Physical activity promotion as a strategic corporate priority to improve worker health and business performance

被引:88
作者
Pronk, Nicolaas P. [1 ,2 ]
Kottke, Thomas E. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] HealthPartners, JourneyWell, Minneapolis, MN 55440 USA
[2] HealthPartners Res Fdn, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Med, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
Physical activity; Worksite; Employee health; Business performance;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.06.025
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. The increasingly sedentary nature of work and its impact on health and productivity indicators demands the promotion of physical activity at the worksite. Purpose. This paper aims to present considerations for broad-scale application of corporate strategies designed to promote physical activity among employees and their families through employer-sponsored initiatives. Approach. The benefits of physical activity are multifold, including health and wellbeing and productivity related outcomes. The workplace setting may be leveraged to promote physical activity levels through frequent and sustained exposures to effective interventions that reach employees and, indirectly, their families. Furthermore, employers represent a powerful stakeholder group that should leverage its influence on health policy initiatives designed to create supportive environments inside the workplace as well as the broader community. Specific principles, recommendations for action, and considerations for the prioritization of initiatives are provided based on essential elements for comprehensive programs and health policy initiatives and in the context of a social-ecological model and supportive research. Conclusions. Physical activity promotion at the worksite should be an integrated initiative that measurably improves worker health and enhances business performance. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:316 / 321
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   The relationship between modifiable health risks and group-level health care expenditures [J].
Anderson, DR ;
Whitmer, RW ;
Goetzel, RZ ;
Ozminkowski, RJ ;
Wasserman, J ;
Serxner, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2000, 15 (01) :45-52
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, 2008
[3]  
BERQVIST U, 1995, MUSCULOSKELETAL DISO
[4]   Physical activity - Optimizing practice through research [J].
Kottke, Thomas E. ;
Pronk, Nicolaas P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2006, 31 (04) :S8-S10
[5]   AN ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE ON HEALTH PROMOTION PROGRAMS [J].
MCLEROY, KR ;
BIBEAU, D ;
STECKLER, A ;
GLANZ, K .
HEALTH EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 1988, 15 (04) :351-377
[6]  
*NIOSH, 2008, WORKLIFE IN ESS EL E
[7]   Checklist of health promotion environments at worksites (CHEW): Development and measurement characteristics [J].
Oldenburg, B ;
Sallis, JF ;
Harris, D ;
Owen, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2002, 16 (05) :288-299
[8]   Obesity, fitness, willingness to communicate and health care costs [J].
Pronk, NP ;
Tan, AWH ;
O'Connor, P .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1999, 31 (11) :1535-1543
[9]   IMPACT OF A DAILY 10-MINUTE STRENGTH AND FLEXIBILITY PROGRAM IN A MANUFACTURING PLANT [J].
PRONK, SJ ;
PRONK, NP ;
SISCO, A ;
INGALLS, DS ;
OCHOA, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 1995, 9 (03) :175-178
[10]  
Proper K., 2008, EFFECTIVENESS EC IMP