessment. Under many situations, the values of the qualitative criteria are often imprecisely defined for the decision-makers. Choquet integral is a suitable multi-criteria method to capture this imprecise or vague nature. This paper shows a successful application of multi-criteria Choquet integral to a real warehouse location selection problem of a big Turkish logistic firm. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3943 / 3952
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Alberto P., 2000, INT J LOGISTICS, V3, P273, DOI 10.1080/713682767
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, Fuzzy measures and integrals: theory and applications
  • [3] An empirical comparison of Tabu Search, Simulated Annealing, and Genetic Algorithms for facilities location problems
    Arostegui, Marvin A., Jr.
    Kadipasaoglu, Sukran N.
    Khumawala, Basheer M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2006, 103 (02) : 742 - 754
  • [4] Auephanwiriyakul S., 2002, Information Fusion, V3, P69, DOI 10.1016/S1566-2535(01)00054-9
  • [5] Exploring quantitative methods for project location selection
    Cheng, EWL
    Li, H
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 39 (12) : 1467 - 1476
  • [6] A public warehouses selection support system
    Colson, G
    Dorigo, F
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 153 (02) : 332 - 349
  • [7] MULTIOBJECTIVE ANALYSIS OF FACILITY LOCATION DECISIONS
    CURRENT, J
    MIN, H
    SCHILLING, D
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1990, 49 (03) : 295 - 307
  • [8] Combining numerical and linguistic information in group decision making
    Delgado, M
    Herrera, F
    Herrera-Viedma, E
    Martinez, L
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 1998, 107 (1-4) : 177 - 194
  • [9] Drezner Z., 2003, IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, V14, P321, DOI 10.1093/imaman/14.4.321
  • [10] Drezner Z., 1995, Facility Location: A Survey of Applications and Methods