Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Measurements in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Preliminary Study of the Effect of Region of Interest on ADC Values and Interobserver Variability

被引:49
作者
Ma, Chao [1 ]
Liu, Li [1 ]
Li, Jing [1 ]
Wang, Li [1 ]
Chen, Lu-guang [1 ]
Zhang, Yong [2 ]
Chen, Shi-yue [1 ]
Lu, Jian-ping [1 ]
机构
[1] Second Mil Med Univ, Changhai Hosp Shanghai, Dept Radiol, 168 Changhai Rd, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[2] GE Healthcare, MR Grp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
上海市自然科学基金;
关键词
FORMING CHRONIC-PANCREATITIS; WEIGHTED IMAGING DWI; B-VALUE; FOCAL PANCREATITIS; RECTAL-CANCER; CARCINOMA; MRI; DIFFERENTIATION; MASS; REPRODUCIBILITY;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.25007
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the influence of region of interest (ROI) on tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements and interobserver variability in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Materials and Methods: Twenty-two patients recruited with pathology-proven PDAC underwent diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI, 3.0T) prior to the surgical resection. Two independent readers measured tumor ADCs according to three ROI methods: whole-volume, single-slice, and small solid sample of tumor. Minimum and mean ADCs were obtained. The interobserver variability for each of the three methods was analyzed using interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. The minimum and mean ADCs among the ROI methods were compared using nonparametric tests. Results: The single-slice ROI method showed the best reproducibility in the minimum ADC measurements (mean difference+/-limits of agreement between two readers were 0.025+/-0.25 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s; ICC, 0.92) among the three ROI methods. For the solid tumor sample ROI, both minimum ADC and mean ADC measurements reproducibility were the worst, with limits of agreement up to +/-0.50 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s and +/-0.32 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, respectively (ICCs, 0.41/0.58). Both the minimum and mean ADCs demonstrated significant differences among the three ROI methods (both P<0.001). The post-hoc analyses results showed no significant difference with regard to the mean ADCs between whole-volume and single-slice ROI methods (P=0.14). Conclusion: The ROI method had a considerable influence on both the minimum and mean ADC values and the interobserver variability in PDAC. The worst interobserver variability was observed for both the minimum and mean ADCs derived from small solid-sample ROI.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 413
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of the Pancreas: Current Status and Recommendations
    Barral, Matthias
    Taouli, Bachir
    Guiu, Boris
    Koh, Doh-Mu
    Luciani, Alain
    Manfredi, Riccardo
    Vilgrain, Valerie
    Hoeffel, Christine
    Kanematsu, Masayuki
    Soyer, Philippe
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2015, 274 (01) : 45 - 63
  • [2] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [3] Short- and Midterm Reproducibility of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements at 3.0-T Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Abdomen
    Braithwaite, Adam C.
    Dale, Brian M.
    Boll, Daniel T.
    Merkle, Elmar M.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2009, 250 (02) : 459 - 465
  • [5] MR-Diffusion Weighted Imaging of Healthy Liver Parenchyma: Repeatability and Reproducibility of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurement
    Colagrande, Stefano
    Pasquinelli, Filippo
    Mazzoni, Lorenzo Nicola
    Belli, Giacomo
    Virgili, Gianni
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2010, 31 (04) : 912 - 920
  • [6] Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Pancreas Diagnostic Benefit From an Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Model-Based 3 b-Value Analysis
    Concia, Massimo
    Sprinkart, Alois M.
    Penner, Arndt-Hendrik
    Brossart, Peter
    Gieseke, Juergen
    Schild, Hans H.
    Willinek, Winfried A.
    Muertz, Petra
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2014, 49 (02) : 93 - 100
  • [7] Agreement and Reproducibility of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements of Dual-b-Value and Multi-b-Value Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 Tesla in Phantom and in Soft Tissues of the Abdomen
    Corona-Villalobos, Celia Pamela
    Pan, Li
    Halappa, Vivek Gowdra
    Bonekamp, Susanne
    Lorenz, Christine H.
    Eng, John
    Kamel, Ihab R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2013, 37 (01) : 46 - 51
  • [8] Field Strength and Diffusion Encoding Technique Affect the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements in Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Abdomen
    Dale, Brian M.
    Braithwaite, Adam C.
    Boll, Daniel T.
    Merkle, Elmar M.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2010, 45 (02) : 104 - 108
  • [9] Pancreatic Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI): Comparison Between Mass-Forming Focal Pancreatitis (FP), Pancreatic Cancer (PC), and Normal Pancreas
    Fattahi, Rana
    Balci, N. Cem
    Perman, William H.
    Hsueh, Eddy C.
    Alkaade, Samer
    Havlioglu, Necat
    Burton, Frank R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 29 (02) : 350 - 356
  • [10] Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Variability of Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging Findings
    Fukukura, Yoshihiko
    Takumi, Koji
    Kamimura, Kiyohisa
    Shindo, Toshikazu
    Kumagae, Yuichi
    Tateyama, Akihiro
    Nakajo, Masayuki
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2012, 263 (03) : 732 - 740