What cognitive mechanisms predict travel mode choice? A systematic review with meta-analysis

被引:95
作者
Hoffmann, Christin [1 ]
Abraham, Charles [1 ]
White, Mathew P. [1 ,2 ]
Ball, Susan [3 ]
Skippon, Stephen M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Psychol Appl Hlth, Sch Med, Exeter EX1 2LU, Devon, England
[2] Univ Exeter, European Ctr Environm & Human Hlth, Sch Med, Truro, Cornwall, England
[3] Univ Exeter, NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula PenCLAHRC, Sch Med, Exeter, Devon, England
[4] Transport Res Lab, Wokingham, England
关键词
Travel mode; systematic review; meta-analysis; car use; transport policy; DECISION-MAKING MODEL; HABITUAL CAR USE; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; ATTITUDE THEORY; URBAN FORM; TRANSPORTATION; PERCEPTIONS; DETERMINANTS; MOBILITY;
D O I
10.1080/01441647.2017.1285819
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Reduced private car use can limit greenhouse gas emissions and improve public health. It is unclear, however, how promotion of alternative transport choices can be optimised. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to identify potentially modifiable cognitive mechanisms that have been related to car use and use of alternative transport modes. A qualitative synthesis of measures of potentially modifiable mechanisms based on 43 studies yielded 26 conceptually distinct mechanism categories. Meta-analyses of associations between these mechanisms and car use/non-use generated 205 effects sizes (Pearson's r) from 35 studies. The strongest correlates of car use were intentions, perceived behavioural control, attitudes and habit. The strongest correlates of alternative transportation choices were intentions, perceived behavioural control and attitudes. Implications for researchers and policy implementation are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 652
页数:22
相关论文
共 118 条
[1]   Factors influencing car use for commuting and the intention to reduce it: A question of self-interest or morality? [J].
Abrahamse, Wokje ;
Steg, Linda ;
Gifford, Robert ;
Vlek, Charles .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2009, 12 (04) :317-324
[2]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Energy and climate change
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE
[5]  
[Anonymous], SHORT JOURN BIG SAV
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, TRANSPORTATION THEOR
[7]  
[Anonymous], J BUSINESS LOGISTICS
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2004, CONSTRUCTING QUESTIO
[9]  
[Anonymous], CONSERVING ENERGY PR
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1998, QUAL ASS TOOL QUANT