Reduced Feedback and Random Beamforming for OFDM MIMO Broadcast Channels

被引:12
作者
Fakhereddin, Maralle J. [1 ]
Sharif, Masoud [3 ]
Hassibi, Babak [2 ]
机构
[1] VMware Inc, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[2] CALTECH, Dept Elect Engn, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Boston, MA 02215 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Channel state information; OFDM; broadcast channel; random beamforming; multi-user diversity; wireless communications; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1109/TCOMM.2009.12.060236
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
It has been shown that random beamforming using partial channel state information (CSI) achieves the same throughput scaling as obtained from dirty paper coding for a broadcast (downlink) channel with M transmit antennas and K users where K is large [1]. In this paper, we apply this scheme to wideband MIMO broadcast channels. By using OFDM, an L-tap wideband channel can be decomposed to N parallel narrowband channels (subcarriers), where N > L. Neighboring subcarriers are highly correlated. Therefore, we consider neighboring subcarriers as a cluster and find the closed form solution for the joint characteristic function of SINR values at two subcarriers in a cluster. We show numerically how the knowledge of the quality of the center subcarrier sheds light about the quality of other subcarriers in the same cluster, and address the issue of cluster size. In addition, through complex and asymptotic analysis, we show that for cluster size of order N/L root logK (for large K), users need only feedback the best SINR at the center subcarrier of each cluster in order for the transmitter to perform opportunistic beamforming and maintain the same throughput scaling as when full CSI is available. Using simulation results, we verify our analytical result and show that even fewer feedback can be tolerated, and larger clusters (N/2L) can be implemented for a small throughput hit.
引用
收藏
页码:3827 / 3835
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   MIMO Broadcast Channels with Spatial Heterogeneity [J].
Sohn, Illsoo ;
Andrews, Jeffrey G. ;
Lee, Kwang Bok .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, 2010, 9 (08) :2449-2454
[42]   Fairness maximization and delay analysis for multi-antenna broadcast channels using random beamforming [J].
Akhlaghi, Soroush ;
Borhani, Alireza .
COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2010, 33 (17) :2116-2124
[43]   Quantized feedback scheduling for MIMO-OFDM broadcast networks with subcarrier clustering [J].
Pattanayak, Prabina ;
Kumar, Preetam .
AD HOC NETWORKS, 2017, 65 :26-37
[44]   A Comparison of Scheduling Strategies for MIMO Broadcast Channel with Limited Feedback on OFDM Systems [J].
Ermanna Conte ;
Stefano Tomasin ;
Nevio Benvenuto .
EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2010
[45]   Receiver Cooperation for MIMO Broadcast Channels With Finite-Rate Feedback [J].
Mao, Hongliang ;
Feng, Wei ;
Ge, Ning .
IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS, 2015, 19 (05) :887-890
[46]   On Achievable Rate of User Selection for MIMO Broadcast Channels With Limited Feedback [J].
Min, Moonsik ;
Jeon, Yo-Seb ;
Im, Gi-Hong .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2017, 65 (01) :122-135
[47]   How Much Does Transmit Correlation Affect the Sum-Rate Scaling of MIMO Gaussian Broadcast Channels? [J].
Al-Naffouri, Tareq Y. ;
Sharif, Masoud ;
Hassibi, Babak .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2009, 57 (02) :562-572
[48]   Transceiver Design Framework for Multiuser MIMO-OFDM Broadcast Systems with Channel Gram Matrix Feedback [J].
Sacristan-Murga, Daniel ;
Payaro, Miquel ;
Pascual-Iserte, Antonio .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, 2012, 11 (05) :1774-1787
[49]   Performance Analysis of Spatially Correlated MIMO-OFDM Beamforming Systems with the Maximum Eigenvalue Model from Measured MIMO Channels [J].
Kim, Wonsop ;
Lee, Kyungnam ;
Kim, Myung-Don ;
Park, Jae Joon ;
Chung, Hyun Kyu ;
Lee, Hyuckjae .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, 2012, 11 (10) :3744-3753
[50]   On Transmit Beamforming for MISO-OFDM Channels With Finite-Rate Feedback [J].
Mamat, Kritsada ;
Santipach, Wiroonsak .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2015, 63 (11) :4202-4213