The sedative effects of the intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine in children undergoing surgeries compared to other sedation methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:33
作者
Kim, Hyun Jung [1 ]
Shin, Woo Jong [2 ]
Park, Suin [2 ]
Ahn, Hyeong Sik [1 ]
Oh, Jae Hoon [2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Dept Prevent Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Hanyang Univ, Dept Anesthesia & Pain Med, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Dexmedetomidine; Intranasal; Meta-analysis; Randomized controlled trials; Sedation; Systematic review; ORAL MIDAZOLAM; DOUBLE-BLIND; PREMEDICATION; ANESTHESIA; KETAMINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.01.014
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study objective: Administration of intranasal dexmedetomidine for sedation is comfortable and effective in children who are afraid of needles, and it offers efficient sedation similar to that of intravenous administration. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical effects of the pre-procedural administration of intranasal dexmedetomidine. Design: We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared intranasal dexmedetomidine administration to other administration methods of various sedatives or placebo from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, KoreaMed and hand searches of trial registries. Setting: Pediatrics who underwent interventional procedures and surgeries. Patients: Children under the age of 18. Interventions: Studies were included if they were compatible with the criteria that dexmedetomidine was administered intranasally. Measurements: We pooled data on the sedation status as the primary outcome and considered the behavioral score, blood pressure, heart rate and side effects to be secondary outcomes. Risk ratio (RR) and the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. Main results: This meta-analysis included 11 RCTs. The SMD for the sedative effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine was 2.45 (random, 95% CI; -3.33, -1.58) for continuous outcomes and RR of unsatisfactory patient outcome was 0.42 (M-H, random 95% CI; 026, 0.68 I-2 = 45%) for dichotomous outcomes compared to that of intranasal saline. The SMD for the sedative effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine was -0.41 (random, 95% CI; -1.09, 0.27 I-2 = 69%) for continuous outcomes and RR was 0.43 (M-H, random 95% CI; 0.32, 0.58 I-2 = 0%) for dichotomous outcomes compared to that of per os benzodiazepines. Conclusions: This review suggests that intranasal dexmedetomidine is associated with better sedative effects than oral benzodiazepines without producing respiratory depression, but it had a significantly delayed onset of effects. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 39
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [11] Dexmedetomidine pharmacodynamics: Part I - Crossover comparison of the respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in healthy volunteers
    Hsu, YW
    Cortinez, LI
    Robertson, KM
    Keifer, JC
    Sum-Ping, ST
    Moretti, EW
    Young, CC
    Wright, DR
    MacLeod, DB
    Somma, J
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 101 (05) : 1066 - 1076
  • [12] Bioavailability of dexmedetomidine after intranasal administration
    Iirola, Timo
    Vilo, Sanna
    Manner, Tuula
    Aantaa, Riku
    Lahtinen, Maria
    Scheinin, Mika
    Olkkola, Klaus T.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 67 (08) : 825 - 831
  • [13] Action of dexmedetomidine on the substantia gelatinosa neurons of the rat spinal cord
    Ishii, Hideaki
    Kohno, Tatsuro
    Yamakura, Tomohiro
    Ikoma, Miho
    Baba, Hiroshi
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 27 (12) : 3182 - 3190
  • [14] Liberati Alessandro, 2009, J Clin Epidemiol, V62, pe1, DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
  • [15] Pre-anesthetic medication with intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam as an anxiolytic. A clinical trial
    Linares Segovia, B.
    Garcia Cuevas, M. A.
    Ramirez Casillas, I. L.
    Guerrero Romero, J. F.
    Botello Buenrostro, I.
    Monroy Torres, R.
    Ramirez Gomez, X. S.
    [J]. ANALES DE PEDIATRIA, 2014, 81 (04): : 226 - 231
  • [16] Dexmedetomidine is effective for monitored anesthesia care in outpatients undergoing cataract surgery
    Na, Hyo-Seok
    Song, In-Ae
    Park, Hong-Sik
    Hwang, Jung-Won
    Do, Sang-Hwan
    Kim, Chong-Soo
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2011, 61 (06) : 453 - 459
  • [17] The effect of dexmedetomidine during myringotomy and pressure-equalizing tube placement in children
    Pestieau, Sophie R.
    Quezado, Zenaide M. N.
    Johnson, Yewande J.
    Anderson, Jennifer L.
    Cheng, Yao I.
    McCarter, Robert J.
    Pena, Maria T.
    Finkel, Julia C.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2011, 21 (11) : 1128 - 1135
  • [18] Effect of intranasal dexmedetomidine or oral midazolam premedication on sevoflurane EC50 for successful laryngeal mask airway placement in children: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Savla, Jyothi R.
    Ghai, Babita
    Bansal, Dipika
    Wig, Jyotsna
    [J]. PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2014, 24 (04) : 433 - 439
  • [19] ASAP ECMO: Antibiotic, Sedative and Analgesic Pharmacokinetics during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: a multi-centre study to optimise drug therapy during ECMO
    Shekar, Kiran
    Roberts, Jason A.
    Welch, Susan
    Buscher, Hergen
    Rudham, Sam
    Burrows, Fay
    Ghassabian, Sussan
    Wallis, Steven C.
    Levkovich, Bianca
    Pellegrino, Vin
    McGuinness, Shay
    Parke, Rachael
    Gilder, Eileen
    Barnett, Adrian G.
    Walsham, James
    Mullany, Daniel V.
    Fung, Yoke L.
    Smith, Maree T.
    Fraser, John F.
    [J]. BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2012, 12
  • [20] Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Sheta, Saad A.
    Al-Sarheed, Maha A.
    Abdelhalim, Ashraf A.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2014, 24 (02) : 181 - 189